Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

2020 BMW M3 Pure to be manual, RWD


A couple of months ago, I posted about how the 2020 BMW M3 (code named G80) will bring more than 500 hp and AWD. At that point, I figured all hope was lost for a manual M3 or M4, despite an earlier report that BMW M is still committed to manuals. Thankfully, it looks like hope is fully restored or - better yet - replaced with full expectations of a manual, thanks to an interview by Car Magazine.

If you were waiting for a 500+ hp AWD beast, fear not. It is still coming. But BMW M boss Markus Flasch just confirmed to Car Magazine that an entry level version for the purists will bring lower horsepower, a manual stick shift, and RWD. They are code named M3 Pure or M4 Pure internally and will pack "only" 454 hp. According to Car Magazine, this is because BMW does not have a manual gear box that can handle the full output, but I'm sure it also has something to do with hierarchy. It will still come with an electronic limited slip differential like the current M cars.

The standard model will pack 473 hp and a full fat, Competition model will also be available later to go head to head with the AMG C63 S and will pack 503 hp to match the AMG. Both the standard and Competition models will come standard with an 8-speed automatic and no option of a manual. It looks like the dual clutch transmission in the current F80 M3 and F82 M4 won't make a return.


Both models will also do away with RWD. Markus said in the interview that BMW was able to put the same AWD system from the F90 M5 into the new M3. The 'Pure' models will come only as RWD and won't have the option of AWD. However, since BMW is using the same AWD system from the M5, that means that the AWD models will have a selectable RWD-mode that allows you to disconnect the front axle and send all the power to the rear axle alone. 

Said power will come from the new S58 3.0 litre twin-turbocharged straight six engine that BMW already puts in the brand new X3 M and X4 M. BMW says it is its most advanced straight six produced to date and will utilize a water injection system to cool "high combustion temperatures". It's not clear if it's an intercooler spray temperature like in the 911 (991.2) GT2 RS or a methanol mixture injection system to directly cool the charge air. Either way, it should result in more reliable horsepower on track regardless of heat, but you'll have to keep the tank filled. By the sound of things the 'Pure' and standard models will utilize more or less the same engine with different states of tune, but the Competition models will also get a higher compression ratio and unique intake manifold and exhaust.

The new M3 and M4 will be revealed in September at the 2019 Frankfurt Motor Show and, although prices are yet to be revealed, the standard model and Competition models should be expected to come in at a premium to the current models, if for nothing but the AWD system. The back-to-basics pure models, though... it may not be totally unreasonable to expect them to cost about the same or only slightly higher. Thankfully, we won't have to wait too long to find out.


Follow Rams Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!





Comments

  1. This is fuckin great news. In a world where people look at a stick shift gearbox and ask in awe "Stick shift? OH what is that??" this is a 200 iq move by BMW no joke. I have driven manual boxes forever and can't get used to automatics no matter what. The fact that im also a racing driver doesn't help - I like to shift when I want, where I want and how I want.

    I've driven many cars with DCT gearboxes in semi-auto mode, and, while similar in terms of feel. are still no where compared to a true manual. Let's hope more manufacturers bring it back. Im looking at you Audi, Lamborghini, Ferrari, Mercedes, Ford, etc. Let's stop dumbing down stuff for once.

    ReplyDelete

Post a comment







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's

If you've had any doubts about whether or not they will fit, fear not! You absolutely can run square 305/30/19's. I had a lot of doubts before pulling the trigger, even more so when the wheels where on the car. The tires do poke out a bit and I figured rubbing is all but guaranteed at full compression but I couldn't be happier I trusted APEX and those on here who have run it. Here's what you need: 1. Camber plates: I have MM C/C plates and they are maxed out at -2.3 deg with the stock struts. I have been running them for years with many track days without issue. 2. 1"/25 mm spacer: I have Motorsport-tech 1" spacers and they look like high quality units. There is maybe a 1/4 inch clearance in the back so you can't go any narrower than 25 mm. http://www.motorsport-tech.com/adaptec/car/ford_s and you want Design 2. Motorsport Tech 1" Mustang Hub-centric Spacers 3. Elongated studs: your best bet is to get the FPP hubs with elongated studs

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track load

All Mainstream AWD and 4WD Systems Compared and Explained

Mitsubishi Evo X GSR at Atlantic Motorsport Park - Kevin Doubleday  © If you live in Canada or the US, you'll find that plenty of people hold sacred the terms '4x4' and '4WD' to describe a 'true 4x4', where you have a butch transfer case with a low speed, perhaps a body on frame chassis, and ideally a solid axle or two. I'm not sure how that translates to the rest of the world. My extensive research into the motoring industry in Europe (which exclusively consists of watching Top Gear and The Grand Tour...) concluded that most people across the pond simply refer to any vehicle that is capable of sending any power to all four wheels as a 4WD vehicle, further muddying the waters. Where I grew up, 4x4 was more or less synonymous with 'Jeep' so that's not much help either. However, despite all various systems attempting to do the same sort of thing - distribute power between all four wheels instead of two - not all systems are created equal,

Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R Track Review

2012 Boss 302 on square 305/30/19 RE-71R's at AMP - Graham MacNeil © For better or for worse, I have heard and read so much about RE-71R's. Everyone swears by the grip but complains about the wear. Generally speaking, the pros are: 1. They grip as well or better than most R comps. 2. They don't wear as quickly as R comps if driven occasionally on the street. 3. They work better in the rain than R comps. The cons were limited to overheating quickly when used on track (being an autocross tire) and wearing too fast on heavy cars like mine. In the popular 200 TW category, they are faster than the popular Hankook RS-4's and BFGoodrich Rival S's according to published Tire Rack Tests. According to plenty of reviews, they are also faster than well established R comps like R888R's (which don't seem to work too well on heavy cars anyway) and the venerable NT01's. But I was still hesitant for a while until I talked to a tire tech support gentleman