Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

2020 Porsche 992 (911) Details


Unlike the new 2019 3-series that was officially revealed by BMW, the anticipated 2020 Porsche 992 (911) has not been officially revealed yet. But that doesn't mean a lot about it isn't known already. In a recent prototype drive by Car and Driver, Porsche discussed a lot of the changes. This update is very important in my opinion because the next 911 may have its work cut out for it judging by what we know about the upcoming mid-engine Corvette. The 911 vs Corvette rivalry is nothing new, spanning decades. While there has been very significant and revolutionary changes to the 911 - including switching from air-cooled to water-cooled engines, losing hydraulic power steering, and recently an all turbocharged lineup (short of the GT3) - none have been as revolutionary as the Corvette's planned change to switch from front engine to mid engine layout. So what is the next 911 coming going to be armed with? There are a bunch of changes, although most are just incremental but one stands out as being beyond that to me.

The most fundamental change, in my opinion, is covered up. A new engine mounting system brings engine mounts forward relative to previous 911's. The engine of 911's used to mount to a cross beam (red arrows above) at the back/end of the engine. The cross beam mounted to two engine mounts (yellow arrows) that are bolted to the rear of the car and, in turn, support the beam. A BR Racing 997.2 Cup Car is shown but the basic design for all previous 911's is the same. The front of the engine is supported to the rear subframe (blue arrows, missing the centre section).

There is no mention of what - if anything - is changing about the front engine support (i.e. the rear subframe) so, presumably, that will stay the same. But the big change is to the rear support. The new 911 will move the rear mounts forward to the engine's cylinder heads (green "rectangles"). The new design also has more closely spaced mounts instead of the far outboard locations as shown, making the mounting system overall structurally stiffer and lighter. I think that - in addition to the new mounting design being stiffer and lighter - it is also meant to virtually shift the weight balance of the car closer to that of a mid engine layout without having to move the engine itself (or perhaps move it slightly but maintain rear placement behind the axle). By moving forward where the engine mounts to the chassis, the weight of the engine is effectively moved forward in the chassis as well and is closer to the main rear structure of the car, no coincidence I suspect.


There are a bunch of other changes to improve handling as well. All 992's will switch to the beautiful wide haunches of the Carrera 4 and GTS. That means 2" wider rear fenders housing a 1.5" wider rear track going from 59.8" to 61.3" for all Carrera models. The fronts will also see track widened by 1.6", although this will apply across the board since all 991.2 Carrera models (i.e. base, 4, and GTS) currently have the same front track width of 60.7" (you can read about how this helps handling here). The wider rear fenders will be stamped in aluminum now to match most of the body. That will save 22-33 lb. I suspect the 22 lb. saving is on the base Carrera models that now have narrower track and fenders, with the larger fenders negating some of the savings of going to aluminum. The 33 lb. saving is likely on the Carrera 4 and GTS models that already had wider fenders.

Length will grow by approximately one inch thanks to a longer front overhang, likely for pedestrian crash testing. Wheelbase is unchanged, though, and so is most of the suspension and basic chassis design. The wheel widths will carry over from the current ones, meaning 8.5" front and 11.5" rear wheels. Diameters, though, will change. On the base Carrera, diameter will drop in the front to 19" but the rears will stay put at 20". The S models do the opposite, where the fronts stay at 20" but the rears grow to 21". There are a couple of significant firsts here. This is the first time a non-GT RS series 911 (i.e. GT3 RS, GT2 RS) have used a wheel diameter larger than 20" or staggered front and rear wheel diameters.


If you think larger diameter wheels are counter productive to performance, you are not alone. But the larger rear tires help increase the contact patch, according to August Achleitner, Porsche's VP of sports cars. This feeds a lot of fuel to the fire I posted a couple of years about the same topic of wheel diameter vs performance, more on that here. "In a rear-heavy car like the 911, anything you do to increase rear grip helps the handling significantly," said August.

The sizes of brake rotors and calipers are carried over from the 991.2, but Porsche will introduce its relatively new brake coating tech called Porsche Surface Coated Brakes or PSCB for short as an option. It includes coating the brake swept area with a very hard tungsten-carbide layer. The same tech was recently offered on the Cayenne, where Porsche claims that PSCB reduces brake dust by a whopping 90% and increases rotor life by up to 30% while also improving braking performance. Hard to argue with that. The calipers will be unchanged, but will be painted white to differentiate them (so that you can brag to all your friends about the better brakes if you buy one).


And of course, you can't introduce a new generation of any sports car without more power. Although there are no revolutionary changes such as the switch to an all turbocharged Carrera lineup from the 991 to the 991.2, there are a bunch of evolutionary changes. There is a larger central intercooler, for instance, instead of two small ones in the rear fenders. It is now 12% larger and receives cooling air directly from below the wing, all in the name of reducing intake temps. If you're wondering what those vents are still doing that are low in the bumper at either end behind the wheels, that's where the cooling air exits after passing through the intercooler to cool the intake charge. The Exhaust flow is also improved via cast manifolds instead of the stamped steel units used on the 991.2, which are said to flow better and weigh no more.

Porsche also switched to piezoelectric fuel injectors instead of the current mechanical ones. In short, piezoelectric materials are materials that can generate electricity if you apply force/pressure to them. The opposite is also true, where those materials can apply force/pressure (by expanding) if you apply electricity to them. Piezoelectric injectors are injectors that use materials with piezoelectric properties to control opening and closing injector nozzle. The benefit in performance is much quicker actuation time than traditional mechanical or electromechanical injectors and more precise control. They also provide a wider range of controlling fuel delivery instead of just injector cycle since the amount of force (and therefore expansion) depends on how much electricity you can apply so you could control how much you open the nozzle in addition to how long.

In addition to the individual benefits of each change, all these changes allowed an increase in compression ratio from 10.0:1 to 10.5:1, improving both power and efficiency. The result for the base Carrera is an increase of 15 hp from 370 hp to 385, despite a drop in peak boost pressure from 13.1 psi in the 991.2 (Porsche doesn't say how much). The Carrera S gets a larger turbine wheel on top of all the changes. It previously used the same turbo as the base Carrera with 49 mm and 45 mm compressor and turbine wheels but will now get the larger 55 mm and 48 mm compressor and turbine wheels used in the GTS. The result is another 30 hp from 420 to 450 hp for the Carrera S, matching matching today's GTS although at "only" 16.0 psi (same as the current Carrera S) instead of the 18.1 psi the current GTS has to squeeze out of its turbos. The output of the GTS isn't specified, but I'm sure it will gain another 30-50 hp to keep its place in the hierarchy of the 911 lineup.

Thankfully, and bucking the trend of most cars dropping manuals, you'll still be able to order your Carrera with the same seven-speed manual. Of course, a PDK option will also be available, although that will go from a 7-speed to an 8-speed unit. The change was apparently not to improve mileage or performance. Instead, the 8-speed unit (known as PDK 2) uses a four-shaft design rather than the current two-shaft design of the PDK (known as PDK 1 found in 991 and 997 (going back to 2004). It is shorter and allows for enough room for an electric motor that will eventually find its way in some 992 hybrid variant. The gear ratio spread is unchanged, with the extra gear being a new ratio between the current 6th and 7th gear ratios.

All the mechanical changes sound great, although there are a couple of annoyances. First is a new driving mode for driving in wet conditions which will be standard across the board. It is detected by a sensor in the front wheel well and can determine if the road is wet and the depth of water. If wet is detected, it switches to a more sensitive stability control setting. This is automatic. There is an actual "Wet" driving mode that a driver can select, which will make stability control even more intrusive. It sounds good at first, but my biggest fear is if the "1st stage" of wet driving mode cannot be defeated and you have to either turn stability control off altogether or accept it.


The other annoyance is at the back of the car. The exhaust tips are fake... sort of. It's nearly as bad as recent VW products (Golf, Jetta, Tiguan, and Touareg) where there are chrome rectangular bezels molded in the bumper that look like exhaust tips but they are blocked and the actual exhaust outlet from the muffler is downturned behind the bumper. In the 992, the exhaust tips are openings attached to the bumper and the actual exhaust outlets from the muffler are behind them. Certainly a smaller crime, but - being a 911 - it's the equivalent of a crime committed by an officer of the law, something a sports car court would not take lightly.

Nevertheless, there are a lot of exciting changes. Nothing to suggest the car is getting more numb, lazy, heavier, or larger. The lineup has already gone turbo and manual isn't dead. All that is there is better handling, more grip, some weight saving, and more power. What's there to complain about? I'm really curious to find out how (or if) the change in engine mounting system affects driving and the constant awareness in a 911 that the engine is sitting all the way in the back. The car will go on sale summer 2019, so we don't have to wait that much longer to find out.

Source: Car & Driver

Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!





Comments







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

GTR vs Evo X vs STI: which has the best AWD system?

A few weeks ago, I made a post explaining  mainstream AWD system types and how they compare , pros and cons, etc. including some simple diagrams to show where the power goes and how much. As promised, this post will focus on specific cars and what AWD systems they use, especially ones that that have more or less been defined by their AWD systems, and the best place to start may be with a bombshell; the Nissan GT-R. Nissan GT-R (R35) The GT-R has built a reputation around having monster traction and very approachable performance, thanks to its AWD system - Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain (ATTESA) - and what it can do for you. But the GT-R doesn't actually use the most mechanically sophisticated type of AWD systems discussed in the previous article, namely a "true" AWD with a centre differential. Instead, it uses a clutch pack to transfer power. RWD-based clutch-type AWD schematic - Rams Eye The Track Guy © The R32, R33, and R34 Sky

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track load

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would

Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R Track Review

2012 Boss 302 on square 305/30/19 RE-71R's at AMP - Graham MacNeil © For better or for worse, I have heard and read so much about RE-71R's. Everyone swears by the grip but complains about the wear. Generally speaking, the pros are: 1. They grip as well or better than most R comps. 2. They don't wear as quickly as R comps if driven occasionally on the street. 3. They work better in the rain than R comps. The cons were limited to overheating quickly when used on track (being an autocross tire) and wearing too fast on heavy cars like mine. In the popular 200 TW category, they are faster than the popular Hankook RS-4's and BFGoodrich Rival S's according to published Tire Rack Tests. According to plenty of reviews, they are also faster than well established R comps like R888R's (which don't seem to work too well on heavy cars anyway) and the venerable NT01's. But I was still hesitant for a while until I talked to a tire tech support gentleman