Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

E46 Dinan S1 BMW M3 - Track Driven

Photos by: Graham MacNeil

A few years ago, I was still a student and I had a class called Internal Combustion Engines. It was easily one of my favourite classes, as you can image. Studying engines, calculating hp, torque, efficiency, and exhaust flow for grades? Sign me up! It wasn't just the content, though, as magnificent as it was. The class itself was taught by the coolest prof there is. You may think you've had a cool prof, teacher, coach, or instructor, but I've got the standard by which all educators must be measured.

For one, he or she has to teach something that is cool.. does it get cooler than Internal Combustion Engines? (No, in case you're wondering). This one is also a true gear head, so much so that he sticks around after class and argues about cars, performance, lap times, and racing. And occasionally does so in the middle of class.. For one class project, I proposed comparing the engines and specifications of the C6 Corvette ZR1 and the Ferrari 599, in an attempt to "reverse engineer" various thermal and physical parameters of the engines based on published specs. He agreed. He also shows you how to start high performance driving by bringing you to your first HPDE school.. If all of that isn't enough, a few years later, he lets you drive his baby - an E46 Dinan S1 BMW M3. That, ladies and gentlemen, is what a cool prof should be like. And his car.. THAT is what a cool BMW should be like.


For years, I've held this belief: an E46 M3 is the best M3, thereby making it my favourite 3-series, and thereby making it my favourite BMW. It's quite an important role, but one that unfortunately did not have first hand experience to back it up. I've been in every generation M3 on track, starting from an E30 all the way to the F80. I've read a lot about all of them, talked to people who track them, heard them at full chat, seen what they're capable of, etc. All of this resulted in me favouring the E46 M3 above all others. I found it to be the perfect sweet spot, the best example of the breed. But I had no experience behind the wheel of one. Until now. And before driving it, I was worried this might be a case of "never meet your heroes". It wasn't. Not even close.

I wrote about my track drive of a Cayman GT4 not too long ago (link here: Cayman GT4. Driven. On Track.). I actually drove both cars on the same day. The M3 does not stand a chance against the Cayman GT4 (sorry, Julio..). But that's only if you take out your stop watch and start timing. If timing isn't a priority, this M3 makes one heck of a case for itself, and we're comparing an excellent, relatively new, mid-engine Cayman here to an old M3 costing a fraction of the price. If the GT4 has great steering and communication through the chassis, the M3 is a stereotypical Italian in comparison; it won't shut up, or stop talking, yelling, and waving its hands. It seems like you can feel everything that is going on, and not in a cheap car or stripped-down race car kind of way with no insulation, rubber, or sound deadening. There is just an abundance of information making it through the chassis compared to new cars. The Cayman GT4 feels like it would never put a wheel wrong because it is hugely trustworthy. The M3, though, is different.. It makes YOU feels like you will never put a wheel wrong because you feel everything that is going on. That is this car's true party piece.



It's not the performance, not anymore. It was an impressive 4 seater track car in its day, but today, the performance of an E46 M3 is merely average as far as performance cars go. Don't get me wrong, it's still a very capable car. But you can get a V6 Camaro (1LE) today that can go head to head with a stock E46 M3 on track. Of course, the Camaro would be quite a bit more expensive, but the point is that the performance of one of the gold standards of sports cars - an M3 - is now attainable on a V6 Camaro. Progress has caught up to the E46 M3 capabilities. This is perfectly normal given the E46's vintage. In fact, it is what makes this car special. It is so much fun to drive and so refreshing compared to modern "sporty" cars, that you want to drive it even if you could drive something else that's more capable for the same amount of money.

I can't speak a whole lot for the balance of a stock one, because this one isn't. It's a Dinan S1 and it's lowered and cambered (-2 degrees, I'm told), with square 265/35/18 tires front and back (stock are 225/45/18 fronts and 255/40/18 rears), so stock balance is likely very different from this. This one is very neutral and could be provoked into rotating with a gentle but deliberate prod of the throttle. It is certainly not loose, which is good, but feels as close to neutral as you want a street/track car to be. It was set up by one of the best the best local performance and tuning shop; ISI Automotive, so it's no surprise (I wrote about one of my first few visits to the shop here when I got my camber plates alignment). It's also very composed and did much better than I expected over our track's roughest sections, remaining stable and controllable. I really wish I had driven a stock one to see what it's like, but even if you assume a little less neutral at the limit, it'd still be fantastic.


