Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

Faster than A Corvette Z06? - A Closer Look

"its test-track acceleration numbers would match the Porsche Panamera Turbo and embarrass a Chevrolet Corvette Z06 owner." That's what Motor Trend had to say about the 2013 Audi S8 after a test. Let's get the facts out of the way first: the Audi S8 is fast.. very fast, especially for a 4,600+ lb sedan.

According to their test, it gets from 0 to 60 mph in 3.5 seconds and finishes a 1/4 mile in a mere 11.8 seconds @ 118.3 mph. That's impressive. Apparently, though, it's not impressive enough to attract readers so something extra had to be said. Track test acceleration numbers would embarrass a Chevrolet Z06 owner? How? I looked up Z06 acceleration numbers.. from Motor Trend tests. I found 5 different tests and all of them pull a 0-60 mph in a consistent 3.8 seconds, except for the Z06 with the Z07 package which does it in 3.7 seconds. 1/4 mile? 2 tests are at 11.6 seconds, 1 test is at 11.7, 1 is at 11.8 and another at 11.9. So out of 5 tests, the Corvette was quicker in 3 tests, tied the Audi in 1 test and was slower by only 1 tenth in one of the tests.

Needless to say, the Corvette has a trap speed that's far higher, anywhere between ~ 122.5 - 126.6 mph.. at 1/4 mile, the Corvette would be flying past the Audi. The one (and only) metric where the Audi clearly excels at is the 0-60 time and by only 3 tenths. I'm not going to get into handling because it was not brought up and only a fool would compare the handling of an Audi S8 to a Corvette Z06. When evaluating a car's straight line performance, whether you're road racing or drag racing, 0-60 times tell you very little. 1/4 mile acceleration metrics give a much better picture.

That's besides the point, though, because Motor Trend editors know that. They know the complete picture and I'm sure (at least I hope) they remember that the Corvette only loses from 0-60 because of the AWD launch advantage but it's a different story at the 1/4 mile. What they're probably trying to do is write stuff that gets people arguing, commenting and coming back to the site. This does bother me a little but it doesn't really get on my nerves. What does get on my nerves is what ends up happening: creating tools.

One of the comments was by a guy saying that (and I'm paraphrasing) his grandma could drive this car with grandchildren in the back and a trunk full of groceries and beat the Corvette Z06 at a traffic light. No.. I don't encourage street racing but a Corvette Z06 would most likely live it in the dust. You see, in order to get that perfect 0-60 time, you have to rev the engine up to the optimum rpm, hold the revs up high (making yourself look like a fool if you're at a traffic light) and lift off the brakes right away. This guy took "embarrass a Chevrolet Corvette Z06 owner" to mean that an Audi S8 is a lot faster, period, regardless of:
1- having an extra couple hundred pounds worth of groceries and kids in the back
2- a street start that gives up most of the AWD launch advantage
3- the possibility that you don't know the best launch rpm because most people don't time and practise their 0-60 launches
4- whether or not the race continues after 60 mph

I usually just laugh when I look back at running into tools like that and arguing with them but while I'm arguing, it's VERY annoying and stuff like that make running into those people a much more frequent occurrence. This is why pulling stuff like that off in car reviews gets on my nerves; it plays a huge rule in increasing the number of tools.. the same way The Fast and The Furious caused a large boost in the number of tools and ricers on the road, except this huge exaggeration is even worse in a way.. it is coming from a much more legit source/influence: an instrumental car test and review.

Comments







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track loads.…

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity.

Grip is noticeably lowe…

The Truth behind Owning a Modified Ferrari 458 Italia

After driving and reviewing this modified 620 hp Ferrari 458 Italia, I talk to the owner to find out the truth behind owning and living with a modern Ferrari. This isn't a garage queen Ferrari either, it serves double duty as an every day car and track car. Watch to find out ownership costs, reliability, and experience. Interested in joining Scott at the track? Check out MHPDC.

Liked this? Make sure to subscribe so you don't miss new videos!



Follow Rams Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!






View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Michael R (@ramseyethetrackguy) on May 21, 2019 at 5:17pm PDT

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's

If you've had any doubts about whether or not they will fit, fear not! You absolutely can run square 305/30/19's. I had a lot of doubts before pulling the trigger, even more so when the wheels where on the car. The tires do poke out a bit and I figured rubbing is all but guaranteed at full compression but I couldn't be happier I trusted APEX and those on here who have run it.

Here's what you need:

1. Camber plates: I have MM C/C plates and they are maxed out at -2.3 deg with the stock struts. I have been running them for years with many track days without issue.

2. 1"/25 mm spacer: I have Motorsport-tech 1" spacers and they look like high quality units. There is maybe a 1/4 inch clearance in the back so you can't go any narrower than 25 mm. http://www.motorsport-tech.com/adaptec/car/ford_s and you want Design 2.


3. Elongated studs: your best bet is to get the FPP hubs with elongated studs instead of reusing the old one. Bearings are consumables anyway so…