Skip to main content

This Lanzante Porsche 930 is powered by a GP-winning F1 Engine

Whenever I hear of an outlandish 911 build, I always wonder what hardcore 911 would think. In my experience, they tend to love tradition and preserving the 911 legacy. This car breaks two of the holy trinity of classic 911's; rear engined, flat-six, and air-cooled. It is still rear engined but it uses a V6, water-cooled engine. But I can't imagine a single 911 fan being upset about this.

You see, this isn't just any water-cooled V6 engine. It is a Formula 1 twin-turbocharged 1.5 litre V6 out of a McLaren MP4/3 F1 car. Further preserving the Porsche-ness of this build, the engine was built by a partnership formed between Porsche and TAG to provide engines for McLaren F1 team. Porsche was responsible for the technical burden of design and engineering and TAG financed the effort and stuck its name on the engine as "TAG turbo" since McLaren didn't want Porsche's name on their F1 car.

Lanzante first revealed the car in October last year shortly after the annual Porsche Rennsport Reunion, but very few details details were known. Thankfully, PistonHeads went to Lanzante's workshop and found out a whole lot more about it.

The Engine

Given that this was the 80's and F1 rules were not nearly as limiting as today, the engine made 1,060 hp with a 12,600 rpm redline (although it was run at 960 hp in race spec). For reference, today's F1 turbocharged V6 engines displace slightly more volume at 1.6 litres and are limited to 15,000 rpm redline by rules (although most are running them lower for fuel efficiency and reliability). The power output is much lower, however, being under 800 hp for all engines (2017) without KERS, but it approaches 1,000 hp with KERS.

Of course, today's engines are far more efficient but there is something fascinating about a 30+ year old engine that is smaller, revs lower, yet makes more power, a testament to the madness of F1 back then.

The Challenges

The idea of putting an F1 engine in a road car is magnificent all on its own, but it goes beyond just finding enough room to shove the engine back there. Lanzante didn't want this to just be a mad exercise. Fitting a V6 - and a tall one at that - in the back of a 911 that was never meant to fit something taller than a flat six is a challenge in its own right, but perhaps an even bigger challenge is providing it with enough cooling for engine coolant, oil, and intercoolers.

Providing enough cooling to an engine in the back is not easy. Just look at a modern (992) 911 with a turbocharged engine (that is nowhere near this highly strung) and you'll find wide haunches with inlets and vents fore and aft of the wheels. Without that much real estate in a 930 and no previous water-cooling plumbing to work with, Lanzante designed a custom system.

There is a radiator at the front of the car with coolant piped to it from the engine and back. To get enough air, Lanzante used a bumper from a 911 SE flatnose with the centre section feeding the radiator and the two side openings meant to house fog lights feeding oil coolers. At the back, there appears to be a large air to air intercooler to bring down charge air temperature after the turbos, before making its way to the manifold.

Engine Specs

And you will need a lot of charge air cooling because the engine is running at a massive peak boost of 43.5 psi (3.0 bar or 300 kPa). For reference, the new (992) 911 Carrera S will run at only 16.0 psi (1.1 bar pr 110 kPa) and make 450 hp. Speaking of power, this engine is substantially detuned to "only" 503 hp and 310 lb-ft torque (375 kW and 420 Nm). This isn't because of design limitations or slowing down the car, though. It's simply for reliability.

F1 engines are highly strung and require meticulous (and regular) maintenance. Race car engines, in general, require far more frequent rebuilds than road cars - with length of time between builds often measured in hours instead of miles. F1 cars were even more demanding back then. Lanzante wanted the car to be usable so they got Cosworth involved to improve the reliability and longevity of the engine. The sky-high 43.5 psi peak boost is actually 25% LOWER than race spec, which ran at 58 psi (4.0 bar or 400 kPa). Cosworth also fit smaller turbos, so they will build boost faster and reduce lag.

Air-fuel ratios were also adjusted to make them more conservative (likely richer than race spec) and torque curve is fairly flat, with peak available across 50% of the rev range. And speaking of rev range, redline was also lowered to 9,000 rpm.

I don't know about you, but I'm just completely mesmerized by the notion of power being "lowered" to 503 hp. Peak boost is "lowered" to 43.5 psi. Redline being "lowered" to 9,000 rpm. There are constant reminders of the massive feat that Lanzante and Cosworth are doing here to put an F1 engine in a road car and the achievement that it is to be able to drive a car powered by a (modified) F1 engine on the road.

The two main goals was to make it useable and flexible, hence the flat torque curve and lowered output and redline. Making an F1 engine last is no easy challenge. Even the new Mercedes AMG Project One will require rebuilds every 50,000 km (31,068.5 mi) according to Mercedes.

What About The Rest of The Car?

Attention didn't just go to the powertrain, as you'd expect. The suspension is all new using coilovers that Lanzante is tuning to make the car more forgiving but still retain the characteristic 911 handling. The brakes are likely to be all carbon cermaic. The tires are new Pirelli PZero 255/40/17 in the back and 225/40/17 in the front wrapped around the original 17" RUF wheels.