Trail braking does not rotate it as nicely as the Cayman GT4, but it is so much easier to get the back end to rotate under power - like a proper front engine, RWD sports car. With that said, you'll have to turn assists off. Traction control is terrible. It'll keep you out of the woods, but it's very frustrating. It's aggressive with its interruption, not subtle. Worse yet, the limits are low and it's not quick to back off so if you find its limits - which is easy to do - you'll feel a delay before it decides you can be trusted with power again. If you're still learning the car and/or track, I can see that being very frustrating if you want to keep the safety nets, which you should. This significantly under-performs modern traction control systems - even including my Boss 302, which is built on a relatively old platform (S197 first debuting on the 2005 Mustang). Thankfully, the engine is far better than the saddle straddling it that is the traction control..

The engine is an absolute masterpiece. Seriously, BMW, what the heck happened? How did you go from the S54 to, well, anything else in a 3-series today, let alone an M3/M4? For a naturally aspirated, high rpm screamer, there's power everywhere and that power is massively linear all the way from idle to redline. Combined with great gearing, you wind it out, shift, and repeat.. again, and again. What a joy to drive. And the noise.. Straight six, relatively uncorked, individual throttle bodies, and 7,900 rpm redline. I mean, what else could you possibly want out of a sports car engine? It's powerful, with no weak spots, linear, flexible, responsive, and loves to rev. Sure, it could use more hp, but there isn't a single great sports car out there that couldn't use more power. Julio has been tracking this M3 for a few years now (although not heavily). I don't know how reliable these engines are when regularly pushed, but if they aren't problematic, there's nothing to fault under the hood.


And I hope you haven't heard enough complaining about modern BMW steering.. because you're about to hear some more. There's a good reason for it. I actually drove a BMW M4 on track on the same day. Boy, what a difference. I'll be writing a separate review about the M4 in another article, but what you need to know now is that the M4 is not even on the same planet of fun-to-drive cars as this M3. The M4 would be so much better if it could learn a thing or two from this car. It's amazing how much newer the M4 is, yet this E46 M3 feels like it is far better sports car. There's real organic feel in the steering and real information about the tires make it through to your hands. Combined with great steering response and balance (and camber of course), the car feels so light and tossable, imparting the sensation it is hundreds of pounds lighter than the M4 despite being less capable in outright grip and "only" 150-200 lb lighter.

The story continues for brakes. Braking feel and modulation are fantastic. There was no fade that I could tell, although I didn't go 10/10th. And the brakes are floating calipers, not the sort of gigantic fixed calipers with a thousand pistons you find on everything these days. It's amazing - and very disappointing - how the industry and the market for sports car have made everything "better", yet the vast majority seem to have forgot the essence of what makes a sports car great. And it's not like it couldn't hold its own. When tested by Car and Driver, a 2003 M3 stopped from 70-0 mph in 161 ft, "just" 10 ft longer than a current M4 with massive carbon-ceramic brakes, much bigger tires, and newer and more grippy tire compounds. Honestly, when you start thinking about it, you wonder how the M4 did so poorly with all that braking hardware compared to the lowly, decade-plus-old E46 M3.


Put it all together, and you get a car that really feels special. It's very difficult to put a finger on one thing. In fact, you can be sure that it's not one thing - it's the entire package. Some reviewers call it the X-factor; when a car is so good, but you can't quite credit one aspect or another. I bet you if James May drove this car, it would give him "the fizz" in spades. This made writing about the car very difficult. It doesn't quite excel at any metric, but it just makes you happy to drive and push around the track. I can tell you the steering, the engine, or the chassis is good. I can tell you it sounds great. I can tell you a lot of good things about it. But what I can't tell you is how good it all comes together. The only way to truly know is to go out and drive one on a nice back road or, even better, on track.

Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!






Comments

  1. Wow! What a brilliant write-up! I agree with every word, including the comments on the coolest prof there is! E46 is by far the best M machine there is, and J is by far the coolest and best prof there is, and I'm thrilled to know them both! Happy driving J!
    Salute!
    VIU

    ReplyDelete

Post a comment







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track load

Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R Track Review

2012 Boss 302 on square 305/30/19 RE-71R's at AMP - Graham MacNeil © For better or for worse, I have heard and read so much about RE-71R's. Everyone swears by the grip but complains about the wear. Generally speaking, the pros are: 1. They grip as well or better than most R comps. 2. They don't wear as quickly as R comps if driven occasionally on the street. 3. They work better in the rain than R comps. The cons were limited to overheating quickly when used on track (being an autocross tire) and wearing too fast on heavy cars like mine. In the popular 200 TW category, they are faster than the popular Hankook RS-4's and BFGoodrich Rival S's according to published Tire Rack Tests. According to plenty of reviews, they are also faster than well established R comps like R888R's (which don't seem to work too well on heavy cars anyway) and the venerable NT01's. But I was still hesitant for a while until I talked to a tire tech support gentleman

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity. Grip is noticeably l