Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

The Rams Eye Goes Racing!




That's right, as of last weekend, I am officially a rookie race car driver! I have always wanted to race and ever since I started going to our local track for HPDS, lapping days, or time attacks, I became even more serious about it. Last weekend, I took the Race School and was able to get my racing license. The race car? An IT (Improved Touring) 1995 VW GTI race car. The car was prepped and is maintained by the Vantage Motorsports race team and it's a blast to drive, but I'll get into that later. I have expressed interest several times before and last year I have all but committed to Derek Lugar, team owner and Chief Race Instructor for our region (Atlantic Canada). He agreed to let me use the car if I cover the costs and I was absolutely thrilled and proud that he let me use their car. Speaking of which..




The car's power is mostly stock to meet the SCCA IT-B classification rules. I have been told more than once that it makes "108-112 whp" which would put it right around the stock hp rating for the 16V 2.0L GTI. It's certainly nothing to brag about.. but that's where the "shame" stops. The car is incredibly well balanced. It does what you ask it to (unless that's accelerating too fast..). Understeer? No such thing. The car is tuned to oversteer. Turn in, and it's the back end that you have to watch for, not the front. Getting hard on the brakes while the car is less-than-straight will require counter steering. It sounded scary at first when I was getting "debriefed" but drive the car and the fear disappears. It's all progressive and predictable. The gas pedal easily balances the car if the rear end feels like it wants to overtake the front. The car begs to be driven fast. It has a great limited slip differential and, combined with little power, means you're flat out for a lot of the track, with no understeer under power, and there are no inside wheel spinning shenanigans. It's a momentum car so if you make a mistake, you lose a lot of time. The upside? It makes you a much, much better driver. And a braver one, because the brake pedal becomes your #1 enemy. Scrubbing off speed is easy. Building it, not so much.




There was no timing on the school day, Saturday, so we were just learning the cars, dealing with cars side-by-side on the track, passing in corners as opposed to only on the straights during lapping days and HPDS. But by the end of the day, I was starting to get comfortable and was getting very curious about lap times. I asked what the car can do and was told about 1:19-1:20's on the Hoosiers and 1:21-1:22 as equipped - Toyo Proxes RA1's, the rain tires. I thought I don't want to push too hard (since it's not my car) so I will set a goal for 1:25-1:26 and be happy with that. Sunday was race day. There were two qualifying sessions, two races by class, one "unlimited" race, and one 1-hour endurance challenge.

First qualifying session comes on Sunday and I line up to get ready, wait for my first hot lap... and it was a 1:30.x. Ouch. Another lap, 1:30.x. I run into some traffic and start running 1:32's-1:33's. Far off the mark. I'm now thinking that's a big mountain to climb and with so little power, all the time I have to find is even harder. My best lap for the session was 1:29.8.

After the session, I had a chat with the team members and asked for guidance. They were all too happy to help, one GIANT advantage I didn't foresee having when I decided to go in with this team (as opposed to on my own, since I couldn't afford to). Moreover, they said they'll help me through the helmet radio to find time. I strapped back in the car for qualifying session #2, and adjusted my expectations to 1:27 by the end of the day. Boy, was I in for a (very pleasant) surprise. I ran another 1:30.x hot lap before the radio starts to show its benefit. "That was a minute twenty eight!" I radio the team as I pass the start finish line and see the telemetry read out on the dash. "Good job Mike". Another lap goes by "minute twenty seven!!", I radio on the next lap. I'm at the goal already! But it doesn't stop there. 1:26 came the lap after. And 1:25 the lap after that. I started running consistent 1:25's, with a best of 1:25.7 - enough to qualify 2nd in a class of three so mid pack. With that said, the other two cars where a second generation Honda CRX and a first generation (Spec) Miata, both are faster cars and also happened to be on better (dry) tires.


 


Our class was GT6, the slowest, so I knew we would all be at the bottom of the grid and would only be racing each other. Unfortunately, as I was getting more familiar with my car, so were other the other racers in my class. I was running low 1:25's during the race and even had a best of 1:25.07. The other two were running just under 1:24's, though. I wasn't too aggressive in defending my position as I was still very much a rookie and the car isn't mine so I lost my position and became third in class but an incident resulted in me gaining a position (luckily, the guy and the car were fine and continued to race for the rest of the day). I finished middle of the class and second last over all, just as I started. For the second race, I started in the middle based on the qualifying. I stayed with them for the first 4-5 laps.

