Skip to main content

Car and Driver's Lightning Lap 2013 - A Closer Look

They've finally posted it! The 2013 Lightning Lap feature is finally available online (full article: Lightning Lap 2013: Hot Cars, Hot Track, Hot Laps). I know it has been available in the February issue but I don't buy the magazine so I haven't been able to read it until today. It is kind of bittersweet for me though. You see, I love the Lightning Lap feature. They test all the performance vehicles that either came out or were upgraded the year before. This makes it a very exciting event/test but it also means that there is only 1 Lightning Lap feature in a year, so I am both excited for the new one and disappointed that I have to wait for a year for the next one. Anyhow, for road racers and track day veterans, it is a great test (or set of tests).

There are many reasons why the Lightning Lap feature is great IMO. Except for the SUV class, which includes vehicles like the Jeep SRT and BMW X5 M regardless of prices, cars are divided in classes depending on price ranges. This is very helpful, especially if you're shopping for a good track car with a budget because you can zero in on the specific price range and look at lap times and reviews. The reviews are also short and sweet. Car reviews don't get right to the point any more than this. They highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each car and summarize their subjective driving impressions - that's it. If you want to modify and don't know where to start, knowing weaknesses can help pointing you in the right direction and having so many reviews in one place makes it that much easier. And last but certainly not least, knowing lap times earns bragging rights.. if your favourite car (or the car you've just bought last summer) posts a quick lap. That's not always the case though. The Lightning Lap can bring just as much shame and disappointment as it can pride for cars that fail to meet their expectations.

There are many fast times and many "slow" times, but only very few are truly impressive or disappointing. It's important to note that picking a car as an impressive or disappointing one doesn't mean it is the quickest or slowest in class. It just means that, in my opinion, the car posted either better or worse lap times than their specifications might suggest.

The Highs (by class):

LLOINK (cop cars): Dodge Charger Pursuit - The Dodge Charger Pursuit was very impressive, turning in a lap time of 3:17.8. This time beats the last generation, more powerful Charger SRT8 despite all the extra weight of the police gear and nearly matches the 3:17.5 time of the much more sporty Infiniti G37 Coupe Sport despite (the Infiniti) having a better power-to-weight ratio. Better not try to outrun this one!

LL2 ($30,000-$59,000): Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE - The high here is clearly the Camaro SS 1LE. With a price tag under $40,000 and without a power bump over a run-of-the-mill Camaro SS, it is amazing how far some suspension changes can go. Forget the Boss 302 LS, which this Camaro was meant to go against (and beats by just over a second). This Camaro manages to just beat the near race-ready 2007 Porsche 911 GT3 and barely loses to GM's first iteration of the mighty C6 Z06 - the 2006 Corvette Z06. Think this is not fast enough for a heavy Camaro? Car & Driver said they made a couple of downshifting mistakes and they think that with a fresh set of tires and a completely clean lap, the Camaro could post a sub 3 minute lap which puts it in a very elite group. 

The Lows (by class):

LL1 (up to $29,999): Ford Focus ST - For me, the disappointment here is the Focus ST, with a lap time of 3:21.4. I had high hopes for this car, especially after reading about how well it handles. I am not really sure what is letting this car down but the car missed the second day of lapping, which usually is the day they record their fastest laps and that's very possible since you can record better lap times the more familiar you get with the car. 

They are suggesting that the engine may also have hurt the lap times, providing less torque midrange than its 252 lb-ft rating may suggest. I doubt that that's the main reason though. While the torque range may be weaker than expected, it is still plenty. They think the lack of a mechanical limited slip differential may have hurt lap times as they found the brake-based limited-slip-differential-effect didn't hold up to track abuse and still sent the inside front wheel spinning and wasting power. The brake-based limited slip function has been criticized by many and its shortcomings are no surprise. I think the lack of a true limited slip differential and missing second day lapping are what really hurt the lap times. I wouldn't be surprised if, with more seat time on the track and a true limited slip differential, the Focus ST may be well under the 3:20 mark.

