Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

2020 BMW M3 Pure to be manual, RWD


A couple of months ago, I posted about how the 2020 BMW M3 (code named G80) will bring more than 500 hp and AWD. At that point, I figured all hope was lost for a manual M3 or M4, despite an earlier report that BMW M is still committed to manuals. Thankfully, it looks like hope is fully restored or - better yet - replaced with full expectations of a manual, thanks to an interview by Car Magazine.

If you were waiting for a 500+ hp AWD beast, fear not. It is still coming. But BMW M boss Markus Flasch just confirmed to Car Magazine that an entry level version for the purists will bring lower horsepower, a manual stick shift, and RWD. They are code named M3 Pure or M4 Pure internally and will pack "only" 454 hp. According to Car Magazine, this is because BMW does not have a manual gear box that can handle the full output, but I'm sure it also has something to do with hierarchy. It will still come with an electronic limited slip differential like the current M cars.

The standard model will pack 473 hp and a full fat, Competition model will also be available later to go head to head with the AMG C63 S and will pack 503 hp to match the AMG. Both the standard and Competition models will come standard with an 8-speed automatic and no option of a manual. It looks like the dual clutch transmission in the current F80 M3 and F82 M4 won't make a return.


Both models will also do away with RWD. Markus said in the interview that BMW was able to put the same AWD system from the F90 M5 into the new M3. The 'Pure' models will come only as RWD and won't have the option of AWD. However, since BMW is using the same AWD system from the M5, that means that the AWD models will have a selectable RWD-mode that allows you to disconnect the front axle and send all the power to the rear axle alone. 

Said power will come from the new S58 3.0 litre twin-turbocharged straight six engine that BMW already puts in the brand new X3 M and X4 M. BMW says it is its most advanced straight six produced to date and will utilize a water injection system to cool "high combustion temperatures". It's not clear if it's an intercooler spray temperature like in the 911 (991.2) GT2 RS or a methanol mixture injection system to directly cool the charge air. Either way, it should result in more reliable horsepower on track regardless of heat, but you'll have to keep the tank filled. By the sound of things the 'Pure' and standard models will utilize more or less the same engine with different states of tune, but the Competition models will also get a higher compression ratio and unique intake manifold and exhaust.

The new M3 and M4 will be revealed in September at the 2019 Frankfurt Motor Show and, although prices are yet to be revealed, the standard model and Competition models should be expected to come in at a premium to the current models, if for nothing but the AWD system. The back-to-basics pure models, though... it may not be totally unreasonable to expect them to cost about the same or only slightly higher. Thankfully, we won't have to wait too long to find out.


Follow Rams Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!





Comments

  1. This is fuckin great news. In a world where people look at a stick shift gearbox and ask in awe "Stick shift? OH what is that??" this is a 200 iq move by BMW no joke. I have driven manual boxes forever and can't get used to automatics no matter what. The fact that im also a racing driver doesn't help - I like to shift when I want, where I want and how I want.

    I've driven many cars with DCT gearboxes in semi-auto mode, and, while similar in terms of feel. are still no where compared to a true manual. Let's hope more manufacturers bring it back. Im looking at you Audi, Lamborghini, Ferrari, Mercedes, Ford, etc. Let's stop dumbing down stuff for once.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

GTR vs Evo X vs STI: which has the best AWD system?

A few weeks ago, I made a post explaining  mainstream AWD system types and how they compare , pros and cons, etc. including some simple diagrams to show where the power goes and how much. As promised, this post will focus on specific cars and what AWD systems they use, especially ones that that have more or less been defined by their AWD systems, and the best place to start may be with a bombshell; the Nissan GT-R. Nissan GT-R (R35) The GT-R has built a reputation around having monster traction and very approachable performance, thanks to its AWD system - Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain (ATTESA) - and what it can do for you. But the GT-R doesn't actually use the most mechanically sophisticated type of AWD systems discussed in the previous article, namely a "true" AWD with a centre differential. Instead, it uses a clutch pack to transfer power. RWD-based clutch-type AWD schematic - Rams Eye The Track Guy © The R32, R33, and R34 Sky

Falken Azenis RT615k+ Street and Track Review

Last year, I picked up a 2009 Lancer Ralliart to do a long term test with it as a dual duty track/daily. One of the first things I knew I was going to do was put a decent set of tires on it. The car came without OEM wheels which was actually good because I didn't have to hesitate about getting a good set of aftermarket wheels to support going wider. Thankfully, my friends at YST Auto Halifax  set me up with a great set of Superspeed RF03RR wheels. The Wheels I had never even heard of Superspeed but I trusted the good folk at YST Auto who mentioned some customer cars running on track with them. These wheels are rotary forged which is basically a prerequisite to be taken seriously in this market populated by companies like TSW and Fast Wheels. The wheels looked like a high quality, well finished wheel and each had a "QC" check sticker on. Just for appearances? Maybe, but I found no defects. The wheels seemed easy to balance (didn't need many weights) and at 18.1 lb. f

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track load

2004 Audi TT 3.2 Quattro DSG Track Review

Before getting into this, I have to confess something... I had never driven an Audi TT before. Not until this one, anyway. But that hasn't stopped me from forming an opinion about it from the comforts of my own couch while reading and watching reviews online. After all, if you've never done that, do you even know what the point of the internet is? Now, we all interpret reviews differently. Call it confirmation bias if you will, but if you like a car, you'll read a review and look at the positives as what makes the car great and the negatives are but a few quibbles you have to live with. If you don't like a car, the positives are a few things the manufacturer got right while screwing up everything else. It's a bit harsh to put the TT in the latter category, but that's where it ended up for me... I never took the TT seriously. The problem with the TT for me isn't that it's a Golf underneath, per se. There is nothing wrong with a performance car sharing a