Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

The S209 is a big turbo wide-body WRX STI


A Subaru WRX STI is a very familiar car by now. Partially because it's very successful and capable, but partially because its engine and hp has been more or less unchanged for about 15 years in North America. It came out in 2004 with a 4 cylinder 2.5 litre turbocharged boxer engine making 300 hp. Today, the standard issue WRX STI is still powered by a version of that same engine making all of 305 hp, a measly 5 hp increase in two redesigns over 15 years. People have been complaining and, it turns out, Subaru has been listening.


Enter the S209. It is based on the Japanese market only S208 developed with Subaru Tecnica International (STI). It still uses the same North American EJ25 2.5 litre engine, but it's all grown up now with forged rods and pistons, and a bigger turbo (bigger turbos make everything better). In this case, it seems like the housing is the same, but HKS increases the compressor wheel by 5 mm to 65 mm and turbine by 3 mm to 56 mm. That has allowed Subaru to turn the boost up to 11.. err 18 psi, rather, which is a 3.3 psi increase over the standard STI.

That has had a profound effect on power, going from 305 hp to 341 hp - an increase of 36 hp - and torque goes up from 290 lb-ft to 315 lb-ft - an increase of 25 lb-ft. Both are very healthy upgrades, although those are just estimates. Subaru hasn't confirmed the final numbers but I suspect "estimated" is as good as "it will make at least that much, maybe a little bit more." That should allow a 0-60 mph time in the low to mid 4 second range. To help keep things cool, a water-cooling system that sprays water on the intercooler can help keep max temperatures down. The system is operated manually with paddles behind the steering wheel and gives you a 2-second spray that's supposedly worth about 5 hp (presumably at peak temperatures).

Of course, more horsepower is no good unless you can use it. Thankfully, there's a bunch more goodies.


More than just stiffer springs, Subaru is stiffening the S209 chassis with additional bracing. There are two diagonal braces up front and another brace connecting the rear strut towers. The rear isn't just a piece of metal, though, it also includes springs to preload the chassis that should stiffen the rear suspension without upsetting ride quality that much. Lateral suspension links also lose bushings and get ball/spherical joints to tighten response and reduce deflection. But of course, a stiffer suspension is here too, with Bilstein dampers, stiffer springs, and a stiffer rear anti-roll bar.

To take advantage of the upgraded suspension and engine, there're bigger (and better) tires. The tires are bespoke Dunlop SP Sport Maxx GT 600A tires measuring 265 wide all around, up front 245 on the standard car. The tires are wrapped around new forged 19" BBS wheels with more offset to widen the suspension track by 0.6" (approx. 15 mm). The wider wheels and tires require a wider body so wide-body front fenders and rear fender flares are present to widen the body by 1.7" (approx. 43 mm) along with side skirts to complete the wide-body look.


All the chassis and suspension upgrades allow the car to pull more than lateral 1.0 g on a skidpad. And all of this should also work at high speeds, thanks to a larger rear spoiler and front dive plans/cunards. Better still, all the extra power and corner speed should be no problem to erase if need be, thanks to upgraded brake pads and brake calipers. The standard WRX STI comes with four-piston Brembo calipers in the front and 2-piston Brembo calipers in the back. In the S209, you get six-piston front calipers and four-piston rears, all made by Brembo.

Subaru wanted to find out how well it worked on track so it handed a pre-production STI S209 to Car and Driver (C&D) to test at Virginia International Raceway (VIR) where C&D has been holding an annual track battle between the newest performance cars for over 10 years. That means there's a wealth of track data and lap times to compare to. The target was a lap time of 2:59.8, the same time a Cadillac ATS-V laid down - allowing it to handily beat the BMW M4 (which was nearly a second slower at 3:00.7).


C&D wouldn't release their best time. They'll do that later in the year. But they did give a "sneak peak". They were running only a tenth or two behind that target lap time of 2:59.8, meaning they easily beat a BMW M4 (with the dual clutch automatic and carbon ceramic brakes, no less). That also put it about 5 seconds ahead of the current most extreme WRX STI in North America; the WRX STI Type RA (RA stands for Record Attempt). Want to watch the S209 terrorize a race track? We'll have to wait until later. But, for now, you can look at the next best thing - the Type RA - hot lap at VIR.


Pricing hasn't been announced, but the Type RA cost nearly $50,000. All those upgrades, combined with Subaru's plan to sell "around 200", will likely jack the price up to near BMW M3 levels. Do you think it's worth it? It's hugely desirable, but I'm not sure if the value is there to anyone who isn't a die-hard Subaru WRX fan.

Follow Rams Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!





Comments

  1. Ran the grand course in November and best time was a 3:00:8.

    That video of the RA lap. The understeer was painful, but that's the norm in a stock Subaru. As for the driver...stop shuffle steering! And the line through hog pen...not good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree! I have no experience with VIR, but I have noticed a couple of times that C/D testers don't adjust much from car to car in LL videos. I don't know much about the Yokohama tires on it. Maybe they are actually working well when they sound like that with a bit of slip, but if not, wrangling a stock STI into a corner like that squealing all the way is likely not the fastest way around. My experience is that they catapult out of corners. Very much slow-in-fast-out kind of car. I can imagine coming in this hot is just delaying how early they can get back on the power.

      Delete
  2. Oh. that 3:00:8 was in a 2006 STI. Full cage, RCE T2 coilovers, Toyo R888R tires, and 300 whp.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's very impressive! A newer 2011 STI sedan did the deed in 3:13.8 in their hands. 13 seconds is an eternity.

      Delete

Post a Comment







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

Limited Slip Differentials - The Basics

I'm finishing up a comparison post (link to introduction: Intro: Focus RS vs Golf R vs WRX STI vs Evo X ) and, throughout the post, I realized that I have to go off topic a lot to talk about how each type of differential changes the way the car drives. As a result, I thought I'd write a separate post to go into more detail before I post the comparison to keep it more focused on the cars and avoid veering off topic too much. By saying "Limited Slip Differentials" in the title, I am including torque vectoring diffs because, although current conventional terminology treats them differently, a torque vectoring differential is, in essence, a very sophisticated limited slip diff (LSD) that can be manipulated to actively help the car handle better. And while none of the cars in the comparison use open (without help from the brakes) or non-gear mechanical LSD’s, I’ll briefly discuss them so that the post is more inclusive. I’ll only focus on using power to help the...

Ford Focus RS vs Subaru WRX STI vs Mitsubishi Evo X MR

All these cars have one common Achilles' heel. The engines sit entirely ahead of the front axles; a great family recipe for understeer. Then tell the front tires - already taxed from trying to keep that front engine sitting outside the wheelbase from going straight - to put some power down and you can only make matters worse. There are ways to mitigate the understeer with suspension tuning, of course, but the toughest part is power-on understeer. I don't want to get much into tires, but the thing to remember is that because tires have a certain "grip budget" - how much total grip they can hold/generate before they let go - when you get on the power in a car that sends power to the front wheels (FWD or AWD), you will rob some of the precious grip you were relying on to turn the car in order to put all or some power down. You'll run out of front lateral grip sooner than you would have otherwise, as a result. Worse yet, because of the unideal en...

2015 Mustang GT breaks into the 11's in the 1/4 mile!

It went 11.77 seconds to be exact and past the traps at 116 mph and that's with minor modifications. The modifications were courtesy of the folks at Ford Racing. They recently got a hold of three 2015 Mustangs, one with the 2.3L EcoBoost engine making 310 hp and two GT's with the 5.0L V8 making 435 hp. The power modifications are minor for two of the three Mustangs. The 2.3 EcoBoost gets a "Prototype Off-Road Exhaust" which most likely means there are no catalytic converters or "cats", a more free flowing exhaust and a tune. One of the GT's gets the same off-road exhaust treatment and a tune plus "ARH Cobra Jet Long Tube Headers". In the video, they say they did "a few changes to the air intake system but basically these are close to what any consumer can buy" so they may have included a K&N drop-in filter which FRPP Performance Packs for the 2014 Mustang GT included or an aftermarket CAI with a cone style filter....

2016 Mustang EcoBoost Track Review

Photography by: Graham MacNeil Ford really wants to sell you a Mustang with a turbo four cylinder. They started by derating the V6 engine in the 2015 S550 compared to the 2011-2014 S197 V6 to make the EcoBoost 2.3 litre more differentiated. Then, they offered a performance pack on the EcoBoost but not on the V6. Now, they killed the V6 all together for 2018 and will only sell you a V8 or this EcoBoost. I love a good V8, everyone who knows me knows that. This is a Mustang, which means it needs a V8. If those aren't enough reasons, I always prefer natural aspiration over forced induction. That's three strikes against the EcoBoost-powered Mustang. But I'd be lying if I said the idea never intrigued me. It's the lightest (if you account for features). It has the best weight distribution. It has the same great chassis as the GT. It's very affordable and it has a lot of potential to make more power. Aftermarket? Endless support. There's plenty of good about it....