Skip to main content

2020 Shelby GT500 Top Speed & Downforce Figures Revealed

The last iteration of the Shelby GT500 that debuted in 2012 as a 2013 model year had 663 hp and a claimed top speed of over 200 mph. While some publications tried and failed to replicate the top speed claim, you knew that somewhere under specific conditions, Ford probably was able to crack 200 mph. If you were expecting the new one with "over 700 hp" to also crack 200 mph (I was), you'd be wrong.

Ford is going to equip the new Shelby GT500 with a 180 mph governor, meaning the GT500 will be electronically limited with a top speed of 180 mph. That is, at least until someone fiddles with it like they do with BMW's and remove the 155 mph limiter. Thankfully, it appears that top speed has been sacrificed at the altar of track performance.

A More Balanced Pony Car

A Ford spokesman told me that "Ford Performance engineers and professional drivers have found the sweet spot to make the all-new Shelby GT500 as fast as possible at both road courses and the drag strip." The goal? To "deliver the fastest track times ever in a production Mustang along with improved driver control for greater confidence behind the wheel." Colour me (very) giddy.

Earlier today, Ford just revealed how amount of effort and dedication to making sure the car can deal with high speed on track and it is fantastic. As I have said in previous posts, one of the biggest enemies of speed is heat. Ford clearly knows that because its engineers went through 500 3D cooling and aerodynamic designs to find the optimal combination of design exterior elements that can deliver the target cooling and aerodynamic performance. Ford didn't just simulate spoilers, grilles, and vents, they even went as far as simulating the brake ducts.

By The Numbers

Ford says that the front brakes alone generate 100 kW of heat (341,300 Btu/hr or British Thermal Units/hour). At maximum power, the cooling system needs to be able to deal with 230 kW of heat (784,990 Btu/hr). The result is six heat exchangers and a front fascia that deliver 50% MORE airflow at top speed than the Shelby GT350. There are also new oil and transmission coolers. Downforce is also much higher.

Just about everything you see on the car is functional. The rear diffuser is Shelby specific and functional. The front splitter? Ford went through more than 10 wicker designs (actually built them using 3D printers) so they could be tested and perfected. There are 16 aero flaps around the radiator fan to direct airflow so that drag and front-end lift are better managed while increasing cooling airflow. All of those components (and others throughout the car) work with the rear wing taken from the GT4 racer to deliver 550 lb. (249 kg) of downforce at the 180 mph top speed.

No Track Pack? No Problem

Even if you don't opt for the Carbon Fibre Track Package, you still get 379 lb. (172 kg) at top speed. Considering that the vast, vast majority of road cars have lift, this is very impressive. In fact, the 650 hp C7 Corvette Z06 with the Z07 (track) package manages to deliver "only" 350 lb. of downforce at 150 mph.

Ford said that, despite all the testing and optimization, it was able to dramatically reduce the development time thanks to state of the art "digital and additive manufacturing prototyping tools". The result is being able to run more tests in less time and lower development costs that would be required to test all those systems and designs, according to Ford. Ford certainly seems to be invested in 3D printing and rapid prototyping if you have watched Ford's video about why it had to 3D print the manifold of Ken Block's 914 HP Gymkhana Hoonitruck.

Being a Mustang fan might make me a bit biased, but I think it's really cool to see that Ford is using the technology in mass produced cars as well (albeit, top halo versions) instead of only one-off builds. And Ford didn't just simulate and test prototype parts, of course. The normal regiment of track testing followed at various tracks across the US such as Virginia International Raceway (VIR), NOLA Motorsports Park and GingerMan Raceway.

Obviously, all manufacturers who are serious about building a proper track car go through similar efforts and tests, even if done with different goals or technology, but Ford had something to prove here IMO. The last GT500 was very much a boulevard cruiser. It handled well for what it was, but it was ultimately a tire-smoking, record-hp setting, bruiser of a pony car whereas this one? This one is a serious well-balanced performance car. Ford seems to have known this and it looks like they cut absolutely no corners. And the Track Pack-equipped GT500 is more than just well-balanced, it is (very) well-focused on track performance.

Unfortunately, Ford is still quiet on the horsepower figure, but it reiterated that the GT500 will be going on sale this summer so expect the official power specs to be revealed any time now. Also, expect this car to give no quarter.

Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!


Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.

Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.

🔥 Most Visited This Week

Falken Azenis RT615k+ Street and Track Review

Last year, I picked up a 2009 Lancer Ralliart to do a long term test with it as a dual duty track/daily. One of the first things I knew I was going to do was put a decent set of tires on it. The car came without OEM wheels which was actually good because I didn't have to hesitate about getting a good set of aftermarket wheels to support going wider. Thankfully, my friends at YST Auto Halifax  set me up with a great set of Superspeed RF03RR wheels. The Wheels I had never even heard of Superspeed but I trusted the good folk at YST Auto who mentioned some customer cars running on track with them. These wheels are rotary forged which is basically a prerequisite to be taken seriously in this market populated by companies like TSW and Fast Wheels. The wheels looked like a high quality, well finished wheel and each had a "QC" check sticker on. Just for appearances? Maybe, but I found no defects. The wheels seemed easy to balance (didn't need many weights) and at 18.1 lb. f

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track load

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity. Grip is noticeably l