Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

Details about the new 2014 Chevy SS




Chevrolet has finally revealed its much anticipated RWD flagship sedan. As expected, the car looks nearly identical to its Australian cousin, the Holden VF Commodore SS-V and bears great resemblance to the late Pontiac G8 GXP. Unlike the Holden and the Pontiac though, the Chevy will only be offered with a 6-speed automatic as the sole transmission option. This is disappointing for those of us who prefer to row their own gears but I doubt it will affect sales.




Since Dodge pulled out of NASCAR, this makes Chevrolet the only maker to have a RWD production vehicle (and a V8 one at that matter) using the same nameplate that's used for NASCAR. It, unfortunately, still isn't mechanically related to the race car but a shared name and front end is a good start.




It will be offered with the LS3 6.2 L V8 making 415 hp and 415 lb-ft of torque routed to the rear wheels and a 3.27 final drive ratio. Chevy is estimating a 0-60 time of about 5 seconds but I am expecting this to be overly conservative. A mid-high 4 second range is more reasonable, especially when considering that the G8 GXP always posted a sub 5-second 0-60 times.




Braking power comes courtesy of two piece, four piston brembo brakes up front and single pistons sliding callipers out back. Chevy says the weight distribution will be a near perfect 50/50 with a low weight distribution, thanks in part to aluminum hood and trunk lid that save 30% compared to equivalent steel parts. 19 inch forged aluminum wheels are standard, wrapped in Bridgestone tires with a staggered setup - 245/40/19 fronts and 275/35/19 rears. Sport tuned suspension and power steering system round off the handling package. According GM's executive chief engineer of GM global programs, David Leone, the car will deliver incredible grip and handling balance while cornering and a comfortable drive while on the road. Sounds great to me!




The car will come with many standard convenience and safety features and will seat 5 adults comfortable. Chevy's MyLink infotainment system, heads up display, push-button start, 9-speaker Bose audio system, eight-way power front buckets, blue accent lighting, LED daytime running lights and HID headlamps are all standard features. Increasing the premium feel, stitched leather, soft touch materials, embroidered SS decals on the seats and dashboard and chrome trim are also all standard. The seats actually look like they have cutouts for a 5 point harness.






Safety features include forward collision alert, lane departure warning, side blind spot monitors, stability control, traction control, a backup camera and rear cross traffic alert. Automatic Parking Assist, a Chevy first, will provide assistance in parallel and reverse right angle parking situations. It will also seat five adults comfortably, which is to be expected from a big Chevy. Power sunroof is expected to be the only option.




Judging by the long list of standard features and the tire-shredding Corvette V8 engine (as the only engine option), the SS is not expected to have an entry level model for masses like the G8. It will stay true to Chevy's tradition of good value for money though, so a price tag similar to that of a luxury car with the same size, power and features is out of the question. I expect MSRP to be close to or under $45k which will be a heck of a bargain for what you get. Will this car be as good or better than the Pontiac G8 and receive the same praise that it did? Will Ford or at least Lincoln be next in line to offer a RWD performance sedan? I sure hope so.


Comments

  1. Thanks for the Information, I have been looking to purchasing a new car for a few weeks now and I want to make sure I'm going to the best place possible. So, I've been doing some internet research on a few South New Jersey Chevy Dealers and came across your page. What is your favorite Chevy model? I'm looking for something sporty but still economical.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you're considering used as well as new Chevys, then nothing beats a 2008-2010 turbo Cobalt SS when it comes to a package that combines performance and economy. Otherwise, it would have to be a Camaro V6 with a manual, which gives up a little performance and economy compared to a turbo Cobalt SS, but you get better quality and style plus RWD dynamics. This is all based on stock specs, of course. With all financial and economical considerations aside though, my favourite Chevy model is the Corvette Z06!

      Delete

Post a comment







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would

GTR vs Evo X vs STI: which has the best AWD system?

A few weeks ago, I made a post explaining  mainstream AWD system types and how they compare , pros and cons, etc. including some simple diagrams to show where the power goes and how much. As promised, this post will focus on specific cars and what AWD systems they use, especially ones that that have more or less been defined by their AWD systems, and the best place to start may be with a bombshell; the Nissan GT-R. Nissan GT-R (R35) The GT-R has built a reputation around having monster traction and very approachable performance, thanks to its AWD system - Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain (ATTESA) - and what it can do for you. But the GT-R doesn't actually use the most mechanically sophisticated type of AWD systems discussed in the previous article, namely a "true" AWD with a centre differential. Instead, it uses a clutch pack to transfer power. RWD-based clutch-type AWD schematic - Rams Eye The Track Guy © The R32, R33, and R34 Sky

Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R Track Review

2012 Boss 302 on square 305/30/19 RE-71R's at AMP - Graham MacNeil © For better or for worse, I have heard and read so much about RE-71R's. Everyone swears by the grip but complains about the wear. Generally speaking, the pros are: 1. They grip as well or better than most R comps. 2. They don't wear as quickly as R comps if driven occasionally on the street. 3. They work better in the rain than R comps. The cons were limited to overheating quickly when used on track (being an autocross tire) and wearing too fast on heavy cars like mine. In the popular 200 TW category, they are faster than the popular Hankook RS-4's and BFGoodrich Rival S's according to published Tire Rack Tests. According to plenty of reviews, they are also faster than well established R comps like R888R's (which don't seem to work too well on heavy cars anyway) and the venerable NT01's. But I was still hesitant for a while until I talked to a tire tech support gentleman

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track load