Skip to main content

2020 Shelby GT500 Top Speed & Downforce Figures Revealed

The last iteration of the Shelby GT500 that debuted in 2012 as a 2013 model year had 663 hp and a claimed top speed of over 200 mph. While some publications tried and failed to replicate the top speed claim, you knew that somewhere under specific conditions, Ford probably was able to crack 200 mph. If you were expecting the new one with "over 700 hp" to also crack 200 mph (I was), you'd be wrong.

Ford is going to equip the new Shelby GT500 with a 180 mph governor, meaning the GT500 will be electronically limited with a top speed of 180 mph. That is, at least until someone fiddles with it like they do with BMW's and remove the 155 mph limiter. Thankfully, it appears that top speed has been sacrificed at the altar of track performance.

A More Balanced Pony Car

A Ford spokesman told me that "Ford Performance engineers and professional drivers have found the sweet spot to make the all-new Shelby GT500 as fast as possible at both road courses and the drag strip." The goal? To "deliver the fastest track times ever in a production Mustang along with improved driver control for greater confidence behind the wheel." Colour me (very) giddy.

Earlier today, Ford just revealed how amount of effort and dedication to making sure the car can deal with high speed on track and it is fantastic. As I have said in previous posts, one of the biggest enemies of speed is heat. Ford clearly knows that because its engineers went through 500 3D cooling and aerodynamic designs to find the optimal combination of design exterior elements that can deliver the target cooling and aerodynamic performance. Ford didn't just simulate spoilers, grilles, and vents, they even went as far as simulating the brake ducts.

By The Numbers

Ford says that the front brakes alone generate 100 kW of heat (341,300 Btu/hr or British Thermal Units/hour). At maximum power, the cooling system needs to be able to deal with 230 kW of heat (784,990 Btu/hr). The result is six heat exchangers and a front fascia that deliver 50% MORE airflow at top speed than the Shelby GT350. There are also new oil and transmission coolers. Downforce is also much higher.

Just about everything you see on the car is functional. The rear diffuser is Shelby specific and functional. The front splitter? Ford went through more than 10 wicker designs (actually built them using 3D printers) so they could be tested and perfected. There are 16 aero flaps around the radiator fan to direct airflow so that drag and front-end lift are better managed while increasing cooling airflow. All of those components (and others throughout the car) work with the rear wing taken from the GT4 racer to deliver 550 lb. (249 kg) of downforce at the 180 mph top speed.

No Track Pack? No Problem

Even if you don't opt for the Carbon Fibre Track Package, you still get 379 lb. (172 kg) at top speed. Considering that the vast, vast majority of road cars have lift, this is very impressive. In fact, the 650 hp C7 Corvette Z06 with the Z07 (track) package manages to deliver "only" 350 lb. of downforce at 150 mph.

Ford said that, despite all the testing and optimization, it was able to dramatically reduce the development time thanks to state of the art "digital and additive manufacturing prototyping tools". The result is being able to run more tests in less time and lower development costs that would be required to test all those systems and designs, according to Ford. Ford certainly seems to be invested in 3D printing and rapid prototyping if you have watched Ford's video about why it had to 3D print the manifold of Ken Block's 914 HP Gymkhana Hoonitruck.

Being a Mustang fan might make me a bit biased, but I think it's really cool to see that Ford is using the technology in mass produced cars as well (albeit, top halo versions) instead of only one-off builds. And Ford didn't just simulate and test prototype parts, of course. The normal regiment of track testing followed at various tracks across the US such as Virginia International Raceway (VIR), NOLA Motorsports Park and GingerMan Raceway.

Obviously, all manufacturers who are serious about building a proper track car go through similar efforts and tests, even if done with different goals or technology, but Ford had something to prove here IMO. The last GT500 was very much a boulevard cruiser. It handled well for what it was, but it was ultimately a tire-smoking, record-hp setting, bruiser of a pony car whereas this one? This one is a serious well-balanced performance car. Ford seems to have known this and it looks like they cut absolutely no corners. And the Track Pack-equipped GT500 is more than just well-balanced, it is (very) well-focused on track performance.

Unfortunately, Ford is still quiet on the horsepower figure, but it reiterated that the GT500 will be going on sale this summer so expect the official power specs to be revealed any time now. Also, expect this car to give no quarter.

Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!


Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.

Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.

🔥 Most Visited This Week

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would

GTR vs Evo X vs STI: which has the best AWD system?

A few weeks ago, I made a post explaining  mainstream AWD system types and how they compare , pros and cons, etc. including some simple diagrams to show where the power goes and how much. As promised, this post will focus on specific cars and what AWD systems they use, especially ones that that have more or less been defined by their AWD systems, and the best place to start may be with a bombshell; the Nissan GT-R. Nissan GT-R (R35) The GT-R has built a reputation around having monster traction and very approachable performance, thanks to its AWD system - Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain (ATTESA) - and what it can do for you. But the GT-R doesn't actually use the most mechanically sophisticated type of AWD systems discussed in the previous article, namely a "true" AWD with a centre differential. Instead, it uses a clutch pack to transfer power. RWD-based clutch-type AWD schematic - Rams Eye The Track Guy © The R32, R33, and R34 Sky

How would a Mustang 3.5L EcoBoost compare to the 5.0L V8?

Ever wonder how a 3.5 litre EcoBoost might fair against the 5.0 litre V8 in the Mustang? Of course you have. Ever since Ford dropped it in the F150 (and perhaps well before), everyone has been wondering how it would perform. There are basically two camps; those who think it would be awesome because of tuneability and power potential and those who think it means the death of the V8 in the Mustang. If you are in the latter group, we seem to be good so far with continuous upgrades to the 5.0 litre Coyote and the brand new Shelby GT500 which still uses a supercharged V8 as it has been for over a decade and multiple iterations. But what if... Well, it seems we are closer than ever to finding out the answer to that question. American Trucks recently got together two crew cab, short box, 4x4 F150's but one has the 5.0 litre V8 and the other has the 3.5 litre EcoBoost V6. There has been a few comparisons between 5.0 litre and 3.5 litre EB F150's, but this seems to be the most di

Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R Track Review

2012 Boss 302 on square 305/30/19 RE-71R's at AMP - Graham MacNeil © For better or for worse, I have heard and read so much about RE-71R's. Everyone swears by the grip but complains about the wear. Generally speaking, the pros are: 1. They grip as well or better than most R comps. 2. They don't wear as quickly as R comps if driven occasionally on the street. 3. They work better in the rain than R comps. The cons were limited to overheating quickly when used on track (being an autocross tire) and wearing too fast on heavy cars like mine. In the popular 200 TW category, they are faster than the popular Hankook RS-4's and BFGoodrich Rival S's according to published Tire Rack Tests. According to plenty of reviews, they are also faster than well established R comps like R888R's (which don't seem to work too well on heavy cars anyway) and the venerable NT01's. But I was still hesitant for a while until I talked to a tire tech support gentleman