Skip to main content

Is The Ford GT a Worthy Successor to The GT40?

The original Ford GT40 needs no introduction. It achieved instant race car celebrity status in 1966 when it did what was thought to be impossible; give a humble American car manufacturer like Ford the opportunity to beat the elite Ferrari at Le Mans. Most people know the highlight of the back story too. To spare you all the details, Ford was moving forward towards a deal to buy out Ferrari. Ferrari was interested, but Enzo Ferrari wanted to run their open wheel division themselves with full liberty. Ford didn't agree and Enzo pulled out of the deal.

Angered by that, Henry Ford (junior) wanted to show Ferrari that Ford could beat them at their own game so they went out to build a race car to win at Le Mans. What isn't very well known, however, is the fact that Ford struggled at first. Ford (naturally) went to established European manufacturers that had experience racing, likely expecting that the American racing builders would know nothing about winning at Le Mans. Unfortunately, it didn't work too well at first. It ran into teething issues in its first year in 1964 and didn't win anything the whole year with multiple DNF's (Did Not Finish).

Ford then went to a familiar name; a then-young Carroll Shelby. It dropped off the race cars and basically asked him to make them work. The Shelby magic manifested itself in 1965 and Ford won with Shelby's help at Daytona, then called Daytona 2000 which was run as a 2,000 km endurance race instead of 24 hours (interestingly, Ferrari was a 2-time Daytona Champion at the time with the legendary 250 GTO so the GT40 had started taking the crown away from Ferrari on its own turf first).

Following that, Ford and Shelby won again a month later at the Sebring 12 hour endurance race. Armed with experience and knowledge, Ford returned in 1966 to Daytona, which had just switched to a 24 hour format. Ford and Shelby won again with three Ford GT40's taking the three top podium spots. A month later, the exact same thing happened with all three top spots going to Ford GT40's at the 12 Hours of Sebring race. That ultimately led to the iconic finish at Le Mans with three GT40's once again winning the three top spots and, of course, beating Ferrari. It then went on to win for 4 consecutive years; from 1966 to 1969.

It's one of the best race car stories out there and that fact means any Ford GT has huge shoes to fill. The "second generation" Ford GT, which came out in 2004, was not a true successor to the GT40 in my opinion. Don't get me wrong, it was a fantastic thing. It is on my must-drive bucket list of cars and think it should be on everyone's list. But it was a tribute. It was an excellent tribute, but a tribute nonetheless. It just couldn't trace its own roots in racing. It didn't come out with the purpose and focus of the original; track dominance. The current Ford GT, though, is different.

Back in the day, it was much more common for production cars to be homologated cars to allow competition in racing. Such was the case for the original BMW M3, for example. The original Mustang Boss 302 and Camaro Z/28, original (C2) Corvette Grand Sport, a myriad of Porsches, etc. That isn't the case anymore, though, as you can see by the rarity of modern homologation cars listed on FIA's website (link: FIA Historic Database - Homologation Cars). Porsche, for example, has 59 cars listed and non of them (that's zero) are from the year 2000 or newer and only 4 are 1990's cars. The GT, then, is a breath of fresh air of true racing-based development.

I don't know if Ford first decided they want to race a factory mid engine car or they first wanted to produce another Ford GT and wanted it to be a thoroughbred. But that matters little at this point, because this Ford GT had already completed an entire season of racing in 2016 before Ford rolled even a single road going version off the production line. This is your first clue about how serious this car is. But there are more similarities too.

Like the original GT40, Ford also ran into some teething issues at first with the new one, although not nearly as bad and didn't last as long. In its debut race in 2016, two Ford GT's finished 7th and 9th in their GTLM class. Not as bad as a DNF, but nothing to write home about. Ford got its act together, though, and at the 2016 Le Mans 24 Hour Race - 50 years after its iconic 1-2-3 finish in 1966 at Le Mans, it won its class and even managed to take the top two podium spots; 1st and 2nd in LMGTE Pro. And at the next Daytona 24 Hour race in 2017, it won its GTLM class and also managed two podiums; 1st and 3rd.

Its winning streak wasn't as dominant as back in the 60's, but the car proved that it was very competitive with multiple podiums at Daytona, Sebring, and Le Mans in addition to its wins, which is more impressive given Ford's lack of comparable experience to the top competitors; the Porsche, Ferrari, and Corvette factory-backed racing teams. That means the new car has pedigree in spades. No one can say it's just a tribute like the last Ford GT. But if you're one of the fans, you may have some explaining to do every time you hear something along the lines of, say... why does it have a V6??

As far as car news, learning that the GT won't have another V8 like the last one and the original was one of the worst. But then, I am almost ashamed to admit, I started to warm up to the idea.
 For starters, this engine has been racing in a Daytona Prototype with Michael Shank Racing since the 2014 season. That gives it pedigree. If that's not enough, it has set the fastest lap (ever) on the Daytona oval of 40.364 seconds, beating even NASCAR race cars that should rule the Daytona 500 oval.

