Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

I Pretend My VW Rabbit is a Rally Car

Nearly lifting off at BAC Rallycross #1 2018-2019 Season - Kevin Doubleday ©

I hate potholes (what driver doesn't?). We are no strangers to them where I live due to plenty of rain and a lot of freeze and thaw cycles. I typically do my absolute best to avoid them. I cringe when I hit the smallest one. But when you're at a rallycross and you see... there's no other word for it, a little crater that's right where you want to be, what do you do? You pretend your car is a rally car and go for it. It might have helped that the car was cheap and I got it specifically for rallycross...

If you've read my first rallycross post - The Ram's Eye is going Rallycross - you already know I'm starting rallycross this season for the first time after finally picking up this car for it. The car is a 2007 VW Rabbit. It was the first manual car I came across in my budget that was in good running order and had proven aftermarket limited slip diff options. It has the standard 5 cylinder 2.5 litre engine making 150 hp. It was later bumped to 170 hp in 2008... but it is still easily one of my favourite VW engines. Aside from a few luxuries that came standard, it is pretty bare. That's great for me; less weight and less to go wrong. I'll probably gut most of it at some point, but at least it's as light as it could be until that time comes. Without changing a thing on the car, and using the crappy (and bald) all season Aeolus tires that came on it, I took the car to my first rallycross.

My VW Golf/Rabbit 2.5 on day one. Not much has changed since.

Having done countless track and lapping days since I started in 2011, plus HPDE schools, racing, and instructing with a couple of the local car clubs, I was very eager to get out and see how good a time I can get on my first try. After my first run, I found out just how good I was (or bad, rather). My time was 65.97 seconds. It was the slowest time of the run session and turned out to be the slowest time of the day (excluding runs that had spin offs or car trouble). For reference, the fastest time in my class - stock 2WD - in that run session was 60.47 seconds. I was well off the pace I needed to be competitive. The second run session, I tried to go tighter to cones and push a little harder. And I improved! By less than a second... my second run was 65.12 s. Best in my class had dropped to 59.12 s. Something had to change.

Naturally (being a racer), I started to think of excuses. "I wonder how much my crappy all season tires are hurting me." I asked some of the regulars and I was told was that my tires are probably costing me at least 3 seconds and likely 3-4 s. With the right tires, I should be in the 61-62 second range. That was very encouraging and pumped a bit of air back into my ego. But I still had a 2-3 second gap to be competitive. My first thought after that was: "I need my car to rotate." I was driving too much like I do on track; trying to be very smooth with all inputs and keeping spinning to a minimum. There were a few tight turns ranging between 90-180 degrees that I was slowing too much for. I tried trailbraking, left foot braking, lift off throttle oversteer, but none of it really rotated the car. That had to change.

Understeer is seeing the tree that kills you - Kevin Doubleday ©

I put on my hoonigan hat and rediscovered my handbrake... Everything changed. The car rotated on command, as you'd expect. Despite watching lots of rally runs over the years and knowing that that's what it takes, it still took getting some used to. Drifting through a turn is foreign to a road racer. It isn't the quickest way around, as much fun as it could be. But this was even FAR more fun. Although I massively enjoy track driving and don't just do it for lap times, I tend to get carried away with competitiveness so I don't waste time. Drifting wastes time so I don't do it. Imagine if you HAD to slide around to go faster. I was giddy.

Once I got comfortable sliding the car around through the cones with the handbrake, I started working on better control. The technique that worked best was a combination of new and old; lift off on turn in - that transfers weight up front, front tires bite a bit better on turn in, and rear tires are unloaded - then you pull the handbrake. The car is very eager to rotate since the back tires are already unloaded. Carry opposite lock, commit to the go-fast-pedal, and hope the front tires pull you where you want to go. The result? 62.43 s. I chopped off nearly 3 seconds off my time. I was very pleased... until I saw that best-in-class had also dropped to 56.68 s.

