Skip to main content

Snow/Ice Rallycross in the Rabbit

My 07 Rabbit at BAC Rallycross #2 2018-2019 (I was having A LOT more fun than I look...) - Kevin Doubleday ©

FWD cars don't win the WRC anymore and they haven't in decades. In fact, all two wheel drive (2WD) cars have been rendered entirely obsolete on the world stage by the original legendary Audi Quattro. That's because 4 driven wheels are obviously far better at putting power down than just 2 and when you are on a loose surface such as mud, gravel, or snow, traction is in SERIOUS short supply. Thankfully, I'm not on the world rally stage or competing for the world title, so I'm happy with my little FWD rallycross car (for now anyway...).

I have already been to one event this season (which is my first rallycross season) in this car. You can read more about it here where I nearly caught air going over one of the bumps. Last time was on gravel, though. This time, it was a snow covered course and what I didn't know was that snow wasn't covering gravel. It was covering ice. What could possibly go wrong?

In what I seriously fear will turn into a tradition, I once again set the slowest time of the day in my first session: 96.47 seconds. If you haven't read my post (linked above) about my first rallycross event, the same thing happened at the last event where I set the slowest time of the day in my first session out. One big issue was my confidence. Feeling like I had got a handle on things after my first event, I pushed harder than I should have and the ice hiding underneath the snow in most corners rewarded me with an almost complete 180 degree spin.

FWD Cars Can Dance Too

My lack of experience doing hot laps on ice was made worse by my decision to fix the balance of the car. Having suffered all that understeer my first time out, I employed the quickest and cheapest guaranteed cure to understeer on snow and ice; leave all seasons tires in the back and put winter tires on the front. The car became more tail happy than a puppy dog discovering toys and treats for the first time. That's exactly what I wanted, but I had forgotten to adjust my driving into the corners to make up for the newfound handling balance. That led to the spin, which cost me several seconds. Fortunately, the rest of the day was much better.

My next session out, my time dropped to 83.63; a huge improvement of almost 13 seconds. I still wasn't competitive, though. My class (i.e. stock 2WD) leader had a best time of 79.41 s the first session out, which had dropped to 76.12 in the second session. As a result, I decided to go out with Dave H. He's a seasoned FWD rallycross driver and was around since the beginning of local rallycross. He pointed out a few problems.

(Rallycross) School is in Session

4WD/AWD cars are clearly a more popular choice for rallycross...

First, I was too cautious with my driving. I wasn't cutting close enough to the cones because I was too afraid to hit one and get a penalty. As with everything in motorsports, if you never find the limit, you never know exactly how close you are to it. He said it took him a few runs (and a few cones) to get a feel for exactly where the edge of the car is. I needed to do the same. I also shouldn't be afraid to hit the cones. If I focus on avoiding them, I will leave too much time on the table.

The second problem was that I was not committing enough to the throttle coming out of turns (sideways) to keep the front wheels pulling me in the direction I want to go. Sometimes, I would back off slightly out of habit to regain traction. That was slowing me down.

Finally, I was too busy with the handbrake. I was using the handbrake to adjust my line mid-corner and I should only use it in corner entry to provoke the back end of the car to rotate, but once I am in the middle of the corner, I shouldn't need to use it anymore (the real problem there, of course, was that I wasn't setting up my line in corner entry well enough to avoid the need for mid corner corrections in order stay on the proper line through the corner).

Not Quite Winning, but...

Yoda's guidance worked. My third session, my best time dropped to 77.10 seconds. Class leader? That dropped to 74.28 seconds; a gap of 2.82 seconds. Nearly 3 seconds is an eternity on a 70+ second lap. But what's important is progress. Last event, my best of the day was a whopping 6+ seconds off the class leader's best of the day and it was nearly 2 seconds slower than the class leader's WORST of the day. This event, the gap between my best and class leader's best was less than half the gap from the first event and it was also over 2 seconds quicker than his worst of the day.

Given that this course is nearly a third (32%) longer, a 2-3 second gap here is also closer than a 2-3 second gap at the last event. It's still an eternity, but some eternities are shorter than others, just like mathematicians will tell you that some infinities are smaller than others. The progress also confirms what I was told at the last event, which is that all season tires were probably slowing me down by 3-4 seconds. My best of the day at last event after I had got the hang of it was over 6 seconds slower than it needed to be, but here it dropped to being under 3 seconds slower, and on a longer course.

