Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

2020 Mustang Could Get Mid-range Ecoboost Option


Ford has been promoting its EcoBoost engine options for quite some time now, replacing larger engines with smaller, turbocharged EcoBoost engines in all of its offerings. The Mustang wasn't safe in the 6th Generation redesign (code named S550) when it debuted in 2014 for the 2015 model year. It gained a turbocharged 2.3 litre 4 cylinder EcoBoost engine making 310 hp.

The previous base engine, a 3.7 litre V6 making 305 hp was down-rated to 300 hp to create a larger gap and position the EcoBoost firmly as a mid-range engine. But since the refresh for 2018, the V6 has been dropped all together, leaving the Mustang lineup with only two engine options, the 4 cylinder EcoBoost with 310 hp and the upgraded 5.0 litre V8 making 460 hp. But It seems like Ford may be ready to insert another option in the 150 hp valley between those two options as a mid-range engine.


Hagerty recently discovered a document filed by Ford to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in the US and dated Feb 8, 2019. The document lists the various VIN (vehicle identification number) codes, including the engine codes and there are more engine options than you'd expect.

Engine code 'H' is the familiar 2.3L EcoBoost engine making 310 hp. But there is another engine option, code 'D', that is also a 2.3 litre option with horsepower figure To Be Determined (TBD). The chances of the other engine option having lower hp are basically slim to none. Ford already sells a version of that engine with much higher hp, of course, namely in the Focus RS with 350 hp.

Moreover, there are already various upgrade packages for that engine through aftermarket partners such as mountune in the UK or tuning arms such as Ford Performance in North America. Both offer packages that boost power by 25 hp to 335 hp and torque goes from freight train to steam liner up to 390 lb-ft in the Ford Performance pack and 490 Nm in the mountune pack (361 lb-ft). In fact, for 2018, Ford already boosted the torque of the little 4 cylinder engine from 320 lb-ft to 350 lb-ft (474 Nm), although power was unchanged.

Other Juicy Bits?



There could be more to that document too. Judging by the engine descriptions, naturally aspirated engines get a TIVCT designation (short for Twin Independent Variable Camshaft Timing, meaning camshaft timing is variable for both intake and exhaust cams, and they are independent). Boosted engines don't.

There's a 5.2 litre TIVCT V8 making 526 hp, which is the naturally aspirated Shelby GT350 engine. There is also a 5.2 litre V8 without a hp rating or TIVCT designation, indicating it's likely the GT500 supercharged engine (more details on that here). Then there is the 5.0 litre rated at 435 hp, which was the rating for model years 2015-2017 but it was updated to 460 hp and it is also missing TIVCT... it's not clear what this could mean.

It certainly won't be getting boost since that would be higher hp. Could it be getting a mild hybrid system? Ford already confirmed a hybrid Mustang is coming but that was expected to be after the current generation is redesigned.


The other 5.0 litre engine labelled TIVCT also has the hp figure TBD, which could indicate that the Mustang GT could be getting another hp boost in 2020. Another possibility, however, could just mean two 5.0 litre options , one in the 'base' GT and the other in the 'Bullitt' if it returns in 2020. Only time will tell.

For now, though, it seems all but guaranteed that there will be a more powerful mid-range option of the 2.3 litre EcoBoost engine. Would you like to see a more powerful EcoBoost engine option added to the 2020 Mustang lineup? I'm not one to say no to more horsepower so that would be a resounding 'YES' from me.

Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!





Comments







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

Falken Azenis RT615k+ Street and Track Review

Last year, I picked up a 2009 Lancer Ralliart to do a long term test with it as a dual duty track/daily. One of the first things I knew I was going to do was put a decent set of tires on it. The car came without OEM wheels which was actually good because I didn't have to hesitate about getting a good set of aftermarket wheels to support going wider. Thankfully, my friends at YST Auto Halifax  set me up with a great set of Superspeed RF03RR wheels. The Wheels I had never even heard of Superspeed but I trusted the good folk at YST Auto who mentioned some customer cars running on track with them. These wheels are rotary forged which is basically a prerequisite to be taken seriously in this market populated by companies like TSW and Fast Wheels. The wheels looked like a high quality, well finished wheel and each had a "QC" check sticker on. Just for appearances? Maybe, but I found no defects. The wheels seemed easy to balance (didn't need many weights) and at 18.1 lb. f

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track load

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity. Grip is noticeably l