Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

2014 Corvette Stingray gets 30 mpg, rated at 29 mpg EPA highway!




How does it get 30 mpg, yet it's rated at "only" 29 mpg on the highway? Well, you may remember from an earlier post - Corvette Stingray makes 460 hp! - that one of the new engine technologies for the Corvette is Active Fuel Management (AFM) which saves fuel by shutting down half of the engine's cylinders under light load driving conditions. Many enthusiasts, myself included, were not too sure what to think about the AFM technology from a performance perspective. Will throttle response be delayed or dull to prevent firing up all 8 cylinders? Will the auto transmission shifts be slower or hunt for a higher gear on the highway to activate AFM? These are among the questions that were worrying me but, as it turns out, enthusiasts need not worry.

At the live reveal of the Corvette earlier this year - The Stingray is back! - Chevy announced that the car will be available with a 5-mode Driver Mode Select (DMS) feature which varies attributes like active handling, throttle maps, magnetic ride control and others. The 5 modes are Weather, Eco, Tour, Sport and Track. If you don't want to worry about shutting down 4 cylinders, simply don't select Eco. That's right, the AFM feature is only enabled in Eco mode so if you're going on a long lazy drive and want the added fuel economy, select Eco. If you don't want to worry about the AFM feature, don't go into Eco mode. That's an excellent strategy by Chevy. When equipped with the automatic transmission though, AFM is enabled in all drive modes unless the driver engages manual-shift mode using the steering wheel paddles.

When equipped with the 7-speed manual, the Stingray achieves 28 mpg highway using the EPA test cycle in Tour mode. Using the cycle in Eco mode results in 30 mpg highway. Chevrolet took the average of the two, 29 mpg, and set that as the rating so although it is capable of 30 mpg on the highway, it is rated at 29 mpg. In the city, it gets 17 mpg. Ratings for the automatic are not available yet but will be finalized soon. For comparison, the current Corvette is rated at 16/26 mpg city/highway when equipped with the manual and 15/25 mpg city/highway with the automatic.

These ratings make the Corvette class leading (although that depends on what you consider to be in the same class). The Corvette's closest competitor, in my opinion, is the Porsche 911 Carrera S which makes 400 hp, 60 hp less than the Corvette, but only manages 27 mpg highway. It does beat the Corvette's city rating though. 

Chevrolet pointed out that no other sports car offers comparable power and fuel efficiency. For example, the Jaguar F-Type S makes 495 hp but achieves only 23 mpg highway. The Audi R8 V10 makes 510 hp and achieves 19 mpg highway.

On the other side of the spectrum, the Porsche Cayman achieves 30 mpg but makes only 275 hp while the BMW Z4 sDrive28 achieves 34 mpg but makes only 241 hp, nearly half as much as the Corvette. 

So far, on paper, the Stingray appears to check all the right boxes and then some. How will the hp numbers and EPA ratings translate into real world performance numbers? Stay tuned to find out once the car is tested!

Source: Chevrolet


Comments







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track load...

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity. Grip is noticeably l...

Kawasaki Ninja H2R - 300 hp and Supercharged

Okay, this isn't a car but there's a reason why I'm writing about it. It has a supercharged 1.0 litre engine makes 296 hp. 296 hp may not be too impressive in a car but one has to remember that this isn't a car. It's a bike and it weighs just 476 lb in full trim and a 90% full tank. That's a weight to power ratio of 1.6 lb/hp. I'm having a hard time wrapping my mind around that number. To put that number into perspective, a 2013 Mustang GT500 has 5.9 lb/hp. A C6 Corvette ZR1 has 5.3 lb/hp. A 2015 Porsche 918 has 4.2 lb/hp and that's with the electric motors running at full song. The insane Hennessey Venom GT with its twin-turbo LS7 7.0 litre engine has 2.2 lb/hp. I can't even begin to imagine what 1.6 lb/hp would feel like. I would also be curious about how fast you'd have to be going to be able to use that power. I used to have an 09 Cobalt SS. It had GM Stage 1 and a few bolt ons which would put it at very close to that 296 ...

2016 Mustang EcoBoost Track Review

Photography by: Graham MacNeil Ford really wants to sell you a Mustang with a turbo four cylinder. They started by derating the V6 engine in the 2015 S550 compared to the 2011-2014 S197 V6 to make the EcoBoost 2.3 litre more differentiated. Then, they offered a performance pack on the EcoBoost but not on the V6. Now, they killed the V6 all together for 2018 and will only sell you a V8 or this EcoBoost. I love a good V8, everyone who knows me knows that. This is a Mustang, which means it needs a V8. If those aren't enough reasons, I always prefer natural aspiration over forced induction. That's three strikes against the EcoBoost-powered Mustang. But I'd be lying if I said the idea never intrigued me. It's the lightest (if you account for features). It has the best weight distribution. It has the same great chassis as the GT. It's very affordable and it has a lot of potential to make more power. Aftermarket? Endless support. There's plenty of good about it....