LL3 ($60,000 - $119,999): BMW M5 - The BMW M5 was definitely a low in my opinion. This new twin-turbocharged M-badged BMW is no slouch but the latest iteration of the M5 loses to the Audi RS5 and the now-over-4-years old LSA powered CTS-V. Lap times aren't everything though, so what about driving feel? "The M5's brake pedal lacks tactility, so we struggled to find the ideal braking points," they said, "the brakes never failed, but their inconsistent performance shook our confidence." The brakes were strong one lap and weak another. It understeers and provides little communication from the front wheels to the steering wheel and it feels pointlessly hefty (which usually means the steering weight feels artificial). 

The latest and greatest from BMW's M-division understeers? Althought unacceptable for an M car, I could maybe understand if they tuned some understeer to tone it down and make it appeal to a larger market. But why the inconsistent braking feel? And the elephant in the room, why the lack of communication and steering feel in a BMW M car? Oh, and it's about 200 lb heavier than the Cadillac CTS-V sedan. The BMW M5, which used to be the benchmark for a family sports sedan, is an overweight, understeering BMW that lacks braking and steering finesse. Something is seriously wrong here. 

LL5 ($240,000 and above): Lexus LFA - The only entry in this year's super expensive class - the Lexus LFA. With a best lap time of 2:55.1, it is far from slow but after looking at other lap times, it becomes apparent why it is disappointing. For example, the Camaro ZL1 is only 2.4 seconds slower, despite being nearly 600 lb heavier and not much more powerful - the Lexus actually has a better weight to power ratio of 6.45 lb/hp vs the Camaro's 7.10. The Lexus is purpose built from the ground up with a bespoke chassis and engine and, according to Lexus, took 10 years to develop from concept to production ready. It seems like it should pull a much a greater lead, especially considering its almost ridiculous price tag of nearly $400,000. This would definitely be disappointing to (the few) Lexus owners who are car enthusiasts.

Honourable Mentions:

LL2 ($30,000 - $59,999): Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 - it's a Camaro that's as fast as a (last generation) 911 Turbo S while maintaining perfect street manners and comfort, thanks to excellent chassis tuning and magnetic shocks. Enough said. Did I mention that it's quicker than the Mercedes Benz SLS AMG?

LL3 ($60,000 - $119,999): Mercedes Benz C63 AMG Black Series - besides the awesome "Black Series" name, AMG has shown that they can build more than unapologetic, oversteering, loud and powerful Merc's. They wanted to build an excellent and balanced track car and they certainly did. 

LL3 ($60,000 - $119,999): Ferrari 458 Italia - while it is never a surprise when a Ferrari posts a great lap time, the Ferrari simply earns the spot because of what the Ferrari engineer announced when they received the car for testing. He said it "Is-a okay if you crash-a de car.. as-a long as you get a good lap-a time." Only a person speaking for Ferrari would say that.

2008 LL1 (up to $29,999): Chevrolet Cobalt SS - the turbocharged Cobalt SS, which has been out of production for over 2 years and is over 5 years old, is still the people's champion. It still holds the second fastest lap time ever in the (least expensive) class and beats several cars from the next class up. It is second only to the 2011 Mustang V6 and 2006 Nissan 350Z Track, both of which are only 0.5 seconds quicker, several thousand dollars more expensive and RWD. Plus, after accounting for inflation, the 350Z Track would actually move up into the next class.

2012 LL2 ($30,000 - $59,999): Ford Mustang Boss 302 Laguna Seca - Although it loses to the Camaro SS 1LE and ZL1, it still holds one of the quickest lap times in the class - 3:02.8. It is only beat by those two Camaros and a couple of Corvettes in its class and beats several cars from higher price brackets. The sound and driving experience are world class and I suspect it should have no problem shaving a couple of seconds off its time with simple modifications. In their review, they said the car has too much rear end grip, which is unsurprising considering the Torsen differential, wide rear wheels and staggered tire setup. This probably hurt front end bite and turn in. The tires could have probably hurt the lap times too as the stock tires don't take too well to heat cycling so they probably lost grip after the first day, which could affect the best lap time since they usually record their quickest times on the second day. With a set of tires that are sticky as the stockers but take better to heat cycling and a square tire setup, I wouldn't be surprised if this Mustang can pull a 3:00.x time or even break into the very elite sub-3-second group. 

Overall though, I think it was a great Lightning Lap. There are some cars that I would have liked to see but weren't tested. There's always next year though so hopefully we will see them. Are there cars that you would have liked to see but they weren't tested? Which cars do you think were the most impressive or disappointing?

Source: Car and Driver.


  1. The post you written is very good and it entails many useful information for me about driving. I am happy to find your great way of writing the post. Now you make it easy for me to understand and implement the concept.
    Driving Lessons

  2. So nice info, very informatife, great

  3. I am very much delighted with this post since it gives me a better knowledge about driving. Hope to read more informative articles from you.


Post a Comment

Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.

Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.

🔥 Most Visited This Week

Falken Azenis RT615k+ Street and Track Review

Last year, I picked up a 2009 Lancer Ralliart to do a long term test with it as a dual duty track/daily. One of the first things I knew I was going to do was put a decent set of tires on it. The car came without OEM wheels which was actually good because I didn't have to hesitate about getting a good set of aftermarket wheels to support going wider. Thankfully, my friends at YST Auto Halifax  set me up with a great set of Superspeed RF03RR wheels. The Wheels I had never even heard of Superspeed but I trusted the good folk at YST Auto who mentioned some customer cars running on track with them. These wheels are rotary forged which is basically a prerequisite to be taken seriously in this market populated by companies like TSW and Fast Wheels. The wheels looked like a high quality, well finished wheel and each had a "QC" check sticker on. Just for appearances? Maybe, but I found no defects. The wheels seemed easy to balance (didn't need many weights) and at 18.1 lb. f

How would a Mustang 3.5L EcoBoost compare to the 5.0L V8?

Ever wonder how a 3.5 litre EcoBoost might fair against the 5.0 litre V8 in the Mustang? Of course you have. Ever since Ford dropped it in the F150 (and perhaps well before), everyone has been wondering how it would perform. There are basically two camps; those who think it would be awesome because of tuneability and power potential and those who think it means the death of the V8 in the Mustang. If you are in the latter group, we seem to be good so far with continuous upgrades to the 5.0 litre Coyote and the brand new Shelby GT500 which still uses a supercharged V8 as it has been for over a decade and multiple iterations. But what if... Well, it seems we are closer than ever to finding out the answer to that question. American Trucks recently got together two crew cab, short box, 4x4 F150's but one has the 5.0 litre V8 and the other has the 3.5 litre EcoBoost V6. There has been a few comparisons between 5.0 litre and 3.5 litre EB F150's, but this seems to be the most di

GTR vs Evo X vs STI: which has the best AWD system?

A few weeks ago, I made a post explaining  mainstream AWD system types and how they compare , pros and cons, etc. including some simple diagrams to show where the power goes and how much. As promised, this post will focus on specific cars and what AWD systems they use, especially ones that that have more or less been defined by their AWD systems, and the best place to start may be with a bombshell; the Nissan GT-R. Nissan GT-R (R35) The GT-R has built a reputation around having monster traction and very approachable performance, thanks to its AWD system - Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain (ATTESA) - and what it can do for you. But the GT-R doesn't actually use the most mechanically sophisticated type of AWD systems discussed in the previous article, namely a "true" AWD with a centre differential. Instead, it uses a clutch pack to transfer power. RWD-based clutch-type AWD schematic - Rams Eye The Track Guy © The R32, R33, and R34 Sky

Juns Subaru BRZ - 2.4 litre Synergy V8

Meet Juns Subaru BRZ. If the traditional power adding methods like forced induction or dropping a small block V8 aren't your thing, this may be it (although I imagine swapping a small block V8 into something small is typically a North American - and awesome - solution, but I digress). This one does have a V8 but it's a very different kind of V8 and, at $70,000, it will cost you a multiple of that but you will no doubt have something very unique. The engine is based on two Kawasaki Ninja ZX-12R engines and has a displacement of 2.4 litres. Power? 356 hp at 10,680 rpm, a whopping 156 hp over stock, although torque gets a much more modest jump to 199 lb-ft, "only" 48 lb-ft over stock. This frankenstein engine is the work of Synery Power in New Zealand, which developed the engine for midget car speedway racing but they have wanted to put it in a street car. I would imagine the experience might be similar to a rotary engine, making a lot of power but all very h