My last session of the day, I decided to try starting off in 2nd gear because my front wheels were spinning endlessly on ice during every launch. That can work on the street when you are having trouble taking off in low traction conditions. In competition? The car bogged down, with a session time of 78.09, nearly a second slower. Another lesson learned, don't start in 2nd gear.

Race Car Driver Excuses

I did a repeat performance of my first event; dead last in class. But, if you exclude my first two runs (and everyone else's) where I was learning the course and rallycross on ice, I would have finished exactly middle of the class. Everyone was also learning the course, but at a far less steep learning curve due to my relative lack of experience. Middle of class wouldn't have been great, but it wouldn't have been bad for my second time out. Now I just need to not screw up so badly the first half of the day.

Nearly worn Federal Himalaya WS2 Winter Tires

I also tried to put some blame on my used Federal winter tires. When I went out with Yoda to help me, I noticed his car (also FWD) had far better traction. I told myself I must just be making excuses. However, we were hit with a decent snow fall a few days after the event and I was driving the rallycross car on the road. Having a much better frame of reference on the road, I noticed that the grip from my tires were in fact much worse compared to every other winter tire I've used on the road.

Time for new, better winter tires perhaps? I'm certainly tempted. I think I will put the crappy winter tires on the back and put fresh winters on the front. Stick around to find out how the next event goes, which is this coming weekend!

And this is why you want an AWD car for rallying... 

Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!


Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.

Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.

🔥 Most Visited This Week

GTR vs Evo X vs STI: which has the best AWD system?

A few weeks ago, I made a post explaining  mainstream AWD system types and how they compare , pros and cons, etc. including some simple diagrams to show where the power goes and how much. As promised, this post will focus on specific cars and what AWD systems they use, especially ones that that have more or less been defined by their AWD systems, and the best place to start may be with a bombshell; the Nissan GT-R. Nissan GT-R (R35) The GT-R has built a reputation around having monster traction and very approachable performance, thanks to its AWD system - Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain (ATTESA) - and what it can do for you. But the GT-R doesn't actually use the most mechanically sophisticated type of AWD systems discussed in the previous article, namely a "true" AWD with a centre differential. Instead, it uses a clutch pack to transfer power. RWD-based clutch-type AWD schematic - Rams Eye The Track Guy © The R32, R33, and R34 Sky

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would

All Mainstream AWD and 4WD Systems Compared and Explained

Mitsubishi Evo X GSR at Atlantic Motorsport Park - Kevin Doubleday  © If you live in Canada or the US, you'll find that plenty of people hold sacred the terms '4x4' and '4WD' to describe a 'true 4x4', where you have a butch transfer case with a low speed, perhaps a body on frame chassis, and ideally a solid axle or two. I'm not sure how that translates to the rest of the world. My extensive research into the motoring industry in Europe (which exclusively consists of watching Top Gear and The Grand Tour...) concluded that most people across the pond simply refer to any vehicle that is capable of sending any power to all four wheels as a 4WD vehicle, further muddying the waters. Where I grew up, 4x4 was more or less synonymous with 'Jeep' so that's not much help either. However, despite all various systems attempting to do the same sort of thing - distribute power between all four wheels instead of two - not all systems are created equal,

How would a Mustang 3.5L EcoBoost compare to the 5.0L V8?

Ever wonder how a 3.5 litre EcoBoost might fair against the 5.0 litre V8 in the Mustang? Of course you have. Ever since Ford dropped it in the F150 (and perhaps well before), everyone has been wondering how it would perform. There are basically two camps; those who think it would be awesome because of tuneability and power potential and those who think it means the death of the V8 in the Mustang. If you are in the latter group, we seem to be good so far with continuous upgrades to the 5.0 litre Coyote and the brand new Shelby GT500 which still uses a supercharged V8 as it has been for over a decade and multiple iterations. But what if... Well, it seems we are closer than ever to finding out the answer to that question. American Trucks recently got together two crew cab, short box, 4x4 F150's but one has the 5.0 litre V8 and the other has the 3.5 litre EcoBoost V6. There has been a few comparisons between 5.0 litre and 3.5 litre EB F150's, but this seems to be the most di