Skip to main content

The $1.4 Million Porsche 911 That You've Probably Never Heard Of

I'm sure there are some out there who would think that messing with the iconic 911 shape is blasphemy. But for the rest of us, this 911 may just be the prettiest 911 ever made. The reason you probably have never heard of it is because only one was ever made and it was built over 50 years ago.

Back in the early 911 days (i.e. 1960's-1970's), Porsche didn't make a 911 Cabriolet. The engineers in Stuttgart didn't think they could design a convertible version (or perhaps feasibly build one) that would meet the American National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) rollover safety regulations, which is part of the reason the 911 Targa exists.

Since the American market was quite important to Porsche as far as sales and profitability of the 911, a convertible wasn't built back then. It wasn't until 1981 that Porsche showed the world a concept 911 Cabriolet at the Frankfurt Motor Show and a production version didn't come out until late 1982 as a 1983 model year. This may not seem like much of an issue... unless you're a huge Porsche enthusiast living in California (with a big bag of money to spend).

Johnny von Neumann met that exact description. Johnny wasn't just any Porsche fan with a lot of cash, though. He was fully immersed in motorsports and even helped arrange a hill climb in 1948 and an open road race. He also (successfully) raced Porsches and Ferraris and was the US West Coast distributor for Porsche and VW at the time (you can read more about him on Hemmings Sports & Exotic Car). As you might imagine, someone like that wouldn't be interested in simply hacking the roof off of a 911. He wanted it done properly.

What he didn't want, though, was to build just one for himself. He believed there would be a market for a car like this, especially in California, so he didn't even just take a production 911 and properly modified it. Instead, he went to Porsche and got a bare 911 chassis, then took it to Italian coachwork legend Nuccio Bertone to build him a custom 911 convertible. That's right. This is a 911 styled by Bertone.

Johnny funded the whole project himself and was hoping to eventually put it into production, provided that Porsche agrees. Judging by the looks, Bertone had full liberty in the design and, short of the Porsche and 911 badges (and perhaps the swollen rear end to the keen eye), you'd never guess this was anything but a beautiful Italian drop-top.

Inside, the instrumentation and some of the switch gear were repurposed, but it is a clear and exquisite departure from the functional utilitarian interior of a classic 911, never mind that some of the dials ended up buried six feet under and behind the gear shifter... Bertone kept all the mechanicals, though, but some of it was upgraded over the years.

The engine is the 2.0 litre flat six from the 911S with twin Weber carburetors making 160 hp and the wheels are off of a 914/6 (Mahle Gas Burner wheels for the Porsche aficionados). When it was all done, it debuted at the 1966 Geneva Motor Show as the Porsche 911 Spyder.

A revelation; a 911 with enough room in the back to actually work on it!

Unfortunately, no one placed any orders for it so Porsche canned the project. Johnny took the only one that Bertone had built back home with him. As you'd expect, it exchanged hands a number of times over the years, presumably privately, but it ended up on sale at the GOODING & COMPANY 2018 Pebble Beach (California) Auction. Prior to the auction, GOODING & COMPANY estimated it would go for somewhere between $700,000 and a cool $1M, but it ended up selling for nearly 50% more than the highest they thought it would go for; a much cooler $1,430,000.

That may not seem like a whole lot in a world where Ferrari 250 GTO's seem to break their own records year after year, an example of which most recently sold at auction for $48.4 million. But a classic car selling for over $1 million at auction is actually not an every day achievement and the sale price makes it one of the most expensive 911's ever sold, so it is in an elite group of cars. It is certainly a one-of-a-kind, and a gorgeous one at that.

Although far less expensive than the Ferrari 250 GTO (and it has exactly zero racing pedigree), it is actually more rare being the only one in existence and the only one ever built, so it is quite a special car. That said, I'm sure it isn't to everyone's taste. What do you think? Is this a marriage made in heaven between German engineering and Italian styling, or it's the ruination of an automotive icon; the 911 shape?

Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!


Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.

Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.

🔥 Most Visited This Week

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would

GTR vs Evo X vs STI: which has the best AWD system?

A few weeks ago, I made a post explaining  mainstream AWD system types and how they compare , pros and cons, etc. including some simple diagrams to show where the power goes and how much. As promised, this post will focus on specific cars and what AWD systems they use, especially ones that that have more or less been defined by their AWD systems, and the best place to start may be with a bombshell; the Nissan GT-R. Nissan GT-R (R35) The GT-R has built a reputation around having monster traction and very approachable performance, thanks to its AWD system - Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain (ATTESA) - and what it can do for you. But the GT-R doesn't actually use the most mechanically sophisticated type of AWD systems discussed in the previous article, namely a "true" AWD with a centre differential. Instead, it uses a clutch pack to transfer power. RWD-based clutch-type AWD schematic - Rams Eye The Track Guy © The R32, R33, and R34 Sky

How would a Mustang 3.5L EcoBoost compare to the 5.0L V8?

Ever wonder how a 3.5 litre EcoBoost might fair against the 5.0 litre V8 in the Mustang? Of course you have. Ever since Ford dropped it in the F150 (and perhaps well before), everyone has been wondering how it would perform. There are basically two camps; those who think it would be awesome because of tuneability and power potential and those who think it means the death of the V8 in the Mustang. If you are in the latter group, we seem to be good so far with continuous upgrades to the 5.0 litre Coyote and the brand new Shelby GT500 which still uses a supercharged V8 as it has been for over a decade and multiple iterations. But what if... Well, it seems we are closer than ever to finding out the answer to that question. American Trucks recently got together two crew cab, short box, 4x4 F150's but one has the 5.0 litre V8 and the other has the 3.5 litre EcoBoost V6. There has been a few comparisons between 5.0 litre and 3.5 litre EB F150's, but this seems to be the most di

Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R Track Review

2012 Boss 302 on square 305/30/19 RE-71R's at AMP - Graham MacNeil © For better or for worse, I have heard and read so much about RE-71R's. Everyone swears by the grip but complains about the wear. Generally speaking, the pros are: 1. They grip as well or better than most R comps. 2. They don't wear as quickly as R comps if driven occasionally on the street. 3. They work better in the rain than R comps. The cons were limited to overheating quickly when used on track (being an autocross tire) and wearing too fast on heavy cars like mine. In the popular 200 TW category, they are faster than the popular Hankook RS-4's and BFGoodrich Rival S's according to published Tire Rack Tests. According to plenty of reviews, they are also faster than well established R comps like R888R's (which don't seem to work too well on heavy cars anyway) and the venerable NT01's. But I was still hesitant for a while until I talked to a tire tech support gentleman