It also set a new record top speed of 222.971 mph, blowing the previous record of 210.364 mph out of the water. And it set a new record for the first 10 kms and the first 10 miles from standing starts. If the only problem you have with the engine is the number of cylinders vs a competitor with eight or more cylinders, then fight fire with fire. It may be down on number of cylinders but it's (very) up on number of records. But for me, and many car guys, numbers aren't the only thing that matters. But here, too, the little 3.5 litre V6 makes a very strong case for itself.

For starters, it has the same soul and good, humble nature that the previous engine had. It's based on a truck engine, just like the 5.4 litre supercharged V8 in the last Ford GT was. It's a working class hero, as Jeremy Clarkson put it multiple times. Then you get to packaging, where the smaller engine means a smaller engine bay that allows for the stunning teardrop shape with the flying buttresses where the air-to-air intercoolers live. That, in turn, also allows for excellent aerodynamics.

Well, what about noise? How could a V6 stand up to the V8's in Ferrari's and McLaren's? Well, it actually turned out to be far better than I expected. Fast forward to about 6:08 in video below to hear it from idle to WOT in a 1/2 mile run drag race. It sounds guttural and burbly at low rpms and almost like a small high-strung V8 at high rpms. The almost high strung V8-like noise may be harder to tell in the video because of the wind noise, but you can better tell when the car slows down and is downshifting at about 6:34 in. It's astonishing.

Don't just take my word for it, though. To quote Road & Track magazine, they said this about the noise: "Fear not: The street-legal GT sounds excellent. Turbo whoosh is subtle, an undertone of boost beneath the engine note. The sound is somewhere between a silken straight-six and an exotic small-bore V8, a subdued but purposeful growl. Imagine a McLaren 570S with a higher redline and a little less rasp, and you'll be on the right track. It's worlds away from the woeful moan of the Le Mans racer." Nice.

I actually enjoy hearing it now, and that's far more than I can say for any downsized engine that replaces a previously bigger, naturally aspirated engine with a higher cylinder count. Don't get me wrong, I still would have preferred to see a V8 in there, but I cannot reasonably defend the preference in any way. I can only say I just prefer a V8 and leave it at that.

When all of the above is combined, it draws a phenomenal picture. It's a stunning mid engine supercar with legendary heritage, forged in the fire of motorsport with multiple wins, powered by a record-breaking engine, and goes, drives, and sounds like nothing else. More importantly, it draws a picture of a legendary name attached to a car that is worthy of it. And tomorrow, you should tune in to watch another battle between it, Ferrari, and a grid of other magnificent race cars.

Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!


Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.

Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.

🔥 Most Visited This Week

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would

GTR vs Evo X vs STI: which has the best AWD system?

A few weeks ago, I made a post explaining  mainstream AWD system types and how they compare , pros and cons, etc. including some simple diagrams to show where the power goes and how much. As promised, this post will focus on specific cars and what AWD systems they use, especially ones that that have more or less been defined by their AWD systems, and the best place to start may be with a bombshell; the Nissan GT-R. Nissan GT-R (R35) The GT-R has built a reputation around having monster traction and very approachable performance, thanks to its AWD system - Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain (ATTESA) - and what it can do for you. But the GT-R doesn't actually use the most mechanically sophisticated type of AWD systems discussed in the previous article, namely a "true" AWD with a centre differential. Instead, it uses a clutch pack to transfer power. RWD-based clutch-type AWD schematic - Rams Eye The Track Guy © The R32, R33, and R34 Sky

How would a Mustang 3.5L EcoBoost compare to the 5.0L V8?

Ever wonder how a 3.5 litre EcoBoost might fair against the 5.0 litre V8 in the Mustang? Of course you have. Ever since Ford dropped it in the F150 (and perhaps well before), everyone has been wondering how it would perform. There are basically two camps; those who think it would be awesome because of tuneability and power potential and those who think it means the death of the V8 in the Mustang. If you are in the latter group, we seem to be good so far with continuous upgrades to the 5.0 litre Coyote and the brand new Shelby GT500 which still uses a supercharged V8 as it has been for over a decade and multiple iterations. But what if... Well, it seems we are closer than ever to finding out the answer to that question. American Trucks recently got together two crew cab, short box, 4x4 F150's but one has the 5.0 litre V8 and the other has the 3.5 litre EcoBoost V6. There has been a few comparisons between 5.0 litre and 3.5 litre EB F150's, but this seems to be the most di

Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R Track Review

2012 Boss 302 on square 305/30/19 RE-71R's at AMP - Graham MacNeil © For better or for worse, I have heard and read so much about RE-71R's. Everyone swears by the grip but complains about the wear. Generally speaking, the pros are: 1. They grip as well or better than most R comps. 2. They don't wear as quickly as R comps if driven occasionally on the street. 3. They work better in the rain than R comps. The cons were limited to overheating quickly when used on track (being an autocross tire) and wearing too fast on heavy cars like mine. In the popular 200 TW category, they are faster than the popular Hankook RS-4's and BFGoodrich Rival S's according to published Tire Rack Tests. According to plenty of reviews, they are also faster than well established R comps like R888R's (which don't seem to work too well on heavy cars anyway) and the venerable NT01's. But I was still hesitant for a while until I talked to a tire tech support gentleman