Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

2020 Mustang Could Get Mid-range Ecoboost Option


Ford has been promoting its EcoBoost engine options for quite some time now, replacing larger engines with smaller, turbocharged EcoBoost engines in all of its offerings. The Mustang wasn't safe in the 6th Generation redesign (code named S550) when it debuted in 2014 for the 2015 model year. It gained a turbocharged 2.3 litre 4 cylinder EcoBoost engine making 310 hp.

The previous base engine, a 3.7 litre V6 making 305 hp was down-rated to 300 hp to create a larger gap and position the EcoBoost firmly as a mid-range engine. But since the refresh for 2018, the V6 has been dropped all together, leaving the Mustang lineup with only two engine options, the 4 cylinder EcoBoost with 310 hp and the upgraded 5.0 litre V8 making 460 hp. But It seems like Ford may be ready to insert another option in the 150 hp valley between those two options as a mid-range engine.


Hagerty recently discovered a document filed by Ford to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in the US and dated Feb 8, 2019. The document lists the various VIN (vehicle identification number) codes, including the engine codes and there are more engine options than you'd expect.

Engine code 'H' is the familiar 2.3L EcoBoost engine making 310 hp. But there is another engine option, code 'D', that is also a 2.3 litre option with horsepower figure To Be Determined (TBD). The chances of the other engine option having lower hp are basically slim to none. Ford already sells a version of that engine with much higher hp, of course, namely in the Focus RS with 350 hp.

Moreover, there are already various upgrade packages for that engine through aftermarket partners such as mountune in the UK or tuning arms such as Ford Performance in North America. Both offer packages that boost power by 25 hp to 335 hp and torque goes from freight train to steam liner up to 390 lb-ft in the Ford Performance pack and 490 Nm in the mountune pack (361 lb-ft). In fact, for 2018, Ford already boosted the torque of the little 4 cylinder engine from 320 lb-ft to 350 lb-ft (474 Nm), although power was unchanged.

Other Juicy Bits?



There could be more to that document too. Judging by the engine descriptions, naturally aspirated engines get a TIVCT designation (short for Twin Independent Variable Camshaft Timing, meaning camshaft timing is variable for both intake and exhaust cams, and they are independent). Boosted engines don't.

There's a 5.2 litre TIVCT V8 making 526 hp, which is the naturally aspirated Shelby GT350 engine. There is also a 5.2 litre V8 without a hp rating or TIVCT designation, indicating it's likely the GT500 supercharged engine (more details on that here). Then there is the 5.0 litre rated at 435 hp, which was the rating for model years 2015-2017 but it was updated to 460 hp and it is also missing TIVCT... it's not clear what this could mean.

It certainly won't be getting boost since that would be higher hp. Could it be getting a mild hybrid system? Ford already confirmed a hybrid Mustang is coming but that was expected to be after the current generation is redesigned.


The other 5.0 litre engine labelled TIVCT also has the hp figure TBD, which could indicate that the Mustang GT could be getting another hp boost in 2020. Another possibility, however, could just mean two 5.0 litre options , one in the 'base' GT and the other in the 'Bullitt' if it returns in 2020. Only time will tell.

For now, though, it seems all but guaranteed that there will be a more powerful mid-range option of the 2.3 litre EcoBoost engine. Would you like to see a more powerful EcoBoost engine option added to the 2020 Mustang lineup? I'm not one to say no to more horsepower so that would be a resounding 'YES' from me.

Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!





Comments







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would

GTR vs Evo X vs STI: which has the best AWD system?

A few weeks ago, I made a post explaining  mainstream AWD system types and how they compare , pros and cons, etc. including some simple diagrams to show where the power goes and how much. As promised, this post will focus on specific cars and what AWD systems they use, especially ones that that have more or less been defined by their AWD systems, and the best place to start may be with a bombshell; the Nissan GT-R. Nissan GT-R (R35) The GT-R has built a reputation around having monster traction and very approachable performance, thanks to its AWD system - Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain (ATTESA) - and what it can do for you. But the GT-R doesn't actually use the most mechanically sophisticated type of AWD systems discussed in the previous article, namely a "true" AWD with a centre differential. Instead, it uses a clutch pack to transfer power. RWD-based clutch-type AWD schematic - Rams Eye The Track Guy © The R32, R33, and R34 Sky

How would a Mustang 3.5L EcoBoost compare to the 5.0L V8?

Ever wonder how a 3.5 litre EcoBoost might fair against the 5.0 litre V8 in the Mustang? Of course you have. Ever since Ford dropped it in the F150 (and perhaps well before), everyone has been wondering how it would perform. There are basically two camps; those who think it would be awesome because of tuneability and power potential and those who think it means the death of the V8 in the Mustang. If you are in the latter group, we seem to be good so far with continuous upgrades to the 5.0 litre Coyote and the brand new Shelby GT500 which still uses a supercharged V8 as it has been for over a decade and multiple iterations. But what if... Well, it seems we are closer than ever to finding out the answer to that question. American Trucks recently got together two crew cab, short box, 4x4 F150's but one has the 5.0 litre V8 and the other has the 3.5 litre EcoBoost V6. There has been a few comparisons between 5.0 litre and 3.5 litre EB F150's, but this seems to be the most di

Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R Track Review

2012 Boss 302 on square 305/30/19 RE-71R's at AMP - Graham MacNeil © For better or for worse, I have heard and read so much about RE-71R's. Everyone swears by the grip but complains about the wear. Generally speaking, the pros are: 1. They grip as well or better than most R comps. 2. They don't wear as quickly as R comps if driven occasionally on the street. 3. They work better in the rain than R comps. The cons were limited to overheating quickly when used on track (being an autocross tire) and wearing too fast on heavy cars like mine. In the popular 200 TW category, they are faster than the popular Hankook RS-4's and BFGoodrich Rival S's according to published Tire Rack Tests. According to plenty of reviews, they are also faster than well established R comps like R888R's (which don't seem to work too well on heavy cars anyway) and the venerable NT01's. But I was still hesitant for a while until I talked to a tire tech support gentleman