Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

2016 Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0T AWD - A Closer Look




The biggest news I found in this test is a huge improvement in power output. Looking back at one of the very early tests of the +Cadillac  ATS with this engine done by Car & Driver was a comparison test back in 2012, the ATS 2.0T was noticeably lacking in power compared to the 328i. Although the older tested cars were very different (i.e. lighter, manual equipped RWD versions) than this Cadillac, Car & Driver recently also tested a 2016 BMW 328i xDrive so we can have an apples-to-apples comparison of this AWD, 4-cyl turbo ATS and an AWD, 4-cyl turbo 328i. In the early test, the numbers were:


2013 Cadillac ATS 2.0T 2012 BMW 328i
0-30 mph 2.0 s 2.0 s
0-60 mph 6.3 s 5.6 s
0-100 mph 16.7 s 14.5 s
0-130 mph 34.7 s 26.4 s
1/4 mile 14.8 s @ 94 mph 14.3 s @ 99 mph
5-60 mph (street start) 7.4 s 6.6 s


At the time, the car made 272 hp @ 5,500 rpm and 260 lb-ft @ 1,700. Meanwhile, the 328i is rated at 240 hp @ 5,000 and 255 lb-ft @ 1,250 rpm. The BMW is largely unchanged with hp rating staying the same as well as rpms at which peak hp and torque, while the torque number inches up a few points to 258 lb-ft. The ATS, on the other hand, saw its torque output increase by 35 lb-ft from 260 to 295 lb-ft but the peak occurs 1,300 rpm later so the engine is now rated to make 272 hp @ 5,500 and 295 lb-ft @ 3,000. At first, it seems like the power moved later in the curve due to the late torque peak but I suspect that the updated engine makes well over the previous 260 lb-ft rating at the lower rpms and simply makes more as rpms climb.

The result? Nothing short of impressive. Before, the Cadillac trailed the BMW by almost 1 second (0.7 s) to 60, over two seconds (2.2 s) to 100 mph, and a whopping 8.3 seconds to 130 mph. Now, the Cadillac loses by only one tenth to the BMW to 60 mph but beats it to 100 mph by 0.3 s and to 130 mph by almost 1 second (0.8 s).


2016 Cadillac ATS4 2.0T (AWD) 2016 BMW 328i XDrive (AWD)
0-60 mph 5.4 s 5.3 s
0-100 mph 14.5 s 14.8 s
0-130 mph 28.2 s 29.0 s
1/4 mile 14.1 s @ 99 mph 14.0 s @ 97 mph
5-60 mph (street start) 6.3 s 6.4 s


Unfortunately, it’s hard to figure out exactly how close the two would be if tested in the same place and on the same day, beyond “bench racing” those (albeit, weather corrected) test numbers. With that said, the ATS 2.0T was always noticeably slower than the 328i in acceleration tests, regardless of testing outlet or weather. In other words, if these numbers show it to be that much closer, it’s probably pretty darn close.

What I found even more impressive, though, is the fact that the ATS tied the 328i in lateral grip, both posting 0.86 g, and was able to out-break it from 70 mph by 7 ft (167 ft vs 174 ft for the 328i), all while rolling on Grand Touring All-Season Michelin Primacy MXM4 ZP tires while the 328i had Max Performance Summer Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR tires.

Now, the Caddy isn’t without its shortcomings. It’s noticeably smaller in the back and has a smaller trunk. I think Cadillac actually hit the nail on the head with sizing, but that’s because my all-time favourite small RWD sedan of all time is the E46 BMW 3-series and the ATS is very close in size to it, except in length that is exaggerated by the styling. In fact, the ATS is closer in wheelbase to the E46 3-series while the new F10 3-series is closer to the E39 5-series. Unfortunately for Cadillac, most people are looking for bigger cars now, as evident in the SUV and crossover surge in sales, so perhaps BMW’s move to a larger 3-series is more of what the market wants.

Its other problem right now, and perhaps the biggest, is the badge, or lack thereof of a desirable one. Now, I know a lot of people would say that deciding against buying a car because of a badge is badge snobbery and that may be true as far as decision making but the fault ultimately falls on the manufacturer. The value of a badge isn’t built out of thin air and “badge snobs” buy the badge that has a good image. It’s built on years of offering an appealing product. The BMW badge has been found on great sports cars for years. Cadillac is still trying to establish itself in the segment.

With that said, I think that Cadillac has clearly demonstrated it can build a better sports car than BMW, and that’s not just my opinion. Most auto journalists place the ATS near or at the top of the class in terms of driving joy and the same stands true of the CTS. The CT6 hasn’t had a comprehensive review yet but it seems to also be focusing on the “sport” part of sport sedan, without compromising ride or comfort. Will that pay off, despite a small disadvantage in size compared to the competition? Only time will tell, but I think Cadillac is on the right path.

Comments







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

Rams Eye New Track Car & Daily Reveal

New track car? You bet! Just picked it up a few weeks ago for a long term test to serve as a dual purpose daily and track car. It's a bit obscure and forgotten about but packs a lot of special features and one of the best AWD systems you can buy. Watch to find out what it is, why it's forgotten, and what I like the most about it (plus how much I paid for it!). Liked this? Make sure to subscribe so you don't miss new videos! Follow Rams Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram! View this post on Instagram A post shared by Michael R (@ramseyethetrackguy) on Sep 8, 2020 at 4:43pm PDT

GTR vs Evo X vs STI: which has the best AWD system?

A few weeks ago, I made a post explaining  mainstream AWD system types and how they compare , pros and cons, etc. including some simple diagrams to show where the power goes and how much. As promised, this post will focus on specific cars and what AWD systems they use, especially ones that that have more or less been defined by their AWD systems, and the best place to start may be with a bombshell; the Nissan GT-R. Nissan GT-R (R35) The GT-R has built a reputation around having monster traction and very approachable performance, thanks to its AWD system - Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain (ATTESA) - and what it can do for you. But the GT-R doesn't actually use the most mechanically sophisticated type of AWD systems discussed in the previous article, namely a "true" AWD with a centre differential. Instead, it uses a clutch pack to transfer power. RWD-based clutch-type AWD schematic - Rams Eye The Track Guy © The R32, R33, and R34 Sky

How would a Mustang 3.5L EcoBoost compare to the 5.0L V8?

Ever wonder how a 3.5 litre EcoBoost might fair against the 5.0 litre V8 in the Mustang? Of course you have. Ever since Ford dropped it in the F150 (and perhaps well before), everyone has been wondering how it would perform. There are basically two camps; those who think it would be awesome because of tuneability and power potential and those who think it means the death of the V8 in the Mustang. If you are in the latter group, we seem to be good so far with continuous upgrades to the 5.0 litre Coyote and the brand new Shelby GT500 which still uses a supercharged V8 as it has been for over a decade and multiple iterations. But what if... Well, it seems we are closer than ever to finding out the answer to that question. American Trucks recently got together two crew cab, short box, 4x4 F150's but one has the 5.0 litre V8 and the other has the 3.5 litre EcoBoost V6. There has been a few comparisons between 5.0 litre and 3.5 litre EB F150's, but this seems to be the most di

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would