Skip to main content

Cadillac Just Revealed the Brand New CT5 Ahead of New York

Cadillac sedans aren't dead after all, as evident by the brand new CT5 just revealed this morning ahead of its formal debut at the upcoming New York Auto Show. The reveal was done using "a social media campaign designed to stimulate the senses using autonomous sensory meridian response, also known as ASMR."... whatever that means.

Cadillac says that the videos are meant to trigger a physical response such as a spine-tingling sensation, which is great I guess if you're into that sort of thing. Unfortunately, the video seems to very light on detail, but at least some critical bits are revealed.


For starters, the current newest sedan in Cadillac's lineup is the CT6, which looks ancient now next to the CT5. I'm a big Cadillac fan - which shocks most people considering that I am a Mustang guy. But I like what they have been doing, particularly their V-series models. I also liked their "Arts & Science" design language and was worried that whatever they come up with next won't be as good, but I think they did a fantastic job evolving it. Speaking of evolution, while I did start by saying Cadillac sedans aren't dead, it does certainly look like the traditional sedan is.

The new CT5 is very clearly a fastback sedan, much like the Audi A5 Sportback and the BMW 4-series Gran Coupe. It may be larger than those, however, and closer in size to the A7 since the CT5 is meant to replace the CTS which was in the same class as the BMW 5-series, Audi A6, and Mercedes E-class. With that said, I suspect it will be a "tweener"; larger than a 3-series and smaller than a 5-series. The replacement for the ATS - Cadillac's current smallest sedan that has been axed - is still in development so the CT5 will likely hold potential Cadillac buyers over until a smaller sedan is offered so it has to slot in between.

Engine & Transmission

Like the dimensions, not much is known underneath the skin, except that there will be two engine options available at launch, a 2.0 litre turbo 4 cylinder and a 3.0 litre twin-turbo V6. Horsepower figures aren't revealed. The most powerful version of the 2.0 litre turbo engine currently makes 275 hp and 295 lb-ft torque in the entry-level Camaro and the most powerful version of the twin-turbo V6 makes 400 hp and 404 lb-ft torque in the larger CT6. Those figures will likely not change much and they do compare favourably with BMW's and Audi's equivalent offerings.

The only transmission offered will be the newest 10-speed automatic, which was co-developed with Ford. It is used in the Camaro and the Mustang as well as a number of other trucks and SUV's, including the mighty F-150 Raptor. Both engines will pair to RWD or AWD drivetrains. There will also be a "Sport" option, but no other details about that are revealed.


The car will be built on an evolution of the chassis that underpinned the Cadillac ATS, code named 'Alpha' chassis. It has been unanimously praised for its performance including handling, feel, composure, rigidity, lightweight etc., but criticized for its lack of refinement (and space). Cadillac no doubt have addressed those concerns, but only time will tell if the effort is enough.

Other Options

You can be sure that the car will eventually come with GM's excellent Magnetic Ride Control (magnetorheological dampers), and a V-series model down the road. A hybrid or plug-in hybrid is all but guaranteed as well, I'd say.

Inside, it appears that Cadillac's much decried Cadillac User Experience (CUE) system is getting a significant overhaul or replaced all together much like they did with the recently revealed XT6. Instead of controlling almost all function with touch sensitive buttons, there is a rotary knob controller in the centre stack that's very similar to BMW's iDrive controller. You can also see actual physical buttons for seat heaters, parking assist, and some A/C controls. I suspect touch-sensitive controls will still be there and the physical controls are redundant but it's a very welcome change.

Why It Matters

I typically don't pay much attention to all reveals but this is a big one. Cadillac has been making some of the best driving sedans you can buy lately but they just seem to lack some polish and cache that the German brands have. As a result, sales haven't been great and it would have been easy for Cadillac to just throw in the towel and give up, so it's nice to see they are taking another kick at the (sport sedan) can. GM said that it will be built at the "Lansing Grand River facility who have experience and talent in crafting American performance sedans" so they haven't gone back to building luxury barges just yet.

Cadillac will be posting a new one of those tingly videos every week until the reveal, so head over to Cadillac's YouTube channel and stay tuned.

Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!


Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.

Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.

🔥 Most Visited This Week

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track load

Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R Track Review

2012 Boss 302 on square 305/30/19 RE-71R's at AMP - Graham MacNeil © For better or for worse, I have heard and read so much about RE-71R's. Everyone swears by the grip but complains about the wear. Generally speaking, the pros are: 1. They grip as well or better than most R comps. 2. They don't wear as quickly as R comps if driven occasionally on the street. 3. They work better in the rain than R comps. The cons were limited to overheating quickly when used on track (being an autocross tire) and wearing too fast on heavy cars like mine. In the popular 200 TW category, they are faster than the popular Hankook RS-4's and BFGoodrich Rival S's according to published Tire Rack Tests. According to plenty of reviews, they are also faster than well established R comps like R888R's (which don't seem to work too well on heavy cars anyway) and the venerable NT01's. But I was still hesitant for a while until I talked to a tire tech support gentleman

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's

If you've had any doubts about whether or not they will fit, fear not! You absolutely can run square 305/30/19's. I had a lot of doubts before pulling the trigger, even more so when the wheels where on the car. The tires do poke out a bit and I figured rubbing is all but guaranteed at full compression but I couldn't be happier I trusted APEX and those on here who have run it. Here's what you need: 1. Camber plates: I have MM C/C plates and they are maxed out at -2.3 deg with the stock struts. I have been running them for years with many track days without issue. 2. 1"/25 mm spacer: I have Motorsport-tech 1" spacers and they look like high quality units. There is maybe a 1/4 inch clearance in the back so you can't go any narrower than 25 mm. and you want Design 2. Motorsport Tech 1" Mustang Hub-centric Spacers 3. Elongated studs: your best bet is to get the FPP hubs with elongated studs

GTR vs Evo X vs STI: which has the best AWD system?

A few weeks ago, I made a post explaining  mainstream AWD system types and how they compare , pros and cons, etc. including some simple diagrams to show where the power goes and how much. As promised, this post will focus on specific cars and what AWD systems they use, especially ones that that have more or less been defined by their AWD systems, and the best place to start may be with a bombshell; the Nissan GT-R. Nissan GT-R (R35) The GT-R has built a reputation around having monster traction and very approachable performance, thanks to its AWD system - Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain (ATTESA) - and what it can do for you. But the GT-R doesn't actually use the most mechanically sophisticated type of AWD systems discussed in the previous article, namely a "true" AWD with a centre differential. Instead, it uses a clutch pack to transfer power. RWD-based clutch-type AWD schematic - Rams Eye The Track Guy © The R32, R33, and R34 Sky