Skip to main content

2013 Cadillac XTS AWD Platinum - A Closer Look

In a 2-page, 10-paragraph, car review of a luxury sedan, Car & Driver failed to review much of the car besides the CUE (Cadillac User Experience) infotainment system. They go on and on to complain about the CUE system but they mention very little about the engine and ride of the car. There are basically only two paragraphs that talk about the engine and the suspension.

I can't say whether the CUE system is as bad as they say because I haven't tried it yet. However, in their review of the engine, they only mention two aspects; the hp output of the engine (304 hp) and the 0-60 mph time, which is 7.2 seconds. They then criticize the performance for being only adequate and move on. In the next paragraph, they criticize the suspension for not being as sporty as the ATS and a numb, light steering feel but say it has a nice balance between body control and comfort.

I do agree that the straight line performance is only adequate but I'm not sure why that's a problem. For a long time, Rolls Royce had a tradition of rating the output of their engines simply as "adequate", because that's all you need in a big luxury car. If it's not sports luxury, adequate power is enough. Very few people would argue about the Mercedes S-Class being a true luxury car. It is one of the most recognized large luxury cars (if not the most recognized) and one of the most prestigious as well. I remember reading Motor Trend's review of the Mercedes S350 BlueTEC 4MATIC (Mercedes lingo for AWD) diesel. They raved about it and said that it may be the one to have in the S-Class lineup, despite having much more powerful engine choices. 

Additional power over what the Cadillac XTS AWD and Mercedes S350 BlueTEC 4MATIC offer is very rarely, if at all, needed on the road. The Cadillac is just a little slower to 60 mph than the Mercedes (7.2 vs 7.0 seconds) but it is quicker midrange - 5 mph to 60 mph is dealt with in 7.6 seconds in the Cadillac vs 8.6 seconds in the Mercedes. Some people will disagree about that being enough. What I'm sure everyone will agree about, though, is that how quickly the engine propels a car from 0-60 mph isn't the only important piece of information. How smooth are the transmission shifts? Does it hunt for gears? How quiet is the engine? Does it feel refined? Does the engine seem happy across the rpm range or strong and smooth only in a certain range? These and many other aspects of the drivetrain are more important than a 0-60 mph time, especially in a luxury sedan, but there was no mention of them. It doesn't get much better for the suspension review.

They say the suspension "nicely mixes body control and comfort" which sounds great to me but they think it is lacking. Why must a large luxury sedan that's designed to carry people in luxury and comfort, not canyon carving, handle like a compact sporty luxury car like the Cadillac ATS? Shoppers of the Cadillac XTS and other large luxury sedans are more interested in a comfortable and composed chassis, not going to autocross them or hunting for the perfect stretch of back roads to push the car around. How well does it soak up bumps? How does it transmit bump noises into the cabin? How does it drive at high speeds? Like the engine review, they focused on one aspect they don't like (the suspension not being very sporty), and did not give a detailed review of other more important aspects.

If you look close enough though and try to find the more important details about the car, you can. Judging by how critical they were of every aspect they didn't like, it is safe to assume that the engine and transmission are refined and well matched to the car. It is very quiet and comfortable, without being floaty. It out brakes and out handles the S350 BlueTEC without punishing its occupants and although it's nearly 700 lb lighter, it does not sacrifice space in the cabin or in the trunk. It has almost every safety and convenience feature you can find in a car today. The cabin is well designed and covered in fine materials - finer than those found in a Mercedes CL63 AMG, according to Motor Trend's first drive review. Car & Driver thinks it's adequate luxury. I think it's plenty of luxury with sufficient power. What do you think?


Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.

Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.

🔥 Most Visited This Week

Falken Azenis RT615k+ Street and Track Review

Last year, I picked up a 2009 Lancer Ralliart to do a long term test with it as a dual duty track/daily. One of the first things I knew I was going to do was put a decent set of tires on it. The car came without OEM wheels which was actually good because I didn't have to hesitate about getting a good set of aftermarket wheels to support going wider. Thankfully, my friends at YST Auto Halifax  set me up with a great set of Superspeed RF03RR wheels. The Wheels I had never even heard of Superspeed but I trusted the good folk at YST Auto who mentioned some customer cars running on track with them. These wheels are rotary forged which is basically a prerequisite to be taken seriously in this market populated by companies like TSW and Fast Wheels. The wheels looked like a high quality, well finished wheel and each had a "QC" check sticker on. Just for appearances? Maybe, but I found no defects. The wheels seemed easy to balance (didn't need many weights) and at 18.1 lb. f

How would a Mustang 3.5L EcoBoost compare to the 5.0L V8?

Ever wonder how a 3.5 litre EcoBoost might fair against the 5.0 litre V8 in the Mustang? Of course you have. Ever since Ford dropped it in the F150 (and perhaps well before), everyone has been wondering how it would perform. There are basically two camps; those who think it would be awesome because of tuneability and power potential and those who think it means the death of the V8 in the Mustang. If you are in the latter group, we seem to be good so far with continuous upgrades to the 5.0 litre Coyote and the brand new Shelby GT500 which still uses a supercharged V8 as it has been for over a decade and multiple iterations. But what if... Well, it seems we are closer than ever to finding out the answer to that question. American Trucks recently got together two crew cab, short box, 4x4 F150's but one has the 5.0 litre V8 and the other has the 3.5 litre EcoBoost V6. There has been a few comparisons between 5.0 litre and 3.5 litre EB F150's, but this seems to be the most di

GTR vs Evo X vs STI: which has the best AWD system?

A few weeks ago, I made a post explaining  mainstream AWD system types and how they compare , pros and cons, etc. including some simple diagrams to show where the power goes and how much. As promised, this post will focus on specific cars and what AWD systems they use, especially ones that that have more or less been defined by their AWD systems, and the best place to start may be with a bombshell; the Nissan GT-R. Nissan GT-R (R35) The GT-R has built a reputation around having monster traction and very approachable performance, thanks to its AWD system - Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain (ATTESA) - and what it can do for you. But the GT-R doesn't actually use the most mechanically sophisticated type of AWD systems discussed in the previous article, namely a "true" AWD with a centre differential. Instead, it uses a clutch pack to transfer power. RWD-based clutch-type AWD schematic - Rams Eye The Track Guy © The R32, R33, and R34 Sky

Juns Subaru BRZ - 2.4 litre Synergy V8

Meet Juns Subaru BRZ. If the traditional power adding methods like forced induction or dropping a small block V8 aren't your thing, this may be it (although I imagine swapping a small block V8 into something small is typically a North American - and awesome - solution, but I digress). This one does have a V8 but it's a very different kind of V8 and, at $70,000, it will cost you a multiple of that but you will no doubt have something very unique. The engine is based on two Kawasaki Ninja ZX-12R engines and has a displacement of 2.4 litres. Power? 356 hp at 10,680 rpm, a whopping 156 hp over stock, although torque gets a much more modest jump to 199 lb-ft, "only" 48 lb-ft over stock. This frankenstein engine is the work of Synery Power in New Zealand, which developed the engine for midget car speedway racing but they have wanted to put it in a street car. I would imagine the experience might be similar to a rotary engine, making a lot of power but all very h