Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

Nigel Mansell's dominant Red 5 Williams F1 Car is going up for Sale


The dominance of the Williams FW14B is undeniable, even if the tech may be called into question. It took Nigel Mansell to his first (and only) F1 world title in 1992, the first time a British had won it since 1976. It qualified on a pole position 7 times out of its 13 races. And despite facing off against Ayrton Senna and Michael Schumacher, it set the record of 9 Grand Prix wins in a single season.

To this day, the car remains one of the most advanced F1 cars of all time due to rule changes in 1994 that banned a lot of the technology. It came with a semi automatic gearbox (which was just starting to take over), traction control, and active load-leveling hydraulic suspension. To allow all of this to work properly with the required fail-safes, Williams ended up having to come up with their own controller and their own programming.

The hydraulic load leveling suspension was initially meant to be an all mechanical system so it was a complete transformation in controls. And in an age where you can buy a programmable microchip online for next to nothing, this might not seem like much, but back in the early 90's, doing your own controls from scratch was a major undertaking.

Williams FW14B 'Red 5' suspension and hydraulic actuator - Williams F1 TV ©
The load leveling suspension was more than just an active suspension. Due to the fact that ride height was actively adjustable, it could always maintain the optimal ride height of the car for aerodynamics, regardless of corner loads and suspension movement. In other words, it had active suspension and, indirectly, aerodynamics. F1 driver Riccardo Patrese described it as working like it's always in the wind tunnel.

Going beyond even the active suspension's inherent capabilities, the system allowed Williams to create a form of a Drag Reduction Systems (DRS). They noticed in testing that their active suspension car was actually slower at the end of straights by 2-3 km/h (1-2 mph) compared to their passive suspension car. They had already decided to run the active suspension car because it was working so well and it was posting quicker overall times but they wanted to gain every advantage possible so they looked further into the root cause.

They found that the passive suspension car was "stalling"; a term used in aerodynamics engineering to describe lift or downforce elements such as spoilers, wings, spoilers, etc. losing effectiveness due to their angle of attack changing. Because the passive suspension car changed its ride height in response to suspension loading, it caused the stall condition which resulted in reducing drag and allowing the passive car to reach higher speeds. To allow the active car to stall, they introduced a manual override to drop the ride height of the car, essentially creating the first DRS.

You can watch the 6 minute Williams F1 video below about what went into development which is just astonishing. It was so dominant that it allowed Nigel Mansell to secure his title a whole 5 races before the end of the season. And its designer - Adrian Newey - is still active today as Chief Technical Officer of the Red Bull Racing team, speaking volumes of his relevance.

It has been owned by a single private owner since Williams originally sold it and has been dormant until 2017.  Former F1 driver Karun Chandhok took it out for Williams' 40th anniversary celebration at Silverstone and the Renault V10 and hydraulic active suspension are reportedly working properly.


How much will it go for?

The car is being auctioned by Bonham, which is no stranger to historic F1 cars. Bonhams sold Ayrton Senna's McLaren-Ford MP4/8 last year for €4.2 million which won him the Monaco Grand Prix. That is roughly £3.8 million in today's money ($4.8 million USD). The record for the most money paid for an F1 car is £5.6 million ($7.3 million USD) for Michael Schumacher’s 2001.

That should give a ballpark for what something like this might go for. Bonham isn't providing an estimate, but there's speculation that it will go for close to £3 million ($3.9 million USD) according to Motorsport magazine. If you want a chance to bid, it will be at this year’s Goodwood Festival of Speed presented by Mastercard on 5th July.

Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!





Comments







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

The New Mustang Mach 1 Heads to Dealers. Here's why it matters.

No, it's not because it's called Mach 1 or the heritage that comes with the name, although that's pretty cool for Mustang fans. There are few cars out there that have the widespread track use of Mustangs. A combination of affordability, a decent RWD platform with endless aftermarket support and the potential to be competitive when properly set up makes them a staple in most track paddocks in North America. But being popular for track use comes with some headaches for manufacturers. It means that the car will be pushed hard by its customers and that will inevitably lead to discovering weak links .  The vast majority of factory main-stream performance cars have limitations on track when pushed to hot lapping pace. That's not to say they are all equal - some are, without a doubt, far more durable and dependable than others - but nearly all require modifications. Mustangs are no exception. And their popularity also means those weak links are discovered fast, and marketing d

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track load

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity. Grip is noticeably l

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would