Setting up for a turn with one hand on the wheel, one hand on the handbrake - Kevin Doubleday ©

I still had a lot to improve, but here's the thing: at the end of the day, I was still a beginner. I do have a fairly decent understanding of car dynamics and controls and I am very comfortable with pushing a car to its limits, but, unless you're a prodigy (I'm not), that's not a replacement for seat time (practice). I felt like I had got the hang of what I'm supposed to do, I just had to know exactly when and how much to do it. Since the course is laid out in cones and changes every time, everyone spends the day learning the course and improving, but I had spent the day just learning how to drive fast on gravel. My best time was a whopping 5.75 s off competitive pace. With that said, if you allow 3.5 seconds for tires - midway of the range I was told I should expect - I should be 'only' 2.25 s off pace. That is an eternity on such a short course, but I figured it wasn't too bad for my first time.

I left the day feeling fairly confident that I had figured out what I'm supposed to do, I just needed to do it better and more consistently. Knowing I would need better tires, I already had some lined up but I wanted to benchmark what the car is like as it sat to put a number to it. I found a set of used VW Passat steel wheels with used Federal winter tires.

Nearly bald Aeolus... something all season tire (bottom) vs well used Federal Himalaya WS2 winter tires (top).

Although the tires aren't great winter tires to start with and had less than 40% tread left, I couldn't pass up on the deal since it saved me the trouble of switching the tires on the factory alloys, I just had to switch the wheels. I felt better about beating up on the steel wheels, plus they are narrower so they should allow me to go with a narrower, taller tire down the road for better grip. The wheels were in good shape too, so they alone were worth almost the full price I paid for the wheels and tires. I still expected the tires to still be a huge improvement over the all seasons despite the quality and wear. I couldn't wait to get back out. The following rallycross event was only two weeks after. That time, there was snow in the forecast. Make sure to like below so you don't miss updates on how the car is doing the rest of the season!


Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!





Comments







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would

GTR vs Evo X vs STI: which has the best AWD system?

A few weeks ago, I made a post explaining  mainstream AWD system types and how they compare , pros and cons, etc. including some simple diagrams to show where the power goes and how much. As promised, this post will focus on specific cars and what AWD systems they use, especially ones that that have more or less been defined by their AWD systems, and the best place to start may be with a bombshell; the Nissan GT-R. Nissan GT-R (R35) The GT-R has built a reputation around having monster traction and very approachable performance, thanks to its AWD system - Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain (ATTESA) - and what it can do for you. But the GT-R doesn't actually use the most mechanically sophisticated type of AWD systems discussed in the previous article, namely a "true" AWD with a centre differential. Instead, it uses a clutch pack to transfer power. RWD-based clutch-type AWD schematic - Rams Eye The Track Guy © The R32, R33, and R34 Sky

How would a Mustang 3.5L EcoBoost compare to the 5.0L V8?

Ever wonder how a 3.5 litre EcoBoost might fair against the 5.0 litre V8 in the Mustang? Of course you have. Ever since Ford dropped it in the F150 (and perhaps well before), everyone has been wondering how it would perform. There are basically two camps; those who think it would be awesome because of tuneability and power potential and those who think it means the death of the V8 in the Mustang. If you are in the latter group, we seem to be good so far with continuous upgrades to the 5.0 litre Coyote and the brand new Shelby GT500 which still uses a supercharged V8 as it has been for over a decade and multiple iterations. But what if... Well, it seems we are closer than ever to finding out the answer to that question. American Trucks recently got together two crew cab, short box, 4x4 F150's but one has the 5.0 litre V8 and the other has the 3.5 litre EcoBoost V6. There has been a few comparisons between 5.0 litre and 3.5 litre EB F150's, but this seems to be the most di

Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R Track Review

2012 Boss 302 on square 305/30/19 RE-71R's at AMP - Graham MacNeil © For better or for worse, I have heard and read so much about RE-71R's. Everyone swears by the grip but complains about the wear. Generally speaking, the pros are: 1. They grip as well or better than most R comps. 2. They don't wear as quickly as R comps if driven occasionally on the street. 3. They work better in the rain than R comps. The cons were limited to overheating quickly when used on track (being an autocross tire) and wearing too fast on heavy cars like mine. In the popular 200 TW category, they are faster than the popular Hankook RS-4's and BFGoodrich Rival S's according to published Tire Rack Tests. According to plenty of reviews, they are also faster than well established R comps like R888R's (which don't seem to work too well on heavy cars anyway) and the venerable NT01's. But I was still hesitant for a while until I talked to a tire tech support gentleman