Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

The New Mustang Mach 1 Heads to Dealers. Here's why it matters.

2021 ford mustang Mach 1

No, it's not because it's called Mach 1 or the heritage that comes with the name, although that's pretty cool for Mustang fans. There are few cars out there that have the widespread track use of Mustangs. A combination of affordability, a decent RWD platform with endless aftermarket support and the potential to be competitive when properly set up makes them a staple in most track paddocks in North America. But being popular for track use comes with some headaches for manufacturers. It means that the car will be pushed hard by its customers and that will inevitably lead to discovering weak links . 

The vast majority of factory main-stream performance cars have limitations on track when pushed to hot lapping pace. That's not to say they are all equal - some are, without a doubt, far more durable and dependable than others - but nearly all require modifications. Mustangs are no exception. And their popularity also means those weak links are discovered fast, and marketing departments playing fast and loose with "track ready", "race car for the road", and similar claims make matters worse for manufacturers. 

1969 to 2021 Mustang Mach 1

Bring up track-driven or track driving Mustangs, and you'll likely find two camps... the camp that says Mustangs are useless on track because of [insert any number of limitations] and the other that says it is the best out there and all it needs are a few mods. The reality, however, is somewhere in between, as is always the case with hyperboles. That's where the Mach 1 comes in.

Tremec in, Getrag out

After over 11 long years of customers complaining and griping since the first generation Coyote 5.0 litre V8 showed up in the MY 2011 Mustang GT, Ford has finally returned to Tremec for a trans to put behind the 5.0 litre V8; a Tremec 3160, same unit as the one in the Shelby GT350 and GT350R, although ratios might be different. That "somewhere in between" has all of a sudden got much better.

2021 Mustang Mach 1 Interior Recaro

The Getrag MT-82 was not a weak trans overall but had a number of weak links that manifested themselves especially when pushed hard. Judging by the most common complaint which is missed shifts at high rpms, including my own experience and how it improved, the most likely cause of the problem is a clutch that favoured modulation and light effort for streetability, therefore sacrificing proper engagement at high load/rpms. Combine that with a remote shifter that was not as rigid as it should be to provide better NVH, and missed shifts were all too common. 

There are other complaints, namely broken shift forks or synchro's but it doesn't matter where you stand on those. I doubt they are the root cause of the problem or failures. The lock out is likely a result of twisting/misalignment in the trans due to torque and g forces (I essentially only ever experienced it in turns) combined with the slack in the shifter. This lock out and imperfect engagement in the clutch at high rpms would put unnecessary load on syncrhos and forks, a very likely cause for premature failure, plus it is possible that a few failures are simply unavoidable due to manufacturing defects - warranty items like in every car - that are made worse due to the bad rep of the trans. When I replaced my clutch, the problem virtually disappeared.

2021 Mustang Mach 1 front grille

Regardless of the reason, the departure from the MT-82 is something that cannot be overstated. Ford has made several special editions and performance packages - namely Brembo, Track Pack, Performance Pack, and Performance Pack Level 2 - that all kept it and even a couple of fairly special models like the Boss 302 (S197) and the Bullitt (S550 using the revised MT82-D4) that all still kept the trans, which makes this switch even more welcome. And that's not all.

The Good Stuff

Sift through the marketing mumbo jumbo and you'll find lots of good upgrades. Another complaint from quick drivers is heating issues on the PPL2, particularly the rear diff. That should be no more at least for street cars (i.e. not race prepped). The new one will finally come with a diff cooler, another first for a 5.0 litre Mustang. Trans also gets cooling and there is increased oil cooling by 50%, with increased capacity in the form of an air to oil heat exchanger instead of relying on the coolant to oil which some people call an "oil heater" since it can't keep the oil cool if the coolant temperature isn't low enough. 

2021 mustang mach 1 side shot mesh wheels

And as usual, you get a whole bunch of suspension improvements namely:

- stiffer anti-roll bars
- stiffer front springs
- recalibrated ABS, power steering, and AdvanceTrac, 
- retuned magnetic dampers (MagneRide in Ford speak)
- stiffer rear subframe bushings and toe links from the GT500
- 6-pisten brembo front calipers and larger brake booster from the PPL2
- revised spoiler/pan cover with additional underside airfoils and passages to increase downforce and brake cooling
- 22% more downforce than the standard GT with the Performance Pack
- 3.73 rear end with Torsen LSD
- strut tower brace
- stiffer steering shaft
- 19x9.5" front and 19x10" rear wheels wrapped in 255/40/19 and 275/40/19 PS4 tires
- Dual mode exhaust with quad tips (worth the price alone for the noise).

There is also an available Handling Pack, that dials everything up to 11 in the form of more downforce (150% more than a GT PP) and upsized 19x10.5" front and 19x11" wheels in place of the standard 19x9.5" and 19x10" wrapped in 305/30/19 front and 315/30/19 rear tires (likely Michelin Sport Cup 2's like I compared to RE-71R's here). On top of all that, you also get adjustable strut mounts, which Ford lawyers are probably to scared to call camber plates. Cost is $3,500 USD for the Handling Pack, which should've probably come standard.

2021 mustang mach 1 decal

To go with the added grip, cooling, and downforce, Ford slaps the Shelby GT350 intake manifold on to help breathing and power goes up to 480 hp and 420 lb-ft torque which matches the Bullitt. And of course, prerequisite Mach 1 cues including decals, logos, dash plaque, cue ball shift knob, and subtle features so it can be called a Mach 1. Ford says this will be the most capable 5.0 litre ever and I have no doubt that will be the case. They are heading to dealers in Canada and the US now, and it probably won't be long before one of them pops up on your local track. I just hope Ford makes enough of them and dealer mark ups don't stick around...

Follow Rams Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!




Comments

  1. Are there any downforce numbers other than % improvement, and at what speeds this is likely to make a difference for the new Mach-1?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No published numbers, unfortunately. The PP2 package makes 60 lb. at 80 mph. The GT350R made 300 lb. and the GT500 with the Track Pack makes 550 lb according to an early interview with FP on Hot Rod mag. I would expect the Mach 1 to land somewhere between the GT350R and the PP2, although it is a wide range of course.

      Delete

Post a comment







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track load

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity. Grip is noticeably l

Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R Track Review

2012 Boss 302 on square 305/30/19 RE-71R's at AMP - Graham MacNeil © For better or for worse, I have heard and read so much about RE-71R's. Everyone swears by the grip but complains about the wear. Generally speaking, the pros are: 1. They grip as well or better than most R comps. 2. They don't wear as quickly as R comps if driven occasionally on the street. 3. They work better in the rain than R comps. The cons were limited to overheating quickly when used on track (being an autocross tire) and wearing too fast on heavy cars like mine. In the popular 200 TW category, they are faster than the popular Hankook RS-4's and BFGoodrich Rival S's according to published Tire Rack Tests. According to plenty of reviews, they are also faster than well established R comps like R888R's (which don't seem to work too well on heavy cars anyway) and the venerable NT01's. But I was still hesitant for a while until I talked to a tire tech support gentleman