Unfortunately, the CRX had a driver swap and he was even quicker. The Miata's driver was getting also quicker as the race went on. They were running low 1:22's. I had found another second and was running 1:24's, but that's still two seconds off and by the second half of the race, they were two or three corners ahead of me. I was no longer in the race. I ended up coming second last again, but only due to a DNF for one of the higher classes. A little disappointing but not the complete story. The bright side was that I was getting quicker, with a best of the race (and the day) lap time of 1:24.19 and only two seconds off the pace of what the car is capable of. Moreover, Mr. Lugar drove the car for the last two races of the day and got best laps of 1:22.198 and 1:21.790. In other words, it takes his skill, one of the fastest drivers in the region, if not the fastest, to make up for the disadvantage vs. the other quicker cars in the class so I couldn't have reasonably expected to do any better. Can't complain!

It was a little bittersweet due to my finishing position but I had nonetheless absolutely and fully enjoyed the weekend! What a blast! I would like to give huge thanks to Vantage Motors. I wouldn't have been able to do this otherwise. Next race weekend is the last weekend of June. Stay tuned!


Comments

  1. Great read! I look forward to not spinning out next weekend and giving you a good run Mike. See you at the track
    Slower CRX Guy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haha thanks! To be completely fair, you very well could have been just as quick, considering I did improve by about 1 second in the second race.

      Looking forward to the race tomorrow too, best of luck!

      Delete

Post a Comment







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

GTR vs Evo X vs STI: which has the best AWD system?

A few weeks ago, I made a post explaining  mainstream AWD system types and how they compare , pros and cons, etc. including some simple diagrams to show where the power goes and how much. As promised, this post will focus on specific cars and what AWD systems they use, especially ones that that have more or less been defined by their AWD systems, and the best place to start may be with a bombshell; the Nissan GT-R. Nissan GT-R (R35) The GT-R has built a reputation around having monster traction and very approachable performance, thanks to its AWD system - Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain (ATTESA) - and what it can do for you. But the GT-R doesn't actually use the most mechanically sophisticated type of AWD systems discussed in the previous article, namely a "true" AWD with a centre differential. Instead, it uses a clutch pack to transfer power. RWD-based clutch-type AWD schematic - Rams Eye The Track Guy © The R32, R33, and R34 Sky

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would

All Mainstream AWD and 4WD Systems Compared and Explained

Mitsubishi Evo X GSR at Atlantic Motorsport Park - Kevin Doubleday  © If you live in Canada or the US, you'll find that plenty of people hold sacred the terms '4x4' and '4WD' to describe a 'true 4x4', where you have a butch transfer case with a low speed, perhaps a body on frame chassis, and ideally a solid axle or two. I'm not sure how that translates to the rest of the world. My extensive research into the motoring industry in Europe (which exclusively consists of watching Top Gear and The Grand Tour...) concluded that most people across the pond simply refer to any vehicle that is capable of sending any power to all four wheels as a 4WD vehicle, further muddying the waters. Where I grew up, 4x4 was more or less synonymous with 'Jeep' so that's not much help either. However, despite all various systems attempting to do the same sort of thing - distribute power between all four wheels instead of two - not all systems are created equal,

How would a Mustang 3.5L EcoBoost compare to the 5.0L V8?

Ever wonder how a 3.5 litre EcoBoost might fair against the 5.0 litre V8 in the Mustang? Of course you have. Ever since Ford dropped it in the F150 (and perhaps well before), everyone has been wondering how it would perform. There are basically two camps; those who think it would be awesome because of tuneability and power potential and those who think it means the death of the V8 in the Mustang. If you are in the latter group, we seem to be good so far with continuous upgrades to the 5.0 litre Coyote and the brand new Shelby GT500 which still uses a supercharged V8 as it has been for over a decade and multiple iterations. But what if... Well, it seems we are closer than ever to finding out the answer to that question. American Trucks recently got together two crew cab, short box, 4x4 F150's but one has the 5.0 litre V8 and the other has the 3.5 litre EcoBoost V6. There has been a few comparisons between 5.0 litre and 3.5 litre EB F150's, but this seems to be the most di