Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

Cadillac Just Revealed the Brand New CT5 Ahead of New York


Cadillac sedans aren't dead after all, as evident by the brand new CT5 just revealed this morning ahead of its formal debut at the upcoming New York Auto Show. The reveal was done using "a social media campaign designed to stimulate the senses using autonomous sensory meridian response, also known as ASMR."... whatever that means.

Cadillac says that the videos are meant to trigger a physical response such as a spine-tingling sensation, which is great I guess if you're into that sort of thing. Unfortunately, the video seems to very light on detail, but at least some critical bits are revealed.


Design

For starters, the current newest sedan in Cadillac's lineup is the CT6, which looks ancient now next to the CT5. I'm a big Cadillac fan - which shocks most people considering that I am a Mustang guy. But I like what they have been doing, particularly their V-series models. I also liked their "Arts & Science" design language and was worried that whatever they come up with next won't be as good, but I think they did a fantastic job evolving it. Speaking of evolution, while I did start by saying Cadillac sedans aren't dead, it does certainly look like the traditional sedan is.

The new CT5 is very clearly a fastback sedan, much like the Audi A5 Sportback and the BMW 4-series Gran Coupe. It may be larger than those, however, and closer in size to the A7 since the CT5 is meant to replace the CTS which was in the same class as the BMW 5-series, Audi A6, and Mercedes E-class. With that said, I suspect it will be a "tweener"; larger than a 3-series and smaller than a 5-series. The replacement for the ATS - Cadillac's current smallest sedan that has been axed - is still in development so the CT5 will likely hold potential Cadillac buyers over until a smaller sedan is offered so it has to slot in between.


Engine & Transmission

Like the dimensions, not much is known underneath the skin, except that there will be two engine options available at launch, a 2.0 litre turbo 4 cylinder and a 3.0 litre twin-turbo V6. Horsepower figures aren't revealed. The most powerful version of the 2.0 litre turbo engine currently makes 275 hp and 295 lb-ft torque in the entry-level Camaro and the most powerful version of the twin-turbo V6 makes 400 hp and 404 lb-ft torque in the larger CT6. Those figures will likely not change much and they do compare favourably with BMW's and Audi's equivalent offerings.

The only transmission offered will be the newest 10-speed automatic, which was co-developed with Ford. It is used in the Camaro and the Mustang as well as a number of other trucks and SUV's, including the mighty F-150 Raptor. Both engines will pair to RWD or AWD drivetrains. There will also be a "Sport" option, but no other details about that are revealed.


Chassis

The car will be built on an evolution of the chassis that underpinned the Cadillac ATS, code named 'Alpha' chassis. It has been unanimously praised for its performance including handling, feel, composure, rigidity, lightweight etc., but criticized for its lack of refinement (and space). Cadillac no doubt have addressed those concerns, but only time will tell if the effort is enough.


Other Options

You can be sure that the car will eventually come with GM's excellent Magnetic Ride Control (magnetorheological dampers), and a V-series model down the road. A hybrid or plug-in hybrid is all but guaranteed as well, I'd say.

Inside, it appears that Cadillac's much decried Cadillac User Experience (CUE) system is getting a significant overhaul or replaced all together much like they did with the recently revealed XT6. Instead of controlling almost all function with touch sensitive buttons, there is a rotary knob controller in the centre stack that's very similar to BMW's iDrive controller. You can also see actual physical buttons for seat heaters, parking assist, and some A/C controls. I suspect touch-sensitive controls will still be there and the physical controls are redundant but it's a very welcome change.


Why It Matters

I typically don't pay much attention to all reveals but this is a big one. Cadillac has been making some of the best driving sedans you can buy lately but they just seem to lack some polish and cache that the German brands have. As a result, sales haven't been great and it would have been easy for Cadillac to just throw in the towel and give up, so it's nice to see they are taking another kick at the (sport sedan) can. GM said that it will be built at the "Lansing Grand River facility who have experience and talent in crafting American performance sedans" so they haven't gone back to building luxury barges just yet.

Cadillac will be posting a new one of those tingly videos every week until the reveal, so head over to Cadillac's YouTube channel and stay tuned.

Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!





Comments







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

Falken Azenis RT615k+ Street and Track Review

Last year, I picked up a 2009 Lancer Ralliart to do a long term test with it as a dual duty track/daily. One of the first things I knew I was going to do was put a decent set of tires on it. The car came without OEM wheels which was actually good because I didn't have to hesitate about getting a good set of aftermarket wheels to support going wider. Thankfully, my friends at YST Auto Halifax  set me up with a great set of Superspeed RF03RR wheels. The Wheels I had never even heard of Superspeed but I trusted the good folk at YST Auto who mentioned some customer cars running on track with them. These wheels are rotary forged which is basically a prerequisite to be taken seriously in this market populated by companies like TSW and Fast Wheels. The wheels looked like a high quality, well finished wheel and each had a "QC" check sticker on. Just for appearances? Maybe, but I found no defects. The wheels seemed easy to balance (didn't need many weights) and at 18.1 lb. f

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track load

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's vs Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's

I never thought I'd ever run Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's on my 2012 Boss 302. The cost is astronomical and they are supposed to last the least of anything comparable. So how did I end up with (nearly) fresh Sport Cup 2's? A complete fluke. I came across a lightly used set with only a few hundred miles and no track time; 305/30/19 takeoffs from a GT Performance Pack Level 2 (GT PPL2). I knew my 71R's were getting very worn before the season started and likely wouldn't last the whole season, even this short one. The price was far better than a new set of RE-71R's, a little more than half, and local Time Attack rules (Canadian Automobile Sport Clubs) recently made 180 and 200 TW tires equivalent, meaning no PAX or PIP point penalty for going with 180 TW tire like the Pilot Sport Cup 2's. I have been very curious about how PSC2's compare to RE 71R's but I stayed away due to their being painfully expensive and, up to last year, their 180 TW rating would

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity. Grip is noticeably l