And Lanzante (unsurprisingly) wanted to bring weight down further so there are lightweight components throughout, chief of which are the hood and rear engine cover which are made out of carbon fibre. The doors skins are made out of aluminum. Combined with a 220 lb. (100 kg) saving due to the lighter engine, the car is said to be about 518 lb. (235 kg) lighter than the original, at a curb weight of 2,425 lb. (1,100 kg). If you've been paying attention, that gives it a power-to-weight ratio of 457 hp/tonne (4.82 lb./hp) - as close as makes no difference the same as 991 GT2 RS. Top speed? 200 mph.

Handling all that power is a G50/20 6-speed gearbox, which was used in the 993 generation 911. Lanzante is also fitting them with a limited-slip differential to manage power delivery. But there is a clear effort to make the car look as close to original as possible, concealing all the brilliant engineering underneath. That means only original Porsche colours and trims will be offered and, short of Recaro Pole Positions and custom gauges (including an awesome 10,000 rpm gauge), the interior looks period correct as well.

It'll Set You (very far) Back...

If you were expecting this to be expensive, you are absolutely correct. It'll cost you £1.095 million ($1.450 million USD) if you want one of them. And even if you have the money, you can't just phone Lanzante or visit their shop and buy one. Lanzante will hand pick the buyers who are more likely to drive and enjoy the car; take it to different events to showcase the work, much like what Ford has been doing with the new Ford GT.

But one thing Ford can't do is claim they have a winning F1 engine in the back. Not even Mercedes can claim that with the AMG Project One. This is because - as mentioned at the beginning - this car will use actual F1 engines that have raced. Lanzante is building 11 of them and all but 2 cars will use engines that have raced. Names like Niki Lauda and Alain Prost are among those who've driven one of the engines. Multiple of them had several podium finishes. The one on display is powered by an engine that can claim a Grand Prix win.

The fact that a relatively tiny team of two builders can achieve what a giant like Mercedes is trying to do is massively impressive. Of course, it doesn't hurt when such team includes the experience and collective knowledge of famed builders like Lanzante and Cosworth, but that just adds to the pedigree of the build. It is simply one of the coolest cars I have ever heard of. The end result is far greater than the sum of its parts and there will never be another car like it because Lanzante bought all the engines they could get from McLaren.

What do you think of it? Would you rather a far less expensive 911 restomod using a proper flat six or does this TAG-Porsche F1 V6 engine make it even more desirable?

Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!


Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.

Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.

🔥 Most Visited This Week

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track loads.…

2014 BMW 335i xDrive M Sport Review

Post-refresh 2015 F30 3-series pictured. 
Which is better, an F30 3-series or an E46? The F30 has certainly taken its fair share of heat. But if you thought I was going to say the E46, you'd be dead wrong. The F30 3-series is better. Far better. It is quicker, faster, safer, more practical, more efficient, more refined, quieter.. the list goes on. A lot of reviews and people I talk to consider the F30 to be an abomination. Frankly, I don't see it. You'd have to be mad to think the E46 is better. Completely out to lunch. I don't know who in their right mind would prefer the E46..  Trouble is, since when were people buying sports cars in their right minds? Here, lies the real problem.

"Raw rather than refined in its noises, pounding ride, heavy clutch, 50 grand and cloth seats?"
".. and not at all shy about its performance compromises. It always acts like the automotive jock it is, every mile of every day."
"Raw and quite loud.. And sometimes ru…

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's

If you've had any doubts about whether or not they will fit, fear not! You absolutely can run square 305/30/19's. I had a lot of doubts before pulling the trigger, even more so when the wheels where on the car. The tires do poke out a bit and I figured rubbing is all but guaranteed at full compression but I couldn't be happier I trusted APEX and those on here who have run it.

Here's what you need:

1. Camber plates: I have MM C/C plates and they are maxed out at -2.3 deg with the stock struts. I have been running them for years with many track days without issue.

2. 1"/25 mm spacer: I have Motorsport-tech 1" spacers and they look like high quality units. There is maybe a 1/4 inch clearance in the back so you can't go any narrower than 25 mm. and you want Design 2.

3. Elongated studs: your best bet is to get the FPP hubs with elongated studs instead of reusing the old one. Bearings are consumables anyway so…

The Truth behind Owning a Modified Ferrari 458 Italia

After driving and reviewing this modified 620 hp Ferrari 458 Italia, I talk to the owner to find out the truth behind owning and living with a modern Ferrari. This isn't a garage queen Ferrari either, it serves double duty as an every day car and track car. Watch to find out ownership costs, reliability, and experience. Interested in joining Scott at the track? Check out MHPDC.

Liked this? Make sure to subscribe so you don't miss new videos!

Follow Rams Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!

View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Michael R (@ramseyethetrackguy) on May 21, 2019 at 5:17pm PDT