Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

The Rams Eye is going Rallycross

Image
By
Focus RS at Conrad Bros Ltd. for the Jan 2018 BAC Rallycross - Kevin Doubleday ©

It’s official: The Ram’s Eye is going rallycross this season!  I've been wanting to go rallycross ever since I learned about local events just a couple of years after I started high performance driving. Unfortunately, buying a car to go rallycross just wasn't in the books so I had been waiting and watching from the sidelines. But the moment has come and a fix for track withdrawals during the off-season is finally in order. No, it won't be a Focus RS (unfortunately). It's not even an AWD car. My budget was very limited. Without a truck and a trailer, the car also had to be road worthy (or could cheaply be made road legal). No AWD car fit road worthiness criteria and the budget so it didn't happen.

But there were other must-have criteria aside from road worthiness. The car had to be a manual (of course) and it had to either have a limited slip diff from the factory or tried-and-true aftermarket options. After a few weeks of searching, looking around, and talking to people, I finally found the one (almost sounds romantic, doesn't it?). It's a 2007 VW Rabbit/Golf, 2 door or 3 door hatch as a lot of people call them. It has the 2.5 litre 5 cylinder engine, one of my favourite VW engines by far. It has basically no options aside from alloy wheels, which is great; less to go wrong and less weight. Car and Driver tested 2008 2 door model (170 hp vs 150 hp like mine...) like this, but it was automatic and it had a couple of options. That one weight 2,940 lb. I figure this one is probably in the low 2,900 lb. range and I'd like to think it may even be very high in the 2,8xx lb. range.


I'm going to run the car completely stock for a few events to benchmark it but do of course have a few mods planned. Aside from tires and brakes, I'm planning to do some weight-saving mods for starters. I heard that aluminum control arms and knuckles from a Passat save some weight. I'm sure the rear seats and perhaps passenger seat might find themselves tucked in my garage somewhere and I'll probably end up getting a nice bucket driver seat. I'm also planning to get an exhaust, because how could you have a 5 cylinder car without uncorking it a bit? I'm hoping that between all the above fairly simple weight saving mods, I'm going to get the car down in the low 2,800 lb. range, maybe even crack into the 2,7xx lb. range if I'm lucky.

Other mods that are bound to end up on the car are a limited slip diff like I mentioned, camber plates, anti-roll bars, but will likely keep the stock springs and dampers stock for a while. I'm also hoping to do something about the power but that will be down the road after the more crucial stuff. I'd like to save the limited slip diff until after track season starts in May because that would a nice comparison to do on track before/after the diff. Oh, yes, I'm sure this car will end up on track. The car is classed very low under our Time Attack classification rules (which follow the Ontario car classification rules) so I think it will be a competitive Time Attack car after being adjusted for class.


But I'm getting ahead of myself here. First rallycross for me, this car, and this season is tomorrow! I can't wait. Make sure to follow for updates on the car and results from the first day!

 Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!



Labels:

Comments

  1. Unknown13 December 2018 at 18:30

    I ask drivers all the time at track - "have you tried Rallycross?" I feel anyone that drives on track, and wants an advantage over other drivers, especially in foul conditions should try Rallycross for a season. The skills learned running in loose traction conditions at speed transfer to the track perfectly, and they are skills that can't be mastered any other way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Michael R.18 December 2018 at 13:03

      I couldn't agree more! I wish I had managed to start earlier. I can already tell how much better I will be for it.

      Delete

Post a Comment






Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.





Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.



🔥 Most Visited This Week

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

By
I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track load...
6 comments
Read more

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

By
A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity. Grip is noticeably l...
12 comments
Read more

2016 Mustang EcoBoost Track Review

By
Photography by: Graham MacNeil Ford really wants to sell you a Mustang with a turbo four cylinder. They started by derating the V6 engine in the 2015 S550 compared to the 2011-2014 S197 V6 to make the EcoBoost 2.3 litre more differentiated. Then, they offered a performance pack on the EcoBoost but not on the V6. Now, they killed the V6 all together for 2018 and will only sell you a V8 or this EcoBoost. I love a good V8, everyone who knows me knows that. This is a Mustang, which means it needs a V8. If those aren't enough reasons, I always prefer natural aspiration over forced induction. That's three strikes against the EcoBoost-powered Mustang. But I'd be lying if I said the idea never intrigued me. It's the lightest (if you account for features). It has the best weight distribution. It has the same great chassis as the GT. It's very affordable and it has a lot of potential to make more power. Aftermarket? Endless support. There's plenty of good about it....
6 comments
Read more

Kawasaki Ninja H2R - 300 hp and Supercharged

By
Okay, this isn't a car but there's a reason why I'm writing about it. It has a supercharged 1.0 litre engine makes 296 hp. 296 hp may not be too impressive in a car but one has to remember that this isn't a car. It's a bike and it weighs just 476 lb in full trim and a 90% full tank. That's a weight to power ratio of 1.6 lb/hp. I'm having a hard time wrapping my mind around that number. To put that number into perspective, a 2013 Mustang GT500 has 5.9 lb/hp. A C6 Corvette ZR1 has 5.3 lb/hp. A 2015 Porsche 918 has 4.2 lb/hp and that's with the electric motors running at full song. The insane Hennessey Venom GT with its twin-turbo LS7 7.0 litre engine has 2.2 lb/hp. I can't even begin to imagine what 1.6 lb/hp would feel like. I would also be curious about how fast you'd have to be going to be able to use that power. I used to have an 09 Cobalt SS. It had GM Stage 1 and a few bolt ons which would put it at very close to that 296 ...
Post a Comment
Read more