Skip to main content

The S209 is a big turbo wide-body WRX STI

A Subaru WRX STI is a very familiar car by now. Partially because it's very successful and capable, but partially because its engine and hp has been more or less unchanged for about 15 years in North America. It came out in 2004 with a 4 cylinder 2.5 litre turbocharged boxer engine making 300 hp. Today, the standard issue WRX STI is still powered by a version of that same engine making all of 305 hp, a measly 5 hp increase in two redesigns over 15 years. People have been complaining and, it turns out, Subaru has been listening.

Enter the S209. It is based on the Japanese market only S208 developed with Subaru Tecnica International (STI). It still uses the same North American EJ25 2.5 litre engine, but it's all grown up now with forged rods and pistons, and a bigger turbo (bigger turbos make everything better). In this case, it seems like the housing is the same, but HKS increases the compressor wheel by 5 mm to 65 mm and turbine by 3 mm to 56 mm. That has allowed Subaru to turn the boost up to 11.. err 18 psi, rather, which is a 3.3 psi increase over the standard STI.

That has had a profound effect on power, going from 305 hp to 341 hp - an increase of 36 hp - and torque goes up from 290 lb-ft to 315 lb-ft - an increase of 25 lb-ft. Both are very healthy upgrades, although those are just estimates. Subaru hasn't confirmed the final numbers but I suspect "estimated" is as good as "it will make at least that much, maybe a little bit more." That should allow a 0-60 mph time in the low to mid 4 second range. To help keep things cool, a water-cooling system that sprays water on the intercooler can help keep max temperatures down. The system is operated manually with paddles behind the steering wheel and gives you a 2-second spray that's supposedly worth about 5 hp (presumably at peak temperatures).

Of course, more horsepower is no good unless you can use it. Thankfully, there's a bunch more goodies.

More than just stiffer springs, Subaru is stiffening the S209 chassis with additional bracing. There are two diagonal braces up front and another brace connecting the rear strut towers. The rear isn't just a piece of metal, though, it also includes springs to preload the chassis that should stiffen the rear suspension without upsetting ride quality that much. Lateral suspension links also lose bushings and get ball/spherical joints to tighten response and reduce deflection. But of course, a stiffer suspension is here too, with Bilstein dampers, stiffer springs, and a stiffer rear anti-roll bar.

To take advantage of the upgraded suspension and engine, there're bigger (and better) tires. The tires are bespoke Dunlop SP Sport Maxx GT 600A tires measuring 265 wide all around, up front 245 on the standard car. The tires are wrapped around new forged 19" BBS wheels with more offset to widen the suspension track by 0.6" (approx. 15 mm). The wider wheels and tires require a wider body so wide-body front fenders and rear fender flares are present to widen the body by 1.7" (approx. 43 mm) along with side skirts to complete the wide-body look.

All the chassis and suspension upgrades allow the car to pull more than lateral 1.0 g on a skidpad. And all of this should also work at high speeds, thanks to a larger rear spoiler and front dive plans/cunards. Better still, all the extra power and corner speed should be no problem to erase if need be, thanks to upgraded brake pads and brake calipers. The standard WRX STI comes with four-piston Brembo calipers in the front and 2-piston Brembo calipers in the back. In the S209, you get six-piston front calipers and four-piston rears, all made by Brembo.

Subaru wanted to find out how well it worked on track so it handed a pre-production STI S209 to Car and Driver (C&D) to test at Virginia International Raceway (VIR) where C&D has been holding an annual track battle between the newest performance cars for over 10 years. That means there's a wealth of track data and lap times to compare to. The target was a lap time of 2:59.8, the same time a Cadillac ATS-V laid down - allowing it to handily beat the BMW M4 (which was nearly a second slower at 3:00.7).

C&D wouldn't release their best time. They'll do that later in the year. But they did give a "sneak peak". They were running only a tenth or two behind that target lap time of 2:59.8, meaning they easily beat a BMW M4 (with the dual clutch automatic and carbon ceramic brakes, no less). That also put it about 5 seconds ahead of the current most extreme WRX STI in North America; the WRX STI Type RA (RA stands for Record Attempt). Want to watch the S209 terrorize a race track? We'll have to wait until later. But, for now, you can look at the next best thing - the Type RA - hot lap at VIR.

Pricing hasn't been announced, but the Type RA cost nearly $50,000. All those upgrades, combined with Subaru's plan to sell "around 200", will likely jack the price up to near BMW M3 levels. Do you think it's worth it? It's hugely desirable, but I'm not sure if the value is there to anyone who isn't a die-hard Subaru WRX fan.

Follow Rams Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!


  1. Ran the grand course in November and best time was a 3:00:8.

    That video of the RA lap. The understeer was painful, but that's the norm in a stock Subaru. As for the driver...stop shuffle steering! And the line through hog pen...not good.

    1. I agree! I have no experience with VIR, but I have noticed a couple of times that C/D testers don't adjust much from car to car in LL videos. I don't know much about the Yokohama tires on it. Maybe they are actually working well when they sound like that with a bit of slip, but if not, wrangling a stock STI into a corner like that squealing all the way is likely not the fastest way around. My experience is that they catapult out of corners. Very much slow-in-fast-out kind of car. I can imagine coming in this hot is just delaying how early they can get back on the power.

  2. Oh. that 3:00:8 was in a 2006 STI. Full cage, RCE T2 coilovers, Toyo R888R tires, and 300 whp.

    1. That's very impressive! A newer 2011 STI sedan did the deed in 3:13.8 in their hands. 13 seconds is an eternity.


Post a Comment

Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.

Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.

🔥 Most Visited This Week

Falken Azenis RT615k+ Street and Track Review

Last year, I picked up a 2009 Lancer Ralliart to do a long term test with it as a dual duty track/daily. One of the first things I knew I was going to do was put a decent set of tires on it. The car came without OEM wheels which was actually good because I didn't have to hesitate about getting a good set of aftermarket wheels to support going wider. Thankfully, my friends at YST Auto Halifax  set me up with a great set of Superspeed RF03RR wheels. The Wheels I had never even heard of Superspeed but I trusted the good folk at YST Auto who mentioned some customer cars running on track with them. These wheels are rotary forged which is basically a prerequisite to be taken seriously in this market populated by companies like TSW and Fast Wheels. The wheels looked like a high quality, well finished wheel and each had a "QC" check sticker on. Just for appearances? Maybe, but I found no defects. The wheels seemed easy to balance (didn't need many weights) and at 18.1 lb. f

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track load

GTR vs Evo X vs STI: which has the best AWD system?

A few weeks ago, I made a post explaining  mainstream AWD system types and how they compare , pros and cons, etc. including some simple diagrams to show where the power goes and how much. As promised, this post will focus on specific cars and what AWD systems they use, especially ones that that have more or less been defined by their AWD systems, and the best place to start may be with a bombshell; the Nissan GT-R. Nissan GT-R (R35) The GT-R has built a reputation around having monster traction and very approachable performance, thanks to its AWD system - Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain (ATTESA) - and what it can do for you. But the GT-R doesn't actually use the most mechanically sophisticated type of AWD systems discussed in the previous article, namely a "true" AWD with a centre differential. Instead, it uses a clutch pack to transfer power. RWD-based clutch-type AWD schematic - Rams Eye The Track Guy © The R32, R33, and R34 Sky

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity. Grip is noticeably l