Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

The Camaro Z/28 is back!




The refreshed look of the Camaro that's supposed to keep it hot until the next generation is good for sales. The car looks sharper and the rear ends digs deep into Chevy's heritage - the 1967 Chevrolet Impala.. but what's bound to get a lot of people talking is the beast of a machine that is the Camaro Z/28. Chevy means business with this car. No matter how you look at it, this car screams track-ready performance.

On the outside, a larger front splitter and rear spoiler replace the ones used on the run-of-the-mill SS. Flared wheel arches with nearly flush wheels show that the front and rear tracks have been widened. Lightweight 19" wheels are wrapped in massive 305-series tires and larger brake rotors and callipers are clearly visible. But there are even more changes under all the visible upgrades.




There has been rumours towards the end of last year that the 7.0 litre LS7 V8 used in the Corvette Z06 will find its way under the hood of a Camaro. "Leaked" data showed that the engine seems to actually be an option on the Camaro spec sheet.. but it wasn't confirmed until the reveal of the Z/28. The car will come equipped with the LS7 V8 producing "at least" 500 hp and 470 lb-ft of torque. The engine will be mated to a 6-speed Tremec TR6060 manual transmission and I doubt it will be offered with an automatic like the ZL1.

The engine is hand-assembled from top end parts including:

- Titanium intake valves and connecting rods
- Sodium filled exhaust valves for better heat dissipation
- CNC-ported aluminum cylinder heads
- Forged steel crankshaft and main bearing caps
- High-lift camshaft
- Hydroformed exhaust headers
- 10.5-quart dry sump oiling system

All of this allows the engine to use a high 11.0:1 compression ratio and revs up to a 7,000 rpm redline, which is very impressive for a 7.0 litre V8.

While the added power is nothing to sneeze at, Chevy also dropped weight via lightweight wheels, brakes, thinner rear panel glass and more. Full details about the upgrades haven't been revealed but what is confirmed is that the Z/28 will be about 300 lb. lighter than the supercharged Camaro ZL1. This should mean that it weighs about the same as a base manual Camaro SS, despite having larger brakes, wheels, and tires, aero enhancements and (no doubt) larger radiator and cooling for the transmission and differential.




On the inside, excellent Recaro seats await the driver and a meaty flat-bottom steering wheel that looks to be wrapped in suede. Air conditioning has been made a stand alone option so that those who just want to save as much weight as possible and focus on track performance can keep it out.




To help put the power down, huge 305/30ZR19 ultra high performance Pirelli PZero Trofeo R tires (first on a production car) wrap the 19" lightweight forged wheels. That size tire is also believed to be the widest used on the front of any production car. Behind the wheels and tires sit massive brakes front and back to shed off speed when needed. On the front, 394 x 36 mm brembo Carbon Ceramic Matrix™ rotors are matched with 6 piston callipers. On the back, 390 x 32 mm fixed monoblock callipers and 4 piston callipers are utilized. This setup saves about 28 lb. compared to 2-piece steel rotors. Other chassis and suspension revisions have been made which achieve impressive feats such as 1.05 g lateral acceleration around corners and 1.50 g deceleration (that's high!) along with consistent brake feel and performance.




All of the upgrades result in the Z/28 being a whole 3-seconds quicker than the ZL1 on average, according to Chevrolet. In Car and Driver's Lightning Lap 2013, the Camaro ZL1 posted a lap time of 2:57.5. If the 3-second lead holds true on VIR (the track that Car and Driver holds Lightning Lap tests at), the Z/28 could post a lap time of 2:54.5 - that would make it quicker than cars like the 2011 Porsche 911 GT3 RS, Lexus LFA and Ferrari 430 Scuderia all of which are several hundred pounds lighter and have better power-to-weight ratios with the Lexus LFA actually have more gross power. Now that would earn some serious bragging rights..

This is what the Camaro lineup needed all along. Although the Camaro SS 1LE has already posted better lap times than the Boss 302 Laguna Seca, it didn't seem to have grabbed as much interest or improved the image of the Camaro lineup as much as the Boss 302 did. It could be because the Boss 302 was first to the party as the very quick naturally aspirated car. It could be that the Boss 302 was more track focused and got its own engine while the Camaro had to do with only suspension upgrades (which were very effective). It could even be as simple as more effective advertising by Ford. Whatever the case may be, the Camaro Z/28 is very different from the SS 1LE and should do the same to the Camaro lineup as did the Boss 302 to the Mustang lineup. Will Ford and Chrysler (SRT) have an answer to this? I doubt they will let this go without a competitor. This is a great time to be a car enthusiast!

Source: Slash Gear and Chevrolet

Comments

  1. The Camaro is stylish and presents a new look. I like the wheels which offers high performance, quality and just a glimpse makes me want to try this ride. The unique designs perfect and suitable for this Camaro. For a new design in the market this is awesome work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 2014 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28. He's emblematic with improved aerodynamic performance and stability at high speeds.

    Chevrolet unveiled the redesigned 2014 Camaro line at the Auto Show New York, including the return of the Z/28, the flagship model of Camaro history.

    2014 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 presents a revised exterior design that integrates high performance aerodynamics for a more efficient cooling and stability at high speeds.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would

GTR vs Evo X vs STI: which has the best AWD system?

A few weeks ago, I made a post explaining  mainstream AWD system types and how they compare , pros and cons, etc. including some simple diagrams to show where the power goes and how much. As promised, this post will focus on specific cars and what AWD systems they use, especially ones that that have more or less been defined by their AWD systems, and the best place to start may be with a bombshell; the Nissan GT-R. Nissan GT-R (R35) The GT-R has built a reputation around having monster traction and very approachable performance, thanks to its AWD system - Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain (ATTESA) - and what it can do for you. But the GT-R doesn't actually use the most mechanically sophisticated type of AWD systems discussed in the previous article, namely a "true" AWD with a centre differential. Instead, it uses a clutch pack to transfer power. RWD-based clutch-type AWD schematic - Rams Eye The Track Guy © The R32, R33, and R34 Sky

How would a Mustang 3.5L EcoBoost compare to the 5.0L V8?

Ever wonder how a 3.5 litre EcoBoost might fair against the 5.0 litre V8 in the Mustang? Of course you have. Ever since Ford dropped it in the F150 (and perhaps well before), everyone has been wondering how it would perform. There are basically two camps; those who think it would be awesome because of tuneability and power potential and those who think it means the death of the V8 in the Mustang. If you are in the latter group, we seem to be good so far with continuous upgrades to the 5.0 litre Coyote and the brand new Shelby GT500 which still uses a supercharged V8 as it has been for over a decade and multiple iterations. But what if... Well, it seems we are closer than ever to finding out the answer to that question. American Trucks recently got together two crew cab, short box, 4x4 F150's but one has the 5.0 litre V8 and the other has the 3.5 litre EcoBoost V6. There has been a few comparisons between 5.0 litre and 3.5 litre EB F150's, but this seems to be the most di

Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R Track Review

2012 Boss 302 on square 305/30/19 RE-71R's at AMP - Graham MacNeil © For better or for worse, I have heard and read so much about RE-71R's. Everyone swears by the grip but complains about the wear. Generally speaking, the pros are: 1. They grip as well or better than most R comps. 2. They don't wear as quickly as R comps if driven occasionally on the street. 3. They work better in the rain than R comps. The cons were limited to overheating quickly when used on track (being an autocross tire) and wearing too fast on heavy cars like mine. In the popular 200 TW category, they are faster than the popular Hankook RS-4's and BFGoodrich Rival S's according to published Tire Rack Tests. According to plenty of reviews, they are also faster than well established R comps like R888R's (which don't seem to work too well on heavy cars anyway) and the venerable NT01's. But I was still hesitant for a while until I talked to a tire tech support gentleman