Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

2018 Ford Mustang Upgrades!




Ever since I bought my Mustang, I have been gradually growing loyal to the brand. I’m not sure why. I like a lot of different cars and never felt like picking a camp, but I guess when you buy a car, you start to have to defend its honour (and your decision) whenever someone takes a stab at it. For someone who is so into cars, I think only one of two things can happen: you are either convinced of what “foes” claim and start to regret your decision, or you find more conviction as you defend your decision and love the car even more. Count me among the latter and, needless to say, I was properly excited when I found out about the updates Ford is bringing to the 2018 Mustang.

For starters, the Mustang finally (probably.. hopefully) will get its horsepower mojo back. When Ford unleashed its 5.0 litre Coyotes to prey on the competition circa 2010, it was basically undisputed. The Camaro SS was usually slower in tests. You couldn’t say Challenger R/T in the same breath; you had to go up to the mighty SRT8 to compete, and even that couldn’t stand its ground until Mopar minions bestowed the 392 (6.4 litre) V8 upon the Challenger that it was really competitive and it wasn’t until you got into serious lose-your-license speeds that the Challenger hp advantage started to show. Otherwise, its weight disadvantage let it down. GT500 vs ZL1? Well, we all know how that went.. Chevy debuted the 570 hp Camaro ZL1, but before it had any chance to be proud, Ford unleaded the 663 hp GT500. But all that changed with the new S550 Mustang..




The GT500 went the way of its S197 platform.. The 5.0 litre V8 made a little more hp but not enough to make up for the weight gain, making the new one a little slower than the old S197. To make matter worse, the new Camaro came out with more hp AND less weight. The GT wasn't the only issue. Ford neutered its V6, which used to be easily quicker than the Camaro and Challenger V6’s. The EcoBoost barely kept up with a last generation S197 V6. If hp and speed were the reason you wanted a new pony car but you weren’t loyal to a brand and you didn’t care too much for modifying, the Camaro was calling your number (assuming you could put up with the sight lines, which aren't as bad as people make them out to be, but still seriously compromised). You can read my comparison of a 2016 Camaro SS vs 2016 Mustang GT here. Of course, there's a lot more to buying a car than horsepower and acceleration numbers, but they are very important to a lot of buyers.

You might say: BUT you are forgetting the Shelby GT350, you idiot! Why aren’t you talking about that?? Sure, it’s a fantastic thing. I love the GT350. There is a local dealer that has a few (yes, a few) new ones and every time we drive by, I just want to drive in and stare at them. Trouble is: it’s quite a few grand more than a Camaro SS, and A LOT more if you factor in Camaro discounts and GT350 markups. The gap is even bigger compared to a Mustang GT because that is cheaper than a Camaro SS to start with, which is much cheaper than a GT350. So if you were Mustang loyal, you had a very sizeable gap between the Mustang GT and the Shelby GT350. You could tap into the Ford Performance parts catalogue, but those reduce powertrain warranty from 5 years to 3 years, and make the car basically as expensive as a Camaro SS, which handles better and has a better warranty. It wasn’t the best solution, but it may have been the only one. However, it looks like Ford is looking to light some fire under the class again..




Fire, let’s take a moment to mourn the death of the 3.7 litre V6.. Ok, moment is over. Don’t get me wrong, I was a big fan of it and I always thought it punched above its weight but it was long overdue for an update. An update that Ford didn’t want to provide because of its EcoBoost-infested vision of the future. Might as well let it die in peace. Speaking of the EcoBoost, it's getting more torque with an overboost function, although Ford isn't saying how much. People have been tuning them with great results so we all know it has more potential. It'll be interesting to see how much difference it makes, but Ford says it was substantial enough to warrant a transmission upgrade. Sound good? You bet! Hopefully, it's not just marketing talk.

But the real treat is the V8, which will finally get direct injection but will retain port injection, overcoming fueling issues at high rpm and valve fouling associated with direct injection-only engines. Direct  Injection allows for better atomization resulting in better combustion, and better power as a result. Moreover, that results in a cooling effect which, when combined with better control on fuel delivery, allows for higher compression ratio, again resulting in more power. The end result? Ford won’t say yet, but I think it will come real close to the Camaro’s hp (at least). I’m hoping for 470 hp, but that may be too optimistic. And better yet, Ford didn’t just focus on power.




The handling is addressed too, with a retuned suspension and stiffened chassis, plus the option of magnetic shocks across the board, including the EcoBoost! Ford says the base suspension now is as good as the Performance Pack. But the highlight of all is, IMO, is the tires. The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tires are the successor to the excellent Pilot Super Sport. One of the best street/track tires available in the last few years IMO. There were plenty of tires that were much stickier, better in the wet, longer lasting, or forgiving but none could match the balance the PSS provided between of all these criteria and more. The new one can only be better. This is the area I care about the most, as I pointed out in the review I posted above, the Mustang became more grown up than the last generation while the Camaro became more playful. As a car guy inflicted with the track bug, I couldn't be happier that Ford is improving the handling and overall capability.

And if you thought that was all, you’re wrong! Things just keep getting better. It may be trivial, but I wasn’t a fan of the front end at all since it debuted. It wasn’t ugly by any means, but it was too much corporate Ford and not nearly enough Mustang. The headlights were the worst offenders and I’m VERY happy to see them GONE. The new headlights are more of an evolution of the S197 headlights that are made “squintier” and pulled into the fender. They are still not as good as the S197 IMO, but they look much more modern and sinister, yet far more muscular the very-nearly-identical Fusion headlights that are available now. Better still, the upgrades to the front fascia make the car more aerodynamic, reducing drag and lift at higher speeds. Hard to complain. Out back, the GT switches to quad exhausts and Ford will offer electronically controlled exhaust valves to vary tone, something I liked a lot about the Camaro SS in my comparison posted above.




The end result is a Mustang that looks better, handles better, goes faster, and still packs a V8. What is there to complain about? If I had to complain about something, it would be that Ford made the new Mustang so much better that I really want one now..


Comments







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track load

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity. Grip is noticeably l

Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R Track Review

2012 Boss 302 on square 305/30/19 RE-71R's at AMP - Graham MacNeil © For better or for worse, I have heard and read so much about RE-71R's. Everyone swears by the grip but complains about the wear. Generally speaking, the pros are: 1. They grip as well or better than most R comps. 2. They don't wear as quickly as R comps if driven occasionally on the street. 3. They work better in the rain than R comps. The cons were limited to overheating quickly when used on track (being an autocross tire) and wearing too fast on heavy cars like mine. In the popular 200 TW category, they are faster than the popular Hankook RS-4's and BFGoodrich Rival S's according to published Tire Rack Tests. According to plenty of reviews, they are also faster than well established R comps like R888R's (which don't seem to work too well on heavy cars anyway) and the venerable NT01's. But I was still hesitant for a while until I talked to a tire tech support gentleman

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would