Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

2020 G80 BMW M3 to bring more than 500 hp and AWD


The current (and outgoing) BMW M3 upset quite a few purists when it switched to turbocharging to boost power from a long line of naturally aspirated engines. It looks like the upcoming G80 M3 based on the new G20 3-series is looking to buck the tradition again by being the first ever M3 to offer AWD/4WD. That's right, it looks like the next M3 will send power to all four wheels according to a report by Auto Express.

Of course, it won't be the first ever M-car to offer AWD. That honour goes to the current M5 which was the first M sedan/saloon car, so perhaps that should have been a sign of things to come. It makes a lot of sense, given the competition. Fast Audi have been AWD for several generations and recently, AMG announced that the future of AMG is four-wheel drive.


Tough Competition

Audi is nearly synonymous with AWD and with AMG now switching to AWD, a RWD M3 would (unfortunately) be quite handicapped in terms of traction and objective performance. Competition isn't only from petrol/gasoline cars only, of course. The Tesla Model 3 Performance - which is also AWD if still very unproven - has shown more than once of being capable of beating a current M3 on track. Here's the latest example from Top Gear.


Competitors from less established brands are still RWD, such as Alfa's Giulia Quadrofoglio and Cadillac's ATS-V. But the ATS-V is soon to be dead and who knows what the next Alfa will be. Of course, the current AMG C63 is still RWD but its replacement likely won't be.

Fortunately, the system will almost certainly match the current M5 setup. That means multiple modes, including a 2WD mode sending power only to the rear wheels if you still want to drive a RWD M3. For the purists, that won't be enough because the weight and parasitic drag from drivetrain components connected to the front wheels will keep the system from feeling 100% like true RWD, but at least it will drive like a RWD car otherwise. BMW seems to not be too concerned about old-school steering feedback, anyway, so perhaps there isn't much to lose.


The Power

The car should use a modified M version of the new B58 turbocharged 3.0 litre straight six engine in the G20 340i. It will likely switch to twin-turbos like the current M3/M4. The most powerful version of the current M3/M4 was M4 GTS, which made 493 hp with the help of water-injection. The next rung down is the M3/M4 CS making 454 hp. Auto Express reports that the next one will come with 480 hp as standard which is a substantial jump, and an optional Competition Package will make 510 hp.


The most power ever in an M3 combined with the first ever AWD M3 should make a huge difference in acceleration. In the hands of Car and Driver magazine, the current M5 cracked the 3 second barrier and set a 0-60 mph run in just 2.8 seconds. This upcoming M3 shouldn't be far behind. And thankfully, it appears like it will sound MUCH better than the outgoing M3/M4 based on the spy video of testing at the Nürburgring.


Under The Skin

Being based on the new G20 3-series means starting off with a stiffer and lighter chassis. When BMW revealed the current 3-series, it said it will be 120 lb. (54 kg) lighter than the last one and overall torsional stiffness was up by 25% and specific load bearing sections (such as the front strut tower with brace) are stiffer by up to 50%. The new 3-series also widened front track significantly to 62.3" (1,582 mm) and rear up slightly to 62.9" (1,598 mm) which is nearly the same as the current and outgoing M3. You can read all about the G20 3-series here. The new M3 will likely improve even further on those.

Overall, it sounds like the new M3 will be phenomenally capable. BMW announced that it will reveal it in September at the Frankfurt Motor Show. Expect prices to creep up for the new model, more so than usual with a new M3 as a result of the addition of the AWD system. While I don't love how BMW is moving further and further away from the original M3 formula, I'm really curious to see what this M3 will be capable of. I suspect it will leapfrog the current one in performance.

Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!





Comments







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

Falken Azenis RT615k+ Street and Track Review

Last year, I picked up a 2009 Lancer Ralliart to do a long term test with it as a dual duty track/daily. One of the first things I knew I was going to do was put a decent set of tires on it. The car came without OEM wheels which was actually good because I didn't have to hesitate about getting a good set of aftermarket wheels to support going wider. Thankfully, my friends at YST Auto Halifax  set me up with a great set of Superspeed RF03RR wheels. The Wheels I had never even heard of Superspeed but I trusted the good folk at YST Auto who mentioned some customer cars running on track with them. These wheels are rotary forged which is basically a prerequisite to be taken seriously in this market populated by companies like TSW and Fast Wheels. The wheels looked like a high quality, well finished wheel and each had a "QC" check sticker on. Just for appearances? Maybe, but I found no defects. The wheels seemed easy to balance (didn't need many weights) and at 18.1 lb. f

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track load

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity. Grip